Skip to main content

Investigation of Functional Microbial Diversity and Related Abiotic Factors in Coastal and Desert Ecosystem of Gujarat

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Prospects in Bioscience: Addressing the Issues
  • 1246 Accesses

Abstract

Soil microbial diversity is of utmost importance for functioning of any ecosystem. Samples from coastal region of Gujarat, that is, from Alang, Daman, Mandvi, Okha, Porbandar and Veraval, and from desert areas of Bhuj, Dhordo and Khavda were collected. The purpose of our study was enumeration and functional diversity analysis of 14 functional microbial groups of microorganisms present in both ecosystems and correlation of microbial data with abiotic parameters as well as with important soil enzyme activities. Functional diversity was analysed using CLPP. Finally, correlation between abiotic parameters and microbial data was done using SPSS, and various diversity indices values were calculated. We concluded that in comparison to coastal soil, desert soil exhibited high diversity, total activity and richness. PCA analysis displayed that coastal samples were clustered together, while the desert samples were separated from each other and from the coastal samples group. The coastal sites of Okha, Porbandar and Veraval seemed to be deteriorating with low microbial diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kennedy AC, Smith KL. Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils. Plant Soil. 1998;170:75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Margalef R. Information theory in ecology. Gen Syst. 1958;3:36–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zak JC, Willig MR, Moorhead DL, Wildman HG. Functional diversity of microbial communities: a quantitative approach. Soil Biol Biochem. 1994;26(9):1101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Menhinick EF. A comparison of some species – individual diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology. 1964;45:859–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pielou EC. Mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley; 1977. 385 p.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lorch HJ, Lorenz S, Ottow JCG. Populationsdichten verschiedener Bakteriengruppen in einer belǘfteten Abwasserteichanlage. Forum Städte-Hyg. 1990;41:133–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tiedje JM, Sextone AJ, Parkin TB, Revsbech NP, Shelton DR. Anaerobic process in soil. Plant Soil. 1984;76:197–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Joanne MW, Linda MS, Christopher JW. Prescott, Harley and Klein’s microbiology. 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008. p. 519–642.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez H, Fraga R, Gonzalez T, Bashan Y. Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving in plant growth promoting bacteria. Plant Soil. 2004;102:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Subba Rao NS. Soil microbiology. 4th ed. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publication; 2008. p. 292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Atlas RM, Bartha R. Microbial ecology. Fundamentals and applications. 6th ed. New York: Benjamin Cummings Publishing; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sollins P, Crowmack Jr K, Li CY, Fogel R. Role of low-molecular weight organic acids in the inorganic nutrition of fungi and higher plants. In: Carroll GC, Wicklow DT, editors. The fungal community: its organization and role in ecosystem. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1981. p. 607–19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lawrence JR, Gupta VVSR, Germida JJ. Impact of elemental sulphur fertilization on agricultural soils effects on sulphur oxidizing populations and oxidation rates. Can J Soil Sci. 1988;68:475–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maria V, Mercedes S, Vicente B, Encarnación J, Lana N, Vanessa M, Nikolay V. Multifunctional properties of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms grown on agro-industrial wastes in fermentation and soil conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;85:1287–99.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Opperman MH, Wood M, Harris PJ. Changes in microbial populations following the application of cattle slurry to soil at two temperatures. Soil Biol Biochem. 1989;21:263–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bakken LR. Culturable and nonculturable bacteria in soil. In: van Elsas JD, Trevors JT, Wellington EMH, editors. Modern soil microbiology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p. 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heuer H, Wieland G, Schonfeld J, Schnwal der A, Gomes NCM, Smalla K. Bacterial community profiling using DGGE or TGGE analysis. In: Rochelle PA, editor. Environmental molecular microbiology: protocols and applications. Wymondham: Horizon Scientific Press; 2001. p. 177–90.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rondon MR, August PR, Bettermann AD, Brady SF, Grossman TH, Liles MR, et al. Cloning the soil metagenome: a strategy for accessing the genetic and functional diversity of uncultured microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:2541–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tunlid A, White DC. Biochemical analysis of biomass, community structure, nutritional status, and metabolic activity of microbial communities in soil. In: Stotzky G, Bollag J-M, editors. Soil biochemistry, vol. 7. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992. p. 229–62.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garland JL. Analysis and interpretation of community-level physiological profiles in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1997;24:289–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. West NE, Skujins J. Nitrogen in desert ecosystems. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alef K, Nannipieri P. Enzyme activities. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P, editors. Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. London: Academic Press Ltd; 1995. p. 311–66.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eaton AR, Greenberg AE. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington, DC: American Public health association (APHA); 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoben HJ, Somasegaran P. Comparison of the pour, spread, and drop plate methods for enumeration of Rhizobium spp. in inoculants made from pre-sterilized peat. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;44:51246–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Flemming V, Kjeld I. Improved most-probable-number method to detect sulfate reducing bacteria with natural media and a radiotracer. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64(5):1700.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Burns RG. Enzyme activity in soil: location and a possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biol Biochem. 1982;14:423–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Frankenberger Jr WT, Tabatabai MA. Amidase and urease activity in plants. Plant Soil. 1982;64:153–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Frankenberger Jr WT, Tabatabai MA. L-Asparaginase activity of soils. Biol Fertil Soils. 1991;11:6–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Frankenberger Jr WT, Tabatabai MA. L-glutaminase activity of soils. Biol Fertil Soils. 1991;23:869–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem. 1972;1:301–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Andrea M. Diversity of bacillus like organism isolated from deep sea hyper saline anoxic sediments. Saline Syst. 2008;4:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goodfellow M, Simpson KE. Ecology of streptomycetes. Front Appl Microbiol. 1987;2:97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Whipps JM, Lynch JM. Substrate flow and utilisation in the rhizosphere of cereals. New Phytol. 1983;95:605–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pancholy KS, Rice EL. Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession. Amylase, Cellulase, Invertase, Dehydrogenase and Urease. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1973;37:47–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Privalov PL, Tsalkova TN. Micro-stabilities and macro-stabilities of globular-proteins. Nature. 1979;280:693–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cookson P. Variation in phosphatase activity in soil: a case study. Agric Sci. 2002;7:65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Caruso G. Leucine amino peptidase, β-glucosidase and alkaline phosphatase activity rates and their significance in nutrient cycles in some coastal mediterranean sites. Mar Drugs. 2010;8:916–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to Nirma Education and Research Foundation (NERF) for funding the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Munshi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Biswas, D., Mandal, A., Akbari, H., Munshi, N. (2012). Investigation of Functional Microbial Diversity and Related Abiotic Factors in Coastal and Desert Ecosystem of Gujarat. In: Sabu, A., Augustine, A. (eds) Prospects in Bioscience: Addressing the Issues. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0810-5_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics