Advertisement

Leveraging Strategic Change with Continuity

Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

Continuity and change have always served as backbone of both strategic thinking and practice, in some form or the other. Previously, when business environment was stable, the strategies were largely evolved around the issue of “continuity.” Some important strategies in this respect are that of “continuity” and “logical incrementalism.” The organizations used to form strategies so as to survive and grow by maintaining continuity in their business domain. The strategy of “incrementalism” also focuses on continuity with an incremental change to dynamically evolve over time. Stability and longevity used to be considered as principal criteria of success. However, in the last few decades, globalization processes made the business environment highly turbulent, and the concern for “change” has received immense interest, both by strategic thinkers and practitioners. Many new theories, such as regenerating strategy, strategic change and transformation, complexity and chaos, and blue ocean strategy, have taken the center stage. But even in a highly turbulent and chaotic business environment, a discontinuous change may not always be desirable, as it might be risk prone and may also fuel the fire of turbulence and chaos. Further, it has been observed that success rate of strategic change initiatives of different kinds such as restructuring, reengineering, and strategic transformation has not been encouraging in a variety of contexts globally. This has prompted for a fresh reappraisal of strategic thinking and practice to introspect about significance of continuity in leveraging effectiveness of change.

Keywords

Flowing Stream Change Force Strategic Change Strategic Thinking Strategic Flexibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bianco, A. T., & Schermerhorn, J., Jr. (2006). Self regulation, strategic leadership and paradox in organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birnkshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47–55.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, L. T., & Cheney, G. (2000). Self-absorption and self-seduction in the corporate identity game. In M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch, & M. H. Larsen (Eds.), The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand (pp. 246–270). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Coates, J. F. (2007). Management from A to Z: 2057. Research-Technology Management, 50(1), 32–34.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, J. R., & Porras, J. I. (1994). Built to last. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  6. Drucker, P. F. (1999). Management challenges for the 21st century. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  7. Falcioni, J. G. (2008, June). Virgil carter, bidding adieu. Mechanical Engineering-CIME, pp. 1–3Google Scholar
  8. Gertstner, L., Jr. (2004). Who says elephants can’t dance. London: Harper Collins Publication.Google Scholar
  9. Gioia, D. A. (1998). From individual to organizational identity. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 17–32). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gustafson, L. T., & Reger, R. K. (1995). Using organizational identity to achieve stability and change in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 464–468.Google Scholar
  11. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  12. Harreld, J. B., O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2006). Dynamic capabilities at IBM: Driving strategy into action. White Paper Draft. www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/dynamic-pcapabilities.pdf
  13. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston: HBS Press.Google Scholar
  14. Martinez, C. A. (1997). Transforming the legacy of sears. Strategy and Leadership, 25(4), 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mintzberg, H. (1987, July–August). Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review, pp. 66–75.Google Scholar
  16. Mintzberg, H. (1994). Rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nasim, S., & Sushil. (2011). Revisiting organizational change: Exploring the paradox of managing continuity and change. Journal of Change Management, 1(2), 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pettigrew, A. M. (2000). Linking change processes to outcomes. In M. Beer & N. Nohria (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (pp. 243–266). Boston: HBS Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sturdy, A., & Grey, C. (2003). Beneath and beyond organizational change management: Exploring alternatives. Organization, 10, 651–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sushil. (1997). Flexible systems management: An evolving paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(4), 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sushil. (2001). SAP-LAP framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2(1), 51–59.Google Scholar
  23. Sushil. (2005). Flexible strategy framework for managing continuity and change. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 1(1), 22–32.Google Scholar
  24. Sushil. (2012a). Flowing stream strategy: Managing confluence of continuity and change. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(1), 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sushil. (2012b). Making flowing stream strategy work. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1).Google Scholar
  26. Volberda, H. W. (1997). Building flexible organization for fast moving markets. Long Range Planning, 30(2), 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Volberda, H. W. (1998). Building the flexible firm: How to remain competitive. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India Pvt. Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sushil
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management StudiesIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations