Abstract
Both premade incisions and “stick and place” are merely surgical techniques with advantages and drawbacks. The surgeon should use and become familiar with both techniques. Although the surgeon’s skill and the surgical team’s skill and experience play a more important role than any surgical technique per se, each technique does have unique advantages over the other in different circumstances. As we use premade sites most of the time, my perspective is biased toward premade sites. The stick-and-place method is currently used by some of the best surgeons producing excellent work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wong, J. (2010). A Debate over Premade Incisions Versus “Stick and Place”. In: Pathomvanich, D., Imagawa, K. (eds) Hair Restoration Surgery in Asians. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99659-0_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99659-0_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-99658-3
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-99659-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)