Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of Demographic Parameters in a Tiger Population from Long-term Camera Trap Data

  • Chapter
Book cover Camera Traps in Animal Ecology

Abstract

Chapter 7 (Karanth et al.) illustrated the use of camera trapping in combination with closed population capture–recapture (CR) models to estimate densities of tigers Panthera tigris. Such estimates can be very useful for investigating variation across space for a particular species (e.g., Karanth et al. 2004) or variation among species at a specific location. In addition, estimates of density continued at the same site(s) over multiple years are very useful for understanding and managing populations of large carnivores. Such multi-year studies can yield estimates of rates of change in abundance. Additionally, because the fates of marked individuals are tracked through time, biologists can delve deeper into factors driving changes in abundance such as rates of survival, recruitment and movement (Williams et al. 2002). Fortunately, modern CR approaches permit the modeling of populations that change between sampling occasions as a result of births, deaths, immigration and emigration (Pollock et al. 1990; Nichols 1992). Some of these early “open population” models focused on estimation of survival rates and, to a lesser extent, abundance, but more recent models permit estimation of recruitment and movement rates as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnason, A. N. 1972. Parameter estimates from mark–recapture experiments on two populations subject to migration and death. Researches on Population Ecology 13:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownie, C., J. E. Hines, J. D. Nichols, K. H. Pollock, and J. B. Hestbeck. 1993. Capture–recapture studies for multiple strata including non-Markovian transition probabilities. Biometrics 49:1173–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P. and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P., D. R. Anderson, G. C. White, C. Brownie, and K. H. Pollock. 1987. Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release–recapture. American Fisheries Society Monograph 5:1–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. and D. G. Miquelle. 2006. Spatial viability analysis of Amur tiger Panthera tigris altaica populations in the Russian Far East: the role of protected areas and landscape matrix in population persistence. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:1056–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapron, G., D. G. Miquelle, A. Lambert, J. M. Goodrich, S. Legendre, and J. Clobert. 2008. The impact on tigers of poaching and prey depletion. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1667–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M. 1964. Estimates of survival from the sightings of marked animals. Biometrika 51:429–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, G. M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture–recapture data with both death and immigration – stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. and R. S. Chundawat. 2002. Ecology of the tiger: implications for population monitoring. Pages 9–21 in K. U. Karanth and J. D. Nichols, editors. Monitoring tigers and their prey: a manual for researchers, managers and conservationists in tropical Asia. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. and J. D. Nichols. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. and J. D. Nichols, editors. 2002. Monitoring tigers and their prey: a manual for researchers, managers and conservationists in tropical Asia. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. and B. M. Stith. 1999. Prey depletion as a critical determinant of tiger population viability. Pages 100–113 in J. Seidensticker, S. Christie, and P. Jackson, editors. Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. and M. E. Sunquist. 2000. Behavioral correlates of predation by tiger, leopard and dhole in Nagarahole, India. Journal of Zoology (London) 250:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U., M. E. Sunquist, and K. M. Chinnappa. 1999. Long term monitoring of tigers: lessons from Nagarahole. Pages 114–122 in J. Seidensticker, S. Christie, and P. Jackson, editors. Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U., J. D. Nichols, N. S. Kumar, W. A. Link, and J. E. Hines. 2004. Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:4854–4858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U., J. D. Nichols, N. S. Kumar, and J. E. Hines. 2006. Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Ecology 87:2925–2937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, W. L., K. H. Pollock, and C. Brownie. 1995. A likelihood-based approach to capture–recapture estimation of demographic parameters under the robust design. Biometrics 51:293–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, W. L., J. D. Nichols, and J. E. Hines. 1997. Estimating temporary emigration using capture–recapture data with Pollock’s robust design. Ecology 78:563–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, J. S., J. L. D. Smith, A. M. Starfield, and C. McDougal. 1995. The long-term effects of tiger poaching on population viability. Conservation Biology 9:1127–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerley, L. L., J. M. Goodrich, D. G. Miquelle, E. N. Smirnov, I. G. Nikolaev, H. B. Quigley, and M. G. Hornocker. 2003. Reproductive parameters of wild female Amur (Siberian) tigers (Panthera tigris altaica). Journal of Mammalogy 84:288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miquelle, D. G., E. N. Smirnov, T. W. Merrill, A. E. Myslenkov, H. B. Quigley, M. G. Hornocker, and B. Schleyer. 1999. Hierarchical spatial analysis of Amur tiger relationships to habitat and prey. Pages 71–99 in J. Seidensticker, S. Christie and P. Jackson, editors. Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. 1992. Capture–recapture models: using marked animals to study population dynamics. BioScience 42:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. 2005. Modern open-population capture–recapture models. Pages 88–122 in S. C. Amstrup, T. L. McDonald, and B. F. J. Manly, editors. Handbook of capture–recapture analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. and K. H. Pollock. 1990. Estimation of recruitment from immigration versus in situ reproduction using Pollock’s robust design. Ecology 71:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., J. E. Hines, J. D. Lebreton, and R. Pradel. 2000. The relative contribution of demographic components to population growth: a direct estimation approach based on reverse-time capture–recapture. Ecology 81:3362–3376

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. L. and K. H. Pollock. 1996. Nonparametric MLE under two closed capture–recapture models with heterogeneity. Biometrics 52:639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis, D. L., K. P. Burnham, G. C. White, and D. R. Anderson. 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62:1–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Pledger, S. 2000. Unified maximum likelihood estimates for closed capture–recapture models using mixtures. Biometrics 56:434–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H. 1982. A capture–recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. Journal of Wildlife Management 46:757–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H. and R. Alpizar-Jara. 2005. Classical open–population capture–recapture models. Pages 36–57 in S. C. Amstrup, T. L. McDonald and B. F. J. Manly, editors. Handbook of capture–recapture analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H., J. E. Hines, and J. D. Nichols. 1985. Goodness-of-fit tests for open capture–recapture models. Biometrics 41:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H., J. D. Nichols, C. Brownie, and J. E. Hines. 1990. Statistical inference for capture–recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107:1–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradel, R., J. E. Hines, J. D. Lebreton, and J. D. Nichols. 1997. Capture–recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53:60–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rexstad, E. and K. P. Burnham. 1991. Users’ guide for interactive program CAPTURE. Abundance estimation of closed animal populations. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, C. J. 2005. Multistate models. Pages 165–195 in S. C. Amstrup, T. L. McDonald and B. F. J. Manly, editors. Handbook of capture–recapture analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, C. J., J. F. Schweigert, and A. N. Arnason. 1993. Estimating migration-rates using tag-recovery data. Biometrics 49:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. 1965. A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J. L. D. 1993. The role of dispersal in structuring the Chitwan tiger population. Behavior 124:165–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J. L. D., C. McDougal, and M. E. Sunquist. 1987. Female land tenure system in tigers. Pages 97–109 in R. L. Tilson and U. S. Seal, editors. Tigers of the world: the biology, biopolitics, management and conservation of an endangered species. Noyes, Park Ridge, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. L. D., C. W. McDougal, S. C. Ahearn, A. Joshi, and K. Conforti. 1999. Metapopulation structure of tigers in Nepal. Pages 176–189 in J. Seidensticker, S. Christie, and P. Jackson, editors. Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. R. and K. P Burnham. 1999. A closure test for time-specific capture–recapture data. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 6:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunquist, M. E. 1981. Social organization of tigers (Panthera tigris) in Royal Chitawan National Park, Nepal. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 336:1–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. C. and K. P. Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: survival rate estimation from both live and dead encounters. Bird Study 46:120–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. C., K. P. Burnham, and D. R. Anderson. 2001. Advanced features of program MARK. Pages 368–377 in R. Field, R. J. Warren, H. Okarma, and P. R. Sievert, editors. Wildlife, land, and people: priorities for the 21st century. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., J. D. Nichols, and M. J. Conroy. 2002. Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wildlife Conservation Society – India Program, Centre for Wildlife Studies, 26-2, Aga Abbas Ali Road (Apt: 403), Bangalore, Karnataka, 560042, India

    K. Ullas Karanth

  2. U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, 20708, USA

    James D. Nichols

Authors
  1. K. Ullas Karanth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James D. Nichols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Ullas Karanth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center–Beltsville Lab, U.S. Geological Survey, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland, 20705, USA

    Allan F. O’Connell Ph.D. (Research Wildlife Biologist) (Research Wildlife Biologist)

  2. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Laurel, Maryland, 20708, USA

    James D. Nichols Ph.D. (Senior Scientist) (Senior Scientist)

  3. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Wildlife Conservation Society, 26-2, Aga Abbas Ali Road (Apt: 403), Bangalore, Karnataka, 560042, India

    K. Ullas Karanth Ph.D. (Senior Conservation Scientist) (Senior Conservation Scientist)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karanth, K.U., Nichols, J.D. (2011). Estimation of Demographic Parameters in a Tiger Population from Long-term Camera Trap Data. In: O’Connell, A.F., Nichols, J.D., Karanth, K.U. (eds) Camera Traps in Animal Ecology. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99495-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation