Abstract
Recent trends in carrying out deterministic safety analysis for safety assessment are attracting more attention for the use of best estimate approach. However, conservative approaches are still used in licensing safety analysis. The best estimate approach provides more realistic information with respect to conservative approach for predictions of physical behaviour and provides information about the existing safety margins and between the results of calculation and regulatory acceptance criteria, whereas conservative approach also does not give any indication about actual plant behaviour, including time scale, for preparation of emergency operating procedures. Best estimate methodology results are affected by various sources of uncertainty like code or model uncertainty, representation uncertainty, scaling uncertainty and plant uncertainty. Therefore, uncertainty in the results due to unavoidable approximation in the modelling should be quantified. Various uncertainty analysis methodologies have been emerged after the development of code scaling, applicability and uncertainty (CSAU) by US NRC in 1989, like CIAU by Italy and GRS by Germany. This chapter deals with the sources of uncertainty and its quantifications by various methodologies in terms of confidence and probability. This chapter also deals with the application of a sampling-based uncertainty evaluation in the best estimate analysis of station blackout and small break LOCA in integral test facilities carried out under the framework of IAEA CRP. Uncertainty evaluation for TMI-II accident has been carried out using this methodology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AERB safety Code (2009) Design of pressurized heavy water reactor based nuclear power plants, no. AERB/NPP-PHWR/SC/D (Rev. 1), Mumbai
D’Auria F, Bousbia-Salah A, Petuzzi A, Del Nevo A (2006) State of the art in using best estimate calculation tools in nuclear technology. Nucl Eng Technol 38(1):11–32
Dubey SK, Rao RS, Sengupta S, Gupta SK (2011) Sampling based uncertainty analysis of station blackout in PSB VVER integral test facility. Ann Nucl Energy 38:2724–2733
Gupta SK (2009) Final progress report on IAEA CRP on uncertainty evaluation in best estimate accident analysis of NPPs, Mumbai
Helton JC (2006) Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:1175–1209
IAEA safety report series (2008) Best estimate safety analysis for nuclear power plants: uncertainty evaluation, IAEA, Vienna
Montgomery DC, Runger GC (1994) Applied statistics and probability for engineers. Wiley, New York
Park SR, Baek WP, Chang SH, Lee BH (1992) Development of uncertainty quantification method of the best estimate large LOCA analysis. Nucl Eng Des 135:367–378
Report by OECD Support Group (2001) Validation matrix for the assessment of thermal hydraulic codes for VVER LOCA and transients, NEA/CSNI/R 4
Sengupta S, Dubey SK, Rao RS, Gupta SK, Raina VK (2010) Sampling based uncertainty analysis of 10 % hot leg break LOCA in LSTF. Nucl Eng Technol 42(6):690–703
Taylor JR (1982) An introduction to error analysis-the study of uncertainty in physical measurements. Oxford University Press, Mill Valley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gupta, S.K., Dubey, S.K., Rao, R.S. (2013). Uncertainty Evaluation in Best Estimate Accident Analysis of NPPs. In: Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharya, G. (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering under Uncertainty: Safety Assessment and Management (ISEUSAM - 2012). Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0757-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0757-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, India
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-0756-6
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-0757-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)