• P. Parvatha Reddy


Because of high intensive agricultural practices and chemicalisation of agriculture, the age-old environment-friendly pest management practices like sanitation, crop rotation, mixed cropping, adjustment of date of planting, fallowing, summer ploughing, green manuring, composting, etc., to combat plant pests are not being practised in Indian agriculture. The pace of development and durability of resistant varieties had been slow and unreliable.

Considering these limitations, there have been growing awareness and increasing demand for novel and improved crop protection approaches to guarantee effective and sustainable food production which offers new opportunities for crop protection research. The most recent advances in crop protection include avermectins, bacteriophages, biofumigation, biotechnological approaches, bio-priming of seeds, disguising the leaf surface, non-pathogenic strains, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, soil solarisation, strobilurin fungicides, variety mixtures/cultivar mixtures/multilines, biointensive integrated pest management, pathogenesis-related proteins, RNA interference, fusion protein-based biopesticides, seed mat technology and environmental methods.


Crop Protection Sheath Blight Karnal Bunt Cereal Cyst Nematode Particle Film 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Antoniw JF, Ritter CE, Pierpoint WS, Van Loon LC (1980) Comparison of three pathogenesis-related proteins from plants of two cultivars of tobacco infected with TMV. J Gen Virol 47:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benbrook CM (1996) Pest management at the crossroads. Consumers Union, Yonkers, 272 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Bokshi AI, Morris SC, Deverall BJ (2003) Effects of benzothiadiazole and acetylsalicylic acid on α-1,3-glucanase activity and disease resistance in potato. Plant Pathol 52:22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browning JA, Frey KJ (1981) The multiline concept in theory and practice. In: Jenkyn JF, Plumb RT (eds) Strategies for the control of cereal disease. Blackwell Scientific, London, pp 37–36Google Scholar
  5. Colson-Hanks ES, Allen SJ, Deverall BJ (2000) Effect of 2, 6- dichloroisonicotinic acid or benzothiadiazole on Alternaria leaf spot, bacterial blight and Verticillium wilt in cotton under field conditions. Austr Plant Pathol 29:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conrath U, Pieterse CMJ, Mauch-Mani B (2002) Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 7:210–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coons GH, Kotila JE (1925) The transmissible lytic principle (bacteriophage) in relation to plant pathogens. Phytopathology 15:357–370Google Scholar
  8. Dann EK, Deverall BJ (2000) Activation of systemic disease resistance in pea by an avirulent bacterium or a benzothiadiazole, but not by a fungal leaf spot pathogen. Plant Pathol 49:324–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elmore CL, Roncaroni JA, Giraud DD (1993) Perennial weeds respond to control by soil solarization. Calif Agric 47(1):19–22Google Scholar
  10. Görlach J, Volrath S, Knauf Beiter G, Hengy G, Beckhove U, Kogel KH, Oostendorp M, Staub T, Ward E, Kessman H, Ryals J (1996) Benzothiadiazole, a novel class of inducers of systemic acquired resistance, activates gene expression and disease resistance in wheat. Plant Cell 8:629–643PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gozzo F (2004) Systemic acquired resistance in crop protection. Outlook Pest Manage 2004:20–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jakab G, Cottier V, Touquin V et al (2001) Beta-aminobutyric acid- induced resistance in plants. Eur J Plant Pathol 107:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, London, 31 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Katan J, Greenburger A, Alon H, Grinstein A (1976) Solar heating by polyethylene mulching for control of diseases caused by soil-borne pathogens. Phytopathology 66:683–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1978) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on plant pathogenic bacteria, vol. 2. Station de Pathologie Vegetale et Phytobacteriologie, INRA, Angers, France, pp 879–882Google Scholar
  16. Kotila JE, Coons GH (1925) Investigations on the black leg disease of potato. Michigan Agric Expt Stn Tech Bull 67:3–29Google Scholar
  17. Putter JG, Mac Connell FA, Preiser FA, Haidri AA, Rishich SS, Dybas RA (1981) Avermectins: novel class of insecticides, acaricides and nematicides from a soil microorganism. Experientia 37:963–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sasser JN, Freckman DW (1987) A world perspective on nematology: the role of the society. In: Vetch JA, Dickson DW (eds) Vistas in nematology. Society of Nematologists Inc., Hyattsville, pp 7–14Google Scholar
  19. Soylu S, Baysal O, Soylu EM (2003) Induction of disease resistance by the plant activator, acibenzolar-S methyl (ASM) against bacterial canker (Clavibacter michiganensis sub sp michiganensis) in tomato seedlings. Plant Sci 165:1069–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tally A, Oostendorp M, Lawton K, Staub T, Bassy B (1999) Commercial development of elicitors of induced resistance to pathogens. In: Agrawal AA, Tuzun S, Bent E (eds) Inducible plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores: biochemistry, ecology, and agriculture. American Phytopathological Society Press, St Paul, pp 357–369Google Scholar
  21. Thomas RC (1935) A bacteriophage in relation to Stewart’s disease of corn. Phytopathology 25:371–372Google Scholar
  22. Wolfe MS (1985) The current status and prospects of multiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease control. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23:251–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Parvatha Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations