Abstract
This chapter is about reaching out to users of public services from operational levels in the public sector. Its starting point is the need for focus and commitment to create outcomes of value to citizens. This chapter examines the use of logic models to help structure feasible proposals. Such models focus on defining paths to desired impacts and help turn intangible resources into tangible results. This chapter proposes that logic models can help managers and staff to think about opportunities to implement development goals by improving focus, accountability, feasibility and targeting. It suggests that such initiatives may also help find funds, win support from senior managers and political leaders, provide a basis for consultation with users and create resources with which to generate continuing streams of innovation in the formulation and delivery of public services in developing countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Austhink. Retrieved 24 June 2011, from http://rationale.austhink.com/
Department of Treasury and Finance, Victoria, Australia (2009) Investment management. Retrieved 24 June 2011, from http://www.dtf.vic.gov.au/CA25713E0002EF43/pages/investment-management-home
Douglas JV (2008) Tongue-tied, fund starved. Australian Financial Review, 25 Apr
Hagel J III, Brown JS, Davison L (2010) The power of pull. Basic Books, New York
Hodgkinson S (2007, Aug 24) Keep it simple. Australian Financial Review
Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2004) Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, p 8
Minto B (1996) The pyramid principle. Minto International, London
Mintzberg H (1996) Managing government, governing management. Harvard Business Review, May-June
Moore MH (1995) Creating public value. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Moore MH (Speaker) (2008) Recognizing public value: the challenge of measuring government performance (Presentation notes). Institute of Public Administration Australia, Victoria, 24 Jan
Problem solving with the McKinsey method. Retrieved 15 Nov 2006, from www.mccombs.utexas.edu/students/gcg/CaseGuides/MCKINSEY%20PROBLEM%20SOLVING%20APPROACH%20(V2).ppt. Link no longer operative, similar references. Retrieved 28 June 2011, from faculty.fullerton.edu/pchan/590/591lecturenotes.ppt, mktarcadia.com/attachment/1313411620.ppt, interactive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/strategy/…/skills/s_issue.htm
Rasiel E, Friga PN (2002) The McKinsey mind. McGraw Hill, New York
Zukang S (2010) Overview: keeping the promise. In: The millennium development goals, report 2010. United Nations, New York. Retrieved 24 June 2011, from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG%20Report%202010%20En%20r15%20-low%20res%2020100615%20-.pdf
Acknowledgement
Grateful acknowledgement is made to two former senior officers in the Victorian Public Service for directing me to pyramid logic and investment logic maps.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, R. (2013). Epilogue: Thinking About Reaching Out: Analytical Approaches to Develop Feasible Projects. In: Singh, A., Gonzalez, E., Thomson, S. (eds) Millennium Development Goals and Community Initiatives in the Asia Pacific. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0760-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0760-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, India
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-0759-7
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-0760-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)