ICT in New Product Development: Revulsion to Revolution

  • Nityesh Bhatt
  • Abhinav Ved
Conference paper


Changing business dynamics have made it mandatory for companies across the sectors to invest in research and development efforts. Awareness about customers’ needs and their quick fulfilment with range of products and services has gained paramount significance in the last decade. Needless to mention that quality, cost and speed to market are important attributes of a product in present red ocean landscape necessitating the deployment of information and communication technologies (ICT) in all spheres of business activities including new product development (NPD). This chapter is based on secondary research. It cites a large number of cases from diverse industries like aviation, apparels, consulting, software, pharmaceuticals, electronics, construction, petroleum, energy and FMCG to conclude that implementation of ICT in NPD leads to tangible business benefits and also helps in strengthening their competitive advantage.


Knowledge Management Quality Function Deployment Virtual Team British Petroleum Electronic Data Capture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barczak G, Sultan F, Hultink EJ (2007) Determinants of IT usage and new product performance. J Prod Innov Manag 24(6):600–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bharadwaj A (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q 24(1):169–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biemans W (2003) A picture paints a thousand numbers: a critical look at b2b product development research. Bus Ind Market 18(6/7):514–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booz, Allen, and Hamilton (1982) New product development in the 1980s. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole-Gomolski B (1997) Early adopters say ‘net messaging slashes mail costs’. Computerworld 31(34):1–12Google Scholar
  6. Coleman D (1997) Groupware-the changing environment. In: Groupware: collaborative strategies for corporate LANs and intranets. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 1–38Google Scholar
  7. Delphi (2011) Retrieved 21 June 2011, from Motoring dreams:
  8. Duff M (2002) Case study: Panasonic searches the Master data for a single version of truth. CIO Insight. Retrieved on 21 Sept 2011. From
  9. Durmusoglu S (2009) The role of top management team’s information technology (IT) infrastructure view on new product development. Euro J Innov 12(3):364–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durmusoglu S, Calantone R, Sambamurthy V (2006) Is more information technology better for new product development? J Prod Brand Manag 15(7):435–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodwin R (2009) State of the science—the new remote data capture paradigm. Retrieved 21 Sept 2011, from Oracle:
  12. Grantham C, Carr J, Coleman D (1997) Groupware in hardware and software development environments. Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANs and Intranets, pp 629–643Google Scholar
  13. Hammer M, Steven S (1999) How process enterprise really work. Howard Bus Rev 7(6):108–118Google Scholar
  14. Haverila M, Ashill N (2011) Market intelligence and NPD success: a study of technology intensive companies in Finland. Market Intel Plan 29(5):556–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howe V, Mathieu RG, Parker J (2000) Supporting new product development with the internet. Ind Manage Data Syst 100(6):277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang X, Soutar GN, Brown A (2004) Measuring new product success: an empirical investigation of Australian SMEs. Ind Mark Manag 33:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ITI (2010) Case studies. Retrieved 27 Sept 2011, from ITI:
  18. Jusco J (2010) New models for product development. Industry Week 30–34Google Scholar
  19. Kanan. 2010. Mahindra to launch motorcycles by 2011. Retrieved 15 June 2011, from Bike advice:
  20. KM and British Petroleum (2011) Retrieved 20 June 2011, from Saic:
  21. Knowledge Management (2010) Retrieved 18 June 2011, from Skyrme:
  22. Larsen and Toubro (2010) Retrieved 9 June 2011, from Epcworld Wide:
  23. Murphy C (2007) Microsoft’s CIO, COO discuss consolidating the company’s IT. Information Week, Retrieved on17 Sept, from Information Week:
  24. National Science Foundation (2007) Research and development Bolsters US Economic Growth. Retrieved on 22 Sept 2011. from NSF:
  25. New Bikes in India (2010) Retrieved 15 June 2011, from Autos maxabout:
  26. New Product Development and Fast Cycle Time (2011) Retrieved 7 June 2011, from new product dynamics:
  27. Newing R (1998) BP Introduces its $250m Digital Nervous System. Financial Times (IT Supplement) 10–11Google Scholar
  28. Oracle (2009) Oracle customer case study. Retrieved 16 Sept 2011, from Oracle:
  29. Oracle (2010) Solutions. Retrieved 16 Sept 2011, from Oracle:
  30. Ottosson S (2004) Dynamic product development – DPD. Technovation 24(3):207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ozer M (2000) Information technology and new product development: opportunities and pitfalls. Ind Mark Manag 29(5):387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Research (2011) Retrieved 20 June 2011, from IBM:
  33. Salomone T (1996) What every engineer should know about concurrent engineering. Manufact Eng 75(3):110Google Scholar
  34. Shravan (2009) Motor cycle news. Retrieved 15 June 2011, from India travel:
  35. Sivadas E, Dwyer F (2000) An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. J Market 64(1):31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Snyder CR, Sankar C (1998) Use of information technologies in the process of building the boeing 777. J Inform Technol Manage IX:3–43Google Scholar
  37. Stark J (1992) Engineering information management systems: beyond CAD/CAM to concurrent engineering support. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Stark J (1998) Concurrent engineering. Retrieved 9 June 2011, from John stark:
  39. Success (2011) Retrieved 20 June 2011, from Siemens:
  40. Sweetman B (1996) As smooth as silk. Air Transp World 33(8):71–78Google Scholar
  41. Takeuchi H, Nonaka I (1986) The new product development game. Harv Bus Rev 64(1):137–146Google Scholar
  42. Unbreakable Virtual Toys (2010) Retrieved 22 June 2011, from Aigamedev:
  43. United Arrow (2011) Retrieved 20 June 2011, from SAP: Scholar
  44. Venture navigator (2007) Product development stages. Retrieved 20 Aug 2011, from Venture navigator:
  45. Vonderembse M, Raghunathan T, Rao S (1997) A post-industrial paradigm: to integrate and automate manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 35:2579–2599CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ManagementNirma UniversityAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations