Biofertiliser (Mycorrhiza) Technology in Mine Ecorestoration

  • Subodh Kumar Maiti


The coal mine overburden (OB) materials vary widely in their physical, chemical and biological properties than natural soil, which affect the plant establishment, survival and growth. To reclaim these OB dumps biologically, a long-term nutrient cycling between soil and plant has to be established. The long-term plant community stability on OB dumps relies upon the development of a functional soil microbial community. Soil microorganisms are responsible for (a) decomposition of plant litter, (b) mineralisation of essential plant nutrients, (c) nutrient cycling, (e) accumulation of organic matter and (f) beneficial changes of soil physical characteristics. One group of soil microorganisms important to the development of long-term plant community structure is mycorrhizal fungi. The absence of mycorrhiza may account for the poor survival of plant used for OB dump reclamation. To reclaim overburden dumps biologically, several types of biofertiliser are being used. Biofertiliser are defined as ‘fertiliser of biological origin’. The biofertiliser can be broadly classified into three categories (Mukhopadhyay and Maiti 2009):


Mycorrhizal Fungus Mycorrhizal Association Spore Count Mycorrhizal Inoculation Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhiza 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allen EB, Allen ME (1980) Natural re-establishment of VAM following strip-mine reclamation in Wyoming. J Appl Ecol 17:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duvert PR, Perrin R, Plenchette C (1990) Soil receptiveness to VA Mycorrhizal association: concept and method. Plant and Soil 124:1–6Google Scholar
  3. Gaur A, Adholeya A (1994) Estimation of VAMF spores in soil: a modified method. Mycorrhiza News 6(2):10–11Google Scholar
  4. Habte M, Munjunath A (1991) Categories of vesicular-arbuscular dependency of host species. Mycorrhiza 1:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Juwarkar AS, Malhotra AS (1994) Manganese mine spoil dump reclamation using pressmud and biofertilizer—a case study. In: Banerjee SP (ed) Minerals and ecology. Oxford/IBH, Calcutta, pp 95–102Google Scholar
  6. Juwarkar AS et al (1994) Reclamation of coal mine spoil dump through integrated biotechnology approach. In: Shringarputale SB et al. (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on environmental issues of mineral industries. VNIT, Nagpur, CSM, Oxford/IBH Pub Co Pvt Ltd., New Delhi, pp 121–136Google Scholar
  7. Killham K (1994) Soil Ecology. CUP, Cambridge. p 242Google Scholar
  8. Maiti SK (1997) Importance of VAM fungi in coalmine overburden reclamation & factors effecting the establishment of VAM Fungi on overburden dumps. Environ Ecol 15(3):602–608Google Scholar
  9. Maiti SK (2006) An assessment of overburden dump rehabilitation technologies adopted in CCL, NCL, MCL and SECL Mines. Report sub MOEF (India) no. J-15012/38/98-IA II (M)Google Scholar
  10. Maiti SK (2007) Minesoil properties of different aged reclaimed coalmine overburden dumps of Korba, Gevra and Kusmunda area of SECL, India. Minetech 28(2 &3):93–98Google Scholar
  11. Maiti SK, Shee C (2003) Status of VAM infections and spores in an afforested coalmine overburden dumps—a case study from Jharia coalfield. In: Srivastava BK et al (eds) Proceedings of the environmental management in mines. Mining Engineering Department, BHU, Varanasi, pp 257–262Google Scholar
  12. Maiti SK, Singh G (2006) Ecorestoration status of coalmine overburden dumps in Korba, Gevra and Kusmunda area of SECL, India. In: Shringarputale SB et al (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on environmental issues of mineral industries. VNIT, Nagpur and CSM, pp 217–224Google Scholar
  13. Maiti SK, Shee C, Jha PC (2003) Status of VAMF- infections and spores in an afforested coalmine overburden dump. Minetech 24(4):48–53Google Scholar
  14. Mosse B et al. (1981) Ecology of mycorrhiza and mycorrhiza fungi. In: Alexander M (ed) Advances in Microbial Ecology, vol. 5. Plenum Press, pp 137–210Google Scholar
  15. Mukhopadhyay S, Maiti SK (2009) Reclamation of mine spoils with Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhiza (VAM) fungi—a review. Environ Ecol 27(2):642–649Google Scholar
  16. Mukhopadhyay S, Maiti SK (2010) Natural mycorrhizal colonization in tree species growing on the reclaimed coalmine overburden dumps: case study from Jharia Coalfields, India. Bioscan 3:761–770Google Scholar
  17. Norland MR (1993) Soil factors affecting mycorrhizal use in surface mine reclamation. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of mines, Information Circular/9345. p 21Google Scholar
  18. Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing and staining parasitic and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc 55:158–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Powell CL (1984) Field inoculation with VA mycorrhizal fungi. In: Powell CL, Bagyaraj DJ (eds) VA mycorrhiza. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 205–222Google Scholar
  20. Schenk NC, Perez Y (1988) Manual for the identification of VA mycorrhizal fungi. International culture collection of VA mycorrhiza fungi, Florida, p 241Google Scholar
  21. Smith SE, Pearson VG (1988) Physiological interactions between symbionts in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39:221–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tisdall JM (1991) Fungal hyphae and structural stability of soil. Aus J Soil Res 29(6):729–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subodh Kumar Maiti
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian School of Mines Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringCentre for Mining EnvironmentDhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations