Abstract
Civil coercion has its limitations; government regulation is only as effective as enforcement and investors base their estimates of firm value on information available from the firms themselves and from other secondary sources. While voluntary disclosure is construed as being selective or incomplete or both, negative nonfinancial news such as details of fines imposed for environmental violation is reflected in lower stock prices for a short duration. This chapter evaluates the persistence of goodwill capital for a sample of Indian companies from select industries, graded by their environmental performance. It is observed that investor concern differs across industries, and that the correlation of environmental performance with firm valuation is, at best, weak and short-lived. Periodic scrutiny and announcement of industry environmental performance by appropriately equipped independent agencies could help coordinate and sustain stakeholder pressure on industry.
Adapt or Perish, now as ever, is nature’s inexorable imperative
-H.G. Wells
English author and historian (1866–1946)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This chapter is largely based on Srinivasan and Singh (2010).
- 2.
- 3.
Plant level ranks are awarded within the cement industry, which are averaged to compute firm level ranks.
- 4.
- 5.
Announcement dates for the GRP ranks are mentioned alongside the respective plots.
- 6.
“Application of the ISO 14000 Family”, http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/otherpubs/iso14000/index.html
References
Aerts W, Cormier D, Magnan M (2008) Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: an international perspective. Ecol Econ 64:643–659
Al-Tuwaijri Sulaiman A, Christensen TE, Hughes KE II (2004) The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Acc Org Soc 29(5–6):447–471
Arora S, Cason TN (1995) An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: participation in EPA’s 33/50 program. J Environ Econ Manage 28(3):271–286
Arora S, Gangopadhyay S (1995) Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. J Econ Behav Org 28(3):289–309
Barron OE, Byard Donal KC, Riedl EJ (2002) High-technology intangibles and analysts’ forecasts. J Acc Res 40(2):289–312
Benn S, Dunphy D, Martin A (2009) Governance of environmental risk: new approaches to managing stakeholder involvement. J Environ Manage 90(4):1567–1575
Bugeja M, Gallery N (2006) Is older goodwill value relevant? Acc Finance 46(4):519–535
Chiao C, Hung W (2006) Stock market valuations of R&D and electronics firms during Taiwan’s recent economic transition. Dev Econ 44(1):53–78
Cleantech Venture Network (2006) http://cleantech.com/index.cfm?pageSRC=CleantechDefined.Accessed 3 Mar 2007
Cordero RR, Roth P, Da Silva L (2005) Economic growth or environmental protection? Environ Sci Policy 8(4):392–398
Cormier D, Magnan M (1997) Investors’ assessment of implicit environmental liabilities: an empirical investigation. J Acc Public Policy 16(2):215–241
Cormier D, Magnan M (2007) The revisited contribution of environmental reporting to investors’ valuation of a firm’s earnings: an international perspective. Ecol Econ 62(3–4):613–626
Cormier D, Magnan M, Morard B (1993) The impact of corporate pollution on market valuation: some empirical evidence. Ecol Econ 8(2):135–155
Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Mamingi N (2001) Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. J Environ Econ Manage 42(3):310–335
Dasgupta S, Hong JH, Benoit L, Mamingi N (2006) Disclosure of environmental violations and stock market in the Republic of Korea. Ecol Econ 58(4):759–777
Eiadat Y, Kelly A, Roche F, Eyadat H (2008) Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. J World Bus 43(2):131–145
Farzin YH, Kort PM (1998) Pollution abatement investment when environmental regulation is uncertain. FEEM working paper no. 75.98. FEEM, Milan
Feldman SJ, Soyka PA, Ameer PG (1997) Does improving a firm’s environmental system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? J Invest 6:87–97
Freedman M, Jaggi B (2005) Global warming, commitment to Kyoto protocol, and accounting disclosures by the largest global public firms from polluting industries. Int J Acc 40(3):215–232
Freedman M, Patten DM (2004) Evidence on the pernicious effect of financial report environmental disclosure. Acc Forum 28(1):27–41
Goodman SL, Det Norske Veritas (DNV) (1998) Is ISO 14001 an important element in business survival?. The Quality Magazine of Australia, June Ed
Gupta S, Goldar B (2003) Do stockmarkets penalise environment-unfriendly behavior? Evidence from India. Centre for Civil Society, New Delhi
Hamilton JT (1995) Pollution as news: media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. J Environ Econ Manage 28(1):98–113
Hart SL, Ahuja G (1998) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus Strategy Environ 5(1):30–37
Hartl RF, Kort PM (1996) Capital accumulation of a firm facing an emissions tax. J Econ 63(1):1–23
Kristrom B, Lundgren T (2003) Abatement investments and green goodwill. Appl Econ 35(18):1915–1921
Lev B, Sougiannis T (1999) Penetrating the book-to-market black box: the R&D effect. J Bus Finance Acc 26(3–4):419–449
Lorraine NHJ, Collison DJ, Power DM (2004) An analysis of the stock market impact of environmental performance information. Acc Forum 28(1):7–26
Lundgren T (2003) A real options approach to abatement investments and green goodwill. Environ Resour Econ 25(1):17–31
Makower J (1993) The E-factor: the bottom-line approach to environmentally responsible business. Times Books, New York
Matolcsy Z, Wyatt A (2006) Capitalized intangibles and financial analysts. Acc Finance 46(3):457–479
Morales A (2007) British airways’ carbon offsetting is ‘risible’, lawmakers say. Bloomberg, 23 July 2007
Mueller DC, Supina D (2002) Goodwill capital. Small Bus Econ 19:233–253
Newell P (2005) Citizenship, accountability and community: the limits of the CSR agenda. Int Aff 81(3):541–557
Piasecki B, Asmus P (2006) Why wall street is greener than the white house. Renewable Energy Access, 19 Feb 2006. http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=43739
Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, Sept–Oct Ed
Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Harvard Business School working paper no. 09–019, http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/09-019.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2012
Reinhardt FL (2000) Down to earth: applying business principles to environmental management. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Reuters Limited (2007) GE issues credit card aimed to cut emissions. Reuters, 25 July 2007
Sokri A, Zaccour G (2006) A differential game of environmental regulation and information. Presented at the 12th international symposium on dynamic games and applications, France
Sridharan (2004) Features: BT special: “India’s greenest companies”, Business Today, 24 Oct 2004
Srinivasan S, Singh RK (2010) The persistence of green goodwill. Environment, development and sustainability 12(5):825–837, Springer Limited, UK
Sumiani Y, Haslinda Y, Lehman G (2007) Environmental reporting in a developing country: a case study on status and implementation in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 15(10):895–901
Swanda JR Jr (1990) Goodwill, going concern, stocks and flows: a prescription for moral analysis. J Bus Ethics 9(9):751–759
Wirl F, Noll J (2007) Voluntary (environmental) standards. J Econ Bus 59(4):275–285
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sunderasan, S. (2013). The Persistence of Green Goodwill. In: Enabling Environment. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0882-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0882-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, India
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-0881-5
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-0882-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)