Germplasm Characterisation: Utilising the Underexploited Resources

  • N. Manikanda BoopathiEmail author


Farmers, in the given geographical region, cultivate only a small set of crop varieties for a long period of time. Modern plant breeding programs also resulted in severe genetic bottleneck. As a consequence, reduction in genetic diversity is widespread among crop plants, and it is considered as a detrimental feature to the future farming process. This is because continuous use of same cultivars usually leads to at least (1) extensive existence of (as well as emergence of new) pest and diseases to the given crop species and (2) loss of landraces and wild species of the given crop plants (which is otherwise referred to as genetic erosion). Due to ever increasing population growth and continuous shrinking of farming lands, farmers are forced to cultivate crop plants under a wide range of latitudes and longitudes. This requires crop plants which can tolerate variations in light, temperature, water and nutrients besides occurrence of peculiar pest and diseases that challenge crop production in these environments. Conventional breeding approaches such as desirable phenotypic selection among the breeding materials have considerably contributed in genetic improvement of crops. However, only a few genetically improved lines are available to meet such challenges. The main limitations that prevent the further progress through conventional breeding methods are lack of adequate genetic/biochemical/molecular knowledge on expression of traits that are beneficial to the crop cultivation and production. Most of the agronomically and economically important traits are quantitative in nature and having complex inheritance. Thanks to the developments in nucleic acid characterisation and manipulation, it is now possible to genetically analyse and manipulate such quantitative traits using quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection (MAS). Thus, advances in molecular marker technologies have opened the door to new techniques for construction and screening of breeding populations, increase the efficiency of selection and accelerate the rates of genetic gain. By employing genetic and QTL mapping, a marker can either be located within the gene of interest or be linked to a gene determining a trait of interest. Consequently, MAS can be executed as a selection for a trait based on genotype using associated markers rather than the phenotype of the trait. This book is designed to describe the basics of genetic and QTL mapping using molecular markers and practicing MAS in crop plants with step-by-step procedures. In general, MAS scheme in genetic improvement of crop plants for the given trait involves (1) characterisation of germplasm for the trait of interest, (2) selection of extremely diverse parents, (3) development of mapping population, (4) selection of appropriate combinations of molecular markers and genotyping of parents and mapping population, (5) construction of genetic or linkage map, (6) phenotyping of mapping population for the selected trait, (7) QTL analysis by combining the data obtained from step 5 and 6, (8) fine mapping and validation of QTLs and (9) executing MAS for the target trait. Therefore, this first chapter of this book is keen to describe the leading vital step in MAS: characterisation of germplasm.


Quantitative Trait Locus Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Core Collection Polymorphic Information Content Dominant Marker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Literature Cited

  1. Comai L, Young K, Till BJ et al (2004) Efficient discovery of DNA polymorphisms in natural populations by Ecotilling. Plant J 37:778–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Labate JA (2000) Software for population genetic analysis of molecular marker data. Crop Sci 40:1521–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM (2003) Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants – salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci 43:1235–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Alpert P (2006) Constraints of tolerance: why are desiccation-tolerant organisms so small or rare? J Exp Biol 209:1575–1584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araus JL, Slafer GA, Royo C, Serret MD (2008) Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:377–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker FWG (ed) (1989) Drought resistance in cereals. CAB Publishing, Wallingford, 222 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhullar NK, Zhang Z, Wicker T, Keller B (2010) Wheat gene bank accessions as a source of new alleles of the powdery mildew resistance gene Pm3: a large scale allele mining project. BMC Plant Biol 10:88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum A (2011) Plant breeding for water-limited environments. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyer JS, Westgate ME (2004) Grain yields with limited water. J Exp Bot 55:2385–2394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceccarelli S, Grando S (1996) Drought as a challenge for the plant breeder. Plant Growth Reg 20:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaves MM, Oliveira MM (2004) Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 55:2365–2384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agric Sustain Dev 29:185–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer KS, Lafitte R, Fukai S, Atlin G, Hardy B (2003) Breeding rice for drought prone environments. The International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, 98 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukai S, Cooper M (1995) Development of drought-resistant cultivars using physiomorphological traits in rice. Field Crop Res 40:67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamoshita A, Babu RC, Boopathi NM, Fukai S (2008) Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of drought-resistance traits for development of rice cultivars adapted to rainfed environments. Field Crop Res 109:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar A, Bernier J, Verulkar S, Lafitte HR, Atlin GN (2008) Breeding for drought tolerance: direct selection for yield, response to selection and use of drought-tolerant donors in upland and lowland-adapted populations. Field Crop Res 107:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lafitte HR, Li ZK, Vijayakumar CHM, Gao YM, Shi Y, Xu JL, Fu BY, Ali AJ, Domingo J, Maghirang R, Mackill DJ (2006) Breeding for resistance to abiotic stresses in rice: the value of quantitative trait loci. In: Lamkey KR, Lee M (eds) Plant breeding: the Arnel R. Hallauer international symposium. Blackwell, Ames, pp 201–212Google Scholar
  15. Monneveux P, Ribaut JM (eds) (2011) Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice. Available at Generation Challenge Program website
  16. Morison JIL, Baker NR, Mullineaux PM, Davies WJ (2008) Improving water use in crop production. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363:639–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nguyen HT, Babu RC, Blum A (1997) Breeding for drought resistance in rice: physiology and molecular genetics considerations. Crop Sci 37:1426–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Passioura JB (2007) The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. J Exp Bot 58:113–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reynolds M, Tuberosa R (2008) Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:171–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ribaut JM (ed) (2006) Drought adaptation in cereals. The Haworth Press Inc, Binghamton, 642 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Richards RA (2008) Genetic opportunities to improve cereal root systems for dryland agriculture. Plant Prod Sci 11:12–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Torres R, Mackill D (2006) Improvement of rice drought tolerance through backcross breeding: evaluation of donors and selection in drought nurseries. Field Crop Res 97:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tuberosa R, Salvi S (2007) Dissecting QTLs for tolerance to drought and salinity. In: Jenks MA, Hasegawa PM, Jain M (eds) Advances in molecular breeding toward drought and salt tolerant crops. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 381–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Molecular Biology & BioinformaticsTamil Nadu Agricultural UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations