Skip to main content

Camera Traps in Animal Ecology and Conservation: What’s Next?

  • Chapter

Abstract

As documented in the preceding chapters, the use of camera traps in animal ­ecology has undergone an appropriate and substantive evolution. This evolution has included the general uses of camera traps and the resulting data, as well as more specific topics such as equipment and statistical inference methods. Collectively, the contributions of this volume should not be viewed as an endpoint summary, but as a milestone along this evolutionary path. The various authors have attempted to briefly summarize that evolution, to describe current methods and uses of camera trap data, and to provide some new methods that we expect to see increased use in the future. In this chapter, we use the preceding chapters to provide brief summaries of the current state of the art and science of camera trap use and then provide speculation and recommendations about changes that we anticipate and hope for in the next decade. In terms of organization, we first focus on the overall uses of camera traps and resulting data, as these uses provide the framework needed to evaluate all further methodological developments. We then ­discuss equipment and finish with a review of statistical inference methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Borchers, D. L. and M. G. Efford. 2008. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture–recapture studies. Biometrics 64:377–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P. and W. S. Overton. 1979. Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology 60:927–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A. G. and M. J. Kelly. 2007. Ocelot activity, trap success, and density in Belize: the impact of trap spacing and animal movement on density estimates. Oryx 41:469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorazio, R. M. and J. A. Royle. 2003. Mixture models for estimating the size of a closed population when capture rates vary among individuals. Biometrics 59:351–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dorazio, R. M. and J. A. Royle. 2005. Estimating size and composition of biological communities by modeling the occurrence of species. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100:389–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Efford, M. G. 2004. Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106:598–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B., J. Reppucci, M. Lucherini, and J. A. Royle. 2010. Spatially-explicit inference for open populations: estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. Ecology (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, K. 2006. Technology review. Published by MIT. (http://www.technologyreview.com/infotech/17937/). (Accessed October 2009)

  • Hamilton, M. P., E. A. Graham, P. W. Rundel, M. F. Allen, W. Kaiser, M. H. Hansen, and D. L. Estirn. 2007. New approaches in embedded networked sensing for terrestrial ecological observatories. Environmental Engineering Science 24:192–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiby, L. and P. Lovell. 1990. Computer aided matching of natural markings: a prototype system for grey seals. Reports of the International Whaling Commission, Special Issue 12:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiby, L. and P. Lovell. 2001. An automated system for matching the callosity patterns in aerial photographs of southern right whales. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management Special Issue 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiby, L., P. Lovell, N. Patil, N. S. Kumar, A. M. Gopalaswamy, and K. U. Karanth. 2009. A tiger cannot change its stripes: using a three-dimensional model to match images of living tigers and tiger skins. Biology Letters 5:383–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. 1995. Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models. Biological Conservation 71:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. and J. D. Nichols. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. and J. D. Nichols. 2000. Ecological status and conservation of tigers in India. Final Technical Report to the Division of International Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., and Wildlife Conservation Society, New York. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, India. 124 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. and J. D. Nichols, editors. 2002. Monitoring tigers and their prey. A manual for wildlife managers, researchers, and conservationists. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, India. 193 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U., J. D. Nichols, N. S. Kumar, W. A. Link, and J. E. Hines. 2004. Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:4854–4858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U., J. D. Nichols, N. S. Kumar, and J. E. Hines. 2006. Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Ecology 87:2925–2937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. J. 2001. Computer-aided photograph matching in studies employing individual identification: an example from Serengeti cheetahs. Journal of Mammalogy 82:440–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. J. 2008. Design, evaluate, refine: camera trap studies for elusive species. Animal Conservation 11:182–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukacs, P. M. and K. P. Burnham. 2005. Estimating population size from DNA-based closed capture-recapture data incorporating genotyping error. Journal of Wildlife Management 69:396–403

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, N. Sutton, K. Kawanishi, and L. L. Bailey. 2005. Suggestions for dealing with detection probability in population studies of rare species. Ecology 86:1101–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, J. A. Royle, K. H. Pollock, L. A. Bailey, and J. E. Hines. 2006. Occupancy modeling and estimation. Academic, San Diego, CA. 324 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, M. E. Seamans, and R. J. Gutierrez. 2009. Dynamic models for problems of species occurrence with multiple states. Ecology 90:823–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, R. J., J. J. Millspaugh, J. Beringer, J. Sartwell, and Z. He. 2007. A new ‘view’ of ecology and conservation through animal-borne video systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:660–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mondol, S., K. U. Karanth, N. S. Kumar, A. M. Gopalaswamy, A. Andheria, and U. Ramakrishnan. 2009. Evaluation of non-invasive genetic sampling methods for estimating tiger population size. Biological Conservation 142:2350–2360

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. and B. K. Williams. 2006. Monitoring for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:668–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., T. Boulinier, J. E. Hines, K. H. Pollock, and J. R. Sauer. 1998. Estimating rates of local extinction, colonization and turnover in animal communities. Ecological Applications 8:1213–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., J. E. Hines, D. I. MacKenzie, M. E. Seamans, and R. J. Gutierrez. 2007. Occupancy estimation with multiple states and state uncertainty. Ecology 88:1395–1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., L. L. Bailey, A. F. O’Connell, Jr., N. W. Talancy, E. H. Campbell, E. H. C. Grant, A. T. Gilbert, E. M. Annand, T. P. Husband, and J. E. Hines. 2008. Multi-scale occupancy estimation and modeling using multiple detection methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1321–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. L. and K. H. Pollock. 1996. Nonparametric MLE under two closed capture–recapture models with heterogeneity. Biometrics 52:639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, A. F. Jr., N. W. Talancy, L. L. Bailey, J. R. Sauer, R. Cook, and A. T. Gilbert. 2006. Estimating site occupancy and detection probability parameters for meso- and large mammals in a coastal ecosystem. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:1625–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pledger, S. 2000. Unified maximum likelihood estimates for closed capture–recapture models using mixtures. Biometrics 56:434–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J. A. and R. M. Dorazio. 2008. Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology: the analysis of data from populations and communities. Academic, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J. A. and J. D. Nichols. 2003. Estimating abundance from repeated presence absence data or point counts. Ecology 84:777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J. A. and K. Young. 2008. A hierarchical model for spatial capture–recapture data. Ecology 89:2281–2289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J. A., J. D. Nichols, K. U. Karanth, and A. M. Gopalaswamy. 2009a. A hierarchical model for estimating density in camera trap studies. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J. A., K. U. Karanth, A. M. Gopalaswamy, and N. S. Kumar. 2009b. Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture–recapture models. Ecology 90:3233–3244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmento, P., J. Cruz, C. Eira, and C. Fonseca. 2009. Evaluation of camera trapping for estimating red fox abundance. Journal of Wildlife Management 73:1207–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P., A. M. Gopalaswamy, J. A. Royle, N. S. Kumar, and K. U. Karanth. 2010. SPACECAP: a program to estimate animal abundance and density using Bayesian spatially-explicit capture-recapture models. Wildlife Conservation Society-India Program, Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, India. Version 1.0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soisalo, M. K. and S. M. C. Cavalcanti. 2006 Estimating the density of a jaguar population in the Brazilian Pantanal using camera-traps and capture–recapture sampling in combination with GPS radio-telemetry. Biological Conservation 129:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, M., E. Graham, M. Hamilton, S. Ahmadian, M. Rahimi, J. Sharon, C. Hicks, and J. King. 2007. Deployment of wireless, networked camera systems and sensors for observation of avian and reptile behavior. Page 19 in R. W. Kays and M. Wikelski, editors. Review of National Science Foundation sponsored animal tracking and physiological monitoring workshop. Report published online at http://www.movebank.org/assets/ATPM_whitepaper.pdf

  • Takahashi, A., K. Sato, Y. Naito, M. J. Dunn, P. N. Trathan, and J. P. Croxall. 2004. Penguin-mounted cameras glimpse underwater group behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences 271:S281–S282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, A., N. Kokubun, Y. Mori, and H. Shin. 2008. Krill-feeding behaviour of gentoo penguins as shown by animal-borne camera loggers. Polar Biology 31:1291–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanuki, Y., F. Daunt, A. Takahashi, M. Newell, S. Wanless, K. Sato, and N. Miyazaki. 2008. Microhabitat use and prey capture of a bottom-feeding top predator, the European shag, shown by camera loggers. Marine Ecology Progress Series 356:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., J. D. Nichols, and M. J. Conroy. 2002. Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic, San Diego. 817 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz, N. G., J. D. Nichols, and T. Boulinier. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:446–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshizaki, J., K. H. Pollock, C. Brownie, and R. A. Webster. 2009. Modeling misidentification errors in capture–recapture studies using photographic identification of evolving marks. Ecology 90:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James D. Nichols .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nichols, J.D., O’Connell, A.F., Karanth, K.U. (2011). Camera Traps in Animal Ecology and Conservation: What’s Next?. In: O’Connell, A.F., Nichols, J.D., Karanth, K.U. (eds) Camera Traps in Animal Ecology. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99495-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics