Design-Technology and Sustainability

Conference paper


The chapter explores the use, purpose and appropriateness of technology in the design process. From a sustainability perspective, factors such as diversity, creativity and skill are fundamental for innovation (competition and survival). In addition to formalizing guidelines for the role of technology in the design process, the chapter discusses the role of both the designer and the design-technology in the co-operative complex involved in generating, capturing and storing ideas. In addition, capability approach has been adopted to discern this relationship further.


Design Process Capability Approach Design Morphology Human Capability Basic Capability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alkire S (2005) Briefing note-capabilities and functionings: definitions and justification. Human Development and Capability Association. Accessed April 27, 2012
  2. Amheim R (1969) Visual thinking. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Bilda Z, Gero JS (2005) Do we need CAD during conceptual design? In: Martens B, Brown A (eds) Computer aided architectural design futures: proceedings of the 11th international CAAD futures conference held at the Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 20–22 June 2005, pp 155–164. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks FP Jr (2010) The design of design: essays from a computer scientist. Addison-Wesley Professional, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  5. Buxton W, Myers BA (1986) A study in two-handed input. In: Mantei M, Orbeton P (eds) CHI ’86 Proceedings of the SIGCHI (Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction) conference on human factors in computing systems, Boston, MA, USA, 13–17 April 1986. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 321–326Google Scholar
  6. Coons SA (1963) An outline of the requirement for a computer aided design system. In: Johnson EC (ed) AFIPS ’63 (Spring) Proceedings of the May 21–23, 1963, spring joint computer conference, Detroit, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 299–304Google Scholar
  7. Cross N, Dorst K (1999) Co-evolution of problem and solution spaces in creative design. In: Gero J, Maher M (eds) Computational models of creative design IV. Key Centre of Design, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  8. DeGregori TR (1989) A theory of technology: continuity and change in human development. Affiliated East-West Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorta T, Pe´rez E, Lesage A (2008) The ideation gap: hybrid tools, design flow and practice. Des Stud 29(2):121–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferguson ES (1992) Engineering and the mind’s eye. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsu W, Woon IMY (1998) Current research in the conceptual design of mechanical products. Comput Aided Des 30(5):377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (1986) Tradition, conservation and development: occasional newsletter of the commission on ecology’s working group on traditional ecological knowledge. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  13. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (1993) Guide to preparing and implementing national sustainable development strategies and other multi-sectoral environment and development strategies. IUCN, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenkins DL, Martin RR (1993) The importance of free hand sketching in conceptual design: automatic sketch input. In: Hight TK, Stauffer LA (eds) Design theory and methodology, DTM ’93: presented at the 1993 ASME design technical conferences, 5th international conference on design theory and methodology, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 19–22 September 1993, vol 53 of DE series. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 115–128Google Scholar
  15. Larkin JH, Simon HA (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognit Sci 11(1):65–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leonard-Barton D (1995) Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Lipson H, Shpitalni M (2000) Conceptual design and analysis by sketching. J AI Des Manuf 14(5):391–401Google Scholar
  18. McCrone J (1991) The ape that spoke: language and the evolution of the human mind. William Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. McKim RH (1980) Experiences in visual thinking, 2nd edn. Brooks/Cole, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  20. Nussbaum MC (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oosterlaken I (2009) Design for development: a capability approach. Des Issues 25(4):91–102Google Scholar
  22. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design – a systematic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Papanek V (1984) Design for the real world: human ecology and social change, 2nd edn. Thames & Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Puttre M (1993) Gearing up for conceptual design. Mech Eng 115:46–50Google Scholar
  25. Robeyns I (2005) The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J Hum Dev 6(1):93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sayers DL (1941) The mind of the maker, 1st edn. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Schumacher EF (1973) Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered. Blond & Briggs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Sen A (2004) Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation. Fem Econ 10(3):77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tovey M (1989) Drawing and CAD in industrial design. Des Stud 10(1):24–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ullman DG, Wood S, Graig D (1989) The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Preprints of NSF engineering design research conference, University of Massachusetts, DartmouthGoogle Scholar
  31. Veblen TB (1961) The place of science in modern civilization. The Viking Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Weinzapfel G (1973) It might work but will it help? In: Proceedings of the design activity international conference, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Willey DS (1976) Approaches to computer-aided architectural sketch design. Comput Aided Des 8(3):181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WordWeb software (2005) Version 4. Princeton University, Princeton. Retrieved on July 10, 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Sustainable TechnologiesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Sustainable Technologies and Centre for Product Design and ManufacturingIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations