Disguising the Leaf Surface

  • P. Parvatha Reddy


The leaf surface provides the first barrier that fungi must overcome in order to gain access to the leaf, but it also provides chemical and physical cues that are necessary for the development of infection structures for many fungal pathogens. Film-forming polymers can coat the leaf surface, acting not just as an extra barrier to infection but also disguising the cues necessary for germling development. Kaolin particle films can envelop the leaf in a hydrophobic particle film barrier that prevents spores or water from directly contacting the leaf surface and, as a result, can suppress infection. Adhesion of fungal spores to the leaf surface, which is important to keep spores on the leaf surface and for appropriate development of the fungus on the leaf surface, can be inhibited, leading to reduced infection and lesion development. Polymer and particle films have been shown to provide disease control in the field, whilst research on agents that inhibit spore adhesion on leaf surfaces is still in its infancy. There is an urgent need for research on the practicality of using these novel methods under field conditions and on ways of integrating them into current crop protection programmes.


Powdery Mildew Leaf Surface Downy Mildew Fire Blight Apple Scab 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bowen P, Menzies J, Ehret D, Samuels L, Glass ADM (1992) Soluble silicon sprays inhibit powdery mildew development in grape leaves. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117:906–912Google Scholar
  2. Elad Y, Ziv O, Aynish N, Katan J (1989) The effect of film-forming polymers on powdery mildew of cucumber. Phytoparasitica 17:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Franck A, Bar-Joseph M (1992) Use of netting and whitewash spray to protect papaya plants against Nivun Haamir (NH)-dieback disease. Crop Prot 11:525–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gale J, Poljakoff-Mayber A (1962) Prophylactic effect of a plant transpirant. Phytopathology 52:715–717Google Scholar
  5. Gamliel A, Skutelski Y, Peretz-Alon Y, Becker E (2001) Soil solarization using sprayable plastic polymers to control soil-borne pathogens in field crops. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual international research conference on methyl bromide alternatives and emission reduction, San Diego, CA, pp 10.1–10.3Google Scholar
  6. Glenn DM, Puterka GJ, van der Zwet T, Byers RE, Feldhake C (1999) Hydrophobic particle films: a new paradigm for suppression of arthropod pests and plant diseases. J Econ Entomol 92:759–771Google Scholar
  7. Glenn DM, Puterka GJ, Drake SR, Unruh TR, Knight AL, Baherle P, Prado E, Baugher T (2001a) Particle film application influences apple leaf physiology, fruit yield, and fruit quality. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126:175–181Google Scholar
  8. Glenn DM, van der Zwet T, Puterka G, Gundrum P, Brown E (2001b) Efficacy of kaolin-based particle films to control apple diseases. Plant Health Prog. doi: 10.1094/PHP-2001-0823-01-RS
  9. Gumpf DJ, Oldfield GN, Yokomi RK (1981) Progress in the control of citrus stubborn disease. Proc Int Soc Citric 1:457–458Google Scholar
  10. Haggag WM (2002) Application of epidermal coating antitranspirants for controlling cucumber downy mildew in greenhouse. Plant Prot Bull 11:69–78Google Scholar
  11. Hsich TF, Huang JW (1999) Effect of film-forming polymers on control of lily blight caused by Botrytis elliptica. Eur J Plant Pathol 105:501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamp M (1985) Control of Erysiphe cichoracearum on Zinnia elegans, with a polymer based antitranspirant. Hortic Sci 20:879–881Google Scholar
  13. Lalancette N, Belding RD, Shearer PW, Frecon JL, Tietjen WH (2005) Evaluation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic particle films for peach crop arthropod and disease management. Pest Mange Sci 61:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lowery DT, Sears MK, Harmer CS (1990) Control of turnip mosaic virus of rutabaga with applications of oil, whitewash, and insecticides. J Econ Entomol 83:2352–2356Google Scholar
  15. Marco S (1993) Incidence of non-persistently transmitted viruses in pepper sprayed with whitewash, oil, and insecticide, alone or combined. Plant Dis 77:1119–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mendgen K, Schiewe A, Falconi C (1992) Biological control of plant diseases. In: Biological crop protection symposium, 24 May 1991. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer 45/1992,1Google Scholar
  17. Menzies J, Bowen P, Ehret D, Glass ADM (1992) Foliar applications of potassium silicate reduce severity of powdery mildew on cucumber, muskmelon, and zucchini squash. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117:902–905Google Scholar
  18. Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (1997) Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann Bot 79:667–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Percival GC, Boyle S (2009) Evaluation of film forming polymers to control apple scab [Venturia inaequalis (Cooke) G Wint] under laboratory and field conditions. Crop Prot 28:30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Puterka GJ, Glenn DM, Sekutowski DG, Unruh TR, Jones SK (2000) Progress toward liquid formulations of particle films for insect and disease control in pear. Environ Entomol 29:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Skutelsky Y, Gamliel A, Kritzman G, Peretz-Alon Y, Becker E, Katan J (2000) Soil solarization using sprayable plastic polymers to control soil-borne pathogens in field crops. Phytoparasitica 28:269–270Google Scholar
  22. Smith R (1996) Evaluation of materials for control of bell pepper powdery mildew. Fungicide Nematicide Tests 51:120Google Scholar
  23. Stanley MS, Callow ME, Perry R, Alberte RS, Smith R, Callow JA (2002) Inhibition of fungal spore adhesion by zosteric acid as the basis for a novel, non-toxic crop protection technology. Phytopathology 92:378–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stapleton JJ, Gamliel A (1993) Feasibility of soil fumigation by sealing soil amended with fertilizers and crop residues containing biotoxic volatiles. Plant Prot Q 3:10–13Google Scholar
  25. Sutherland F, Walters DR (2001) In vitro effects of film-forming polymers on the growth and morphology of Pyrenophora avenae and Pyricularia oryzae. J Phytopathol 149:621–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sutherland F, Walters DR (2002) Effect of film-forming polymers on infection of barley with the powdery mildew fungus, Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Euro J Plant Pathol 108:385–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilcox WF, Riegel DG (1997) Evaluation of fungicide programs for control of grapevine powdery mildew. Fungicide Nematicide Tests 52:86Google Scholar
  28. Zekaria-Oren J, Eyal Z (1991) Effect of film-forming compounds on the development of leaf rust on wheat seedlings. Plant Dis 75:231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ziv O (1983) Control of septoria leaf blotch of wheat and powdery mildew of barley with antitranspirant epidermal coating materials. Phytoparasitica 11:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ziv O, Frederiksen RA (1987) The effect of film-forming anti-transpirants on leaf rust and powdery mildew incidence on wheat. Plant Path 36:242–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ziv O, Zitter TA (1992) Effects of bicarbonates and film-forming polymers on cucurbit foliar diseases. Plant Dis 76:513–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Parvatha Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations