Technologies for Sustainable Development: Korean Experience



Since the dawn of new millennium, concept of sustainable development is featured as core element of policy documents of more and more governments. The concepts of sustainable development and globalization are interwoven. More specifically, the interactions between technologies and natural resources have significant implications for sustainable development. Innovation ecosystem plays an important role in development of technologies in the context of sustainable development. In the ecosystem of innovation, universities and research institutions are critical players apart from industries and investors. There are only a few examples of critical technologies addressing sustainable development in the areas of energy, water, environment, and education. Korea has successfully developed some of these technologies and has implemented them at few locations. The lessons learned from implementation of these technologies for a specific region suggest the need for a right framework for effective technology management.


Sustainable Development Chemical Oxygen Demand Aeration Tank Social Entrepreneurship Innovation Ecosystem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abdul Kalam APJ (2011) Technology to provide clean drinking water. www. Accessed May 2012
  2. Abdul Kalam APJ, Singh SP (2011) Target 3 billion: innovative solutions towards sustainable development. Penguin Group, New Delhi, pp 34–35Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed A, Stein JA (2004) Science, technology and sustainable development. World Rev Sci Technol Sustain Dev 1(1):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali M, Park K (2011) The spiral model of indigenous technological innovation capabilities for developing countries. Afr J Bus Manage 5(7):2874–2889Google Scholar
  5. Amrit Pal Singh (2010) Going with the flow, Case Study - Tata Swatch, pitch CMO Summit. http://pitchonnetcom/blog/2010/12/06/pitch-cmo-summit-2010-case-study-tata-swach. Accessed May 2012
  6. Arslanhan S, Kurtsal Y (2010) To what South Korea owes success in innovations: TEPAV policy note, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  7. Azapagic A, Perdan S (2000) Indicator of sustainable development for industry: a general framework. Trans Icheme 78(b):243–261Google Scholar
  8. Biswas D, Amrita Saurabh P, Das P (2010) The education-enterprise model and its interaction to Indian healthcare sector, Combi2010. Laurea Publications, Vantaa, pp 210–225Google Scholar
  9. Brent AC, Pretorius MW (2007) Sustainable development: a conceptual framework for the technology management field of knowledge and a departure for further research. In: IAMOT 2007 16th international conference on management of technology proceedings. World Scientific Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
  10. Brent AC, Heuberger R, Manzini D (2005) Evaluating projects that are potentially eligible for Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) funding in the South African context. Environ Dev Econ 10(5):631–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brent AC, Van Erck RPG, Labuschagne C (2006) Sustainability cost accounting: Part 1 – A monetary procedure to evaluate the sustainability of technologies in the South African process industry. S Afri J Ind Eng 17(2):35–51Google Scholar
  12. Briassoulis H (2001) Sustainable development and its indicators: through a (planner’s) glass darkly. J Environ Plan Manage 44(3):409–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chun-Wang W, Hung I-C, Chen LLN-S (2011) A joyful classroom learning system with robot learning companion for children to learn mathematics multiplication. Turk Online J Educ Technol 10(2):11–12Google Scholar
  14. Debora Jackson J (2011) What is an innovation ecosystem? National Science Foundation, Arlington, pp 5–9Google Scholar
  15. Etzkowitz H (2007) The triple helix model of innovation: University-Industry-Government Business School, Newcastle University, 51st EOQ Congress, Prague, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  16. Etzkowitz H, Dzisah J, Ranga M, Zhou C (2007) The triple helix model of innovation: university-industry-government interaction. Tech Monit 14:14–22Google Scholar
  17. Han J, Jo M, Jones V, Jo JH (2008) Comparative study on the educational use of home robots for children. J Inf Process Syst 4(4):159–166Google Scholar
  18. Kamyotra JS, Bhardwaj RM (2011) Municipal wastewater management in India: India infrastructure report 2011 on Water: policy and performance for sustainable development. IDFC, pp 299–310Google Scholar
  19. Kates R, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA (2005) What is sustainable development: goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 47(3):9–21Google Scholar
  20. Labuschagne C, Brent AC, Claasen SJ (2005) Environmental and social impact considerations for sustainable project life cycle management in the process industry. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 12(1):38–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Low Cost Water Purifiers (2011) Accessed May 2012
  22. Lucas Manuela SE (2004) How can we make globalization work for sustainable development?
  23. Mebratu D (1998) Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 18:493–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Netwerk TWA (2011) International science business belt to the future Korean Nobel Prize winner, 27 Dec 2011
  25. Saurabh, PA, Biswas D (2009) The need for co-creating sustainable business models under the education-enterprise (E-E) framework. In: EBRF conference-2009, University of Jyvaskyla, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  26. Saurabh P, Kumar S, Biswas D (2011) From innovation to industry creation: chartering the role, impact and performance of government innovation programs at higher educational institutions in India. In: Proceeding papers of Triple Helix IX international conference.
  27. Stein JA (2002) Globalization, science, technology and policy. Sci Publ Policy 29(6):402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sung Chul Chung (2011) Innovation, competitiveness, and growth: Korean experiences. In: Annual World Bank conference on development economics – Global 2010, on Lessons from East Asia and the Global Financial Crisis. World Bank, p 333Google Scholar
  29. United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) (2001) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. Accessed June 2012

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indo-Korea Science and Technology Center (IKST)BangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations