Human Capital, Labour Productivity and Employment

  • Savita Bhat
  • N. S. SiddharthanEmail author


This chapter analyses the importance of human capital in determining the interstate differences in labour productivity and its growth in India. The chapter also examines the impact of human capital differences on the growth of employment for a cross section of Indian states for the period 2003–2007. It argues that the current technology is human capital and knowledge intensive and cannot be used in the absence of skill development. Due to the presence of skill bias in the new technology, persons with less education would become victims. The panel model results of generalised least squares using cross-sectional weights show that after controlling for other determinants, variables representing human capital emerge significant determinants of productivity. Furthermore, higher enrolments in high schools contribute not only to higher labour productivity but also to higher growth in productivity. In addition, states that have higher high school enrolment rates have been enjoying higher growth rates of employment. On the whole, the results presented show strong skill bias in productivity and employment growths across states.


Human Capital Foreign Direct Investment Labour Productivity Employment Growth Fixed Capital 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We are grateful to Saumitra Bhaduri, K. S. Kavi Kumar, K. R. Shanmugam and Brinda Viswanathan for several helpful comments and suggestions.


  1. Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE (2005) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Res Policy 34(8):1191–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltagi BH (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data, 3rd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckley PJ, Clegg J, Wang C (2002) The impact of inward FDI on the performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. J Int Bus Stud 33(4):637–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caves RE (1992) Industrial efficiency in six nations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciccone A, Papaioannou E (2009) Human capital, the structure of production, and growth. Rev Econ Stat 91(1):66–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doctor M (2007) Boosting investment and growth: the role of social pacts in the Brazilian automotive industry. Oxf Dev Stud 35(1):105–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Epifani P, Gancia G (2008) The skill bias of world trade. Econ J 118(530):927–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feliciano ZM (2001) Workers and trade liberalization: the impact of trade reforms in Mexico on wages and employment. Ind Labor Relat Rev 55(1):95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao T (2005) Labor quality and the location of foreign direct investment: evidence from China. China Econ Rev 16(3):274–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrison R (2008) Skill-based technology adoption: firm-level evidence from Brazil and India. Institute for Fiscal Studies, IFS working papers: W08/03Google Scholar
  13. Helpman E (ed) (1998) General purpose technologies and economic growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Jung JH, Choi K (2006) The labor market structure of knowledge-based industries: a Korean case. J Asia Pac Econ 11(1):59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kathuria V (2002) Liberalisation, FDI and productivity spillovers – an analysis of Indian manufacturing firms. Oxf Econ Pap 54:688–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim KS (1998) Global integration, capital and labor: a north–south comparative perspective. In: Dabir-Alai P, Odekon M (eds) Economic liberalization and labor markets. Greenwood Press, Westport, pp 25–44Google Scholar
  17. Kokko A, Tansini R, Zejan MC (1996) Local technological capability and productivity spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan manufacturing sector. J Dev Stud 32(4):602–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu Z (2008) Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: theory and evidence. J Dev Econ 85(1–2):176–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maiti D, Mitra A (2010) Skills, informality, and development. IEG working paper no. 306Google Scholar
  20. Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Noorbakhsh F, Paloni A, Youssef A (2001) Human capital and FDI inflows to developing countries: new empirical evidence. World Dev 29(9):1593–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Okada A, Siddharthan NS (2008) Automobile clusters in India: evidence from Chennai and the national capital region. In: Kuchiki A, Tsuji M (eds) The flowchart approach to industrial cluster policy. Palgrave-Macmillan, London, pp 109–144Google Scholar
  23. Pandit BL, Siddharthan NS (2008) MNEs, product differentiation, skills and employment: lessons from the Indian experience. In: Hashim SR, Siddharthan NS (eds) High tech industries, employment and global competitiveness. Routledge, New Delhi, pp 165–179Google Scholar
  24. Ray S (2004) MNEs, strategic alliances and efficiency of firms: emerging trends. Econ Polit Wkly 39(5):434–40Google Scholar
  25. Romer PM (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect 8(1):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2003) Geography, industrial organization and agglomeration. Rev Econ Stat 85(2):377–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salvanes KG, Forre ES (2003) Effects on employment of trade and technical change: evidence from Norway. Economica 70:293–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Siddharthan NS, Lal K (2004) Liberalisation, MNE and productivity of Indian enterprises. Econ Polit Wkly 39(5):448–452Google Scholar
  29. Yeaple SR (2003) The role of skill endowments in the structure of U.S. outward foreign direct investment. Rev Econ Stat 85(3):726–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yussof I, Ismail R (2002) Human resource competitiveness and inflow of foreign direct investment to the ASEAN region. Asia-Paci Develop J 9(1):89–107Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amrita School of BusinessBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Madras School of EconomicsChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations