Advertisement

Work Behaviors of Korean and Indian Engineers: A Study of Comparison

  • M. K. Sridhar
  • Paul Jeong
Conference paper

Abstract

Cultural understanding is a key issue in the development of international or cross border business. The greatest challenge to international business today is the management of business operations across cultural boundaries. In recent years, knowledge-based software business is facing very unusual problems of cross-cultural and work-related behavior issues. Such problems are found to be the major cause for software joint-development business failures between any two countries. This chapter explores the major differences in work-related behavior between South Korean and Indian engineers in knowledge-based software business.

Keywords

High Orientation Work Behavior Emotion Factor Behavioral Domain Medium Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abraham LR (2009) Cultural differences in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual conference on India Software Engineering Conference, Pune, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Borchers G (2003) The software engineering impacts of cultural factors on multi-cultural software development teams. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on software engineering (ICSE’03). IEEE, Los Alamitos, pp 540–545Google Scholar
  3. Cho J (2007) Globalization and global software development. Issues Inf Syst VIII(2):287–290Google Scholar
  4. Gregory R, Prifling M, Beck R (2008) Managing cross-cultural dynamics in it offshore outsourcing relationship, the role of cultural intelligence. In: Second information systems workshop on global sourcing: services, knowledge and innovationGoogle Scholar
  5. Herbsleb JD, Moitra D (2001) Global software development. Lucent Technologies. IEEE Softw 18(2):16–20Google Scholar
  6. Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work related values. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofstede G (1984) Culture’s consequences. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang H, Trauth E (2007) Cultural influences and globally distributed information systems development: experiences from Chinese IT professionals. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMIS-CPR Conference, St Louis, Missouri, USA, pp 36–45, April 2007Google Scholar
  9. Ifinedo P (2004) Challenges in software and information systems development in multi-site and multi-cultural ambience. Proceedings of the 9th AIM conference, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  10. Krishna SS, Walsham G (2004) Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing. Commun ACM 47(4):62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Myers MD, Tan FB (2002) Beyond models of national culture in information systems research. J Global Inf Manage 10:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Onesimo A, Murphy EF, Greenwood RA et al (2008) A preliminary exploration of generational similarities and differences in values between the United States, United Kingdom, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Colombia and the Philippines. DLSU Bus Econ Rev 18(1):29–46Google Scholar
  13. Perlow L, Weeks J (2002) Who’s helping whom, layers of culture and workplace behavior. J Organ Behav 23:345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ros M (1999) Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Appl Psychol Int Rev 48(I):49–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Routamaa V, Hautala TM, Mohsin M (2007) Managing cultural differences: values and work goals in culture and personality contexts. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference creativity & innovation, Kyoto Japan: imperatives for global business and developmentGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karnataka JnanaAayoga, Government of KarnatakaBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Indo – Korea Science & Technology CenterBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations