Skip to main content

Pythagorean mathematical idealism and the framing of economic and political theory

  • Chapter
Advances in Mathematical Economics

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematical Economics ((MATHECON,volume 13))

  • 652 Accesses

Abstract

The Greek culture evolved in the shadow of two dominant and sophisticated economies: the Chaldeans (Babylonians), with their strong arithmetical and administrative culture and the Egyptians, who contributed a geometric orientation. In the shadow of these two traditions, the Pythagoreans and Plato assimilated a mystic perspective of an ideal world of mathematics. Later Greeks developed a system of fair division that absorbed an arithmetic dyad. Aristotle analyzed two-party isolated exchange using the harmonic proportion introduced by the Pythagoreans whose “ideal types” influenced later market perspectives. These traditions informed modern regulated political, legal and economic institutions.

Received: September 24, 2009

Revised: October 30, 2009

JEL classification: B00, C00, N00

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 00-02, 01A05, 11-00

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It has been surmised that Pythagoras’ exposure to the existence of regular crystalline forms used by his father in his jewelry trade informed the development of Pythagoras’ concept that the universe is composed of regular solids.

  2. 2.

    Plato’s emulation of Pythagoras’ secrecy is reflected in the absence of any discussion of irrational numbers in his writings. This secrecy regarding irrational numbers was also perpetuated by Euclid and was apparently also characteristic of Nicomachus, who wrote an extended book on arithmetic at the beginning of the second century AD, much of which is lost. Iamblichus wrote a book on Pythagoreanism dating from the late third or early fourth century AD, but the chapters on arithmetic, apparently drawn from Nicomachus, have also been lost. We have to go to Boethius’ writing in the late fifth and early sixth century AD, for a record of Nicomachus’ work, but Boethius’ commentary does not elaborate the problem of irrational numbers.

  3. 3.

    An exhaustive analysis of the uncanny number of correlations implicit in this ratio can be found in Le nombre d’or by Ghyka [6].

  4. 4.

    The basic problem is that Aristotle’s text on exchange is rather sketchy and has probably suffered from centuries of re-copying and translation, frequently done by people who did not clearly understand the subject matter.

References

  1. Aeschylus (n.d.) Eumenides

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brams, S.J., Taylor, A.D.: Fair division: from cake-cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1996

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandon, S.G.F.: The weighing of the soul. In: Kitagawa J.M., Long C.H. (eds.): Myths and symbols. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1969

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, J.M., et al.: Plato complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett 1997

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donne, J.: First anniversary 11.278. Quoted in: Nicholson M.H. (1962) The breaking of the circle, rev. edn. New York: Columbia University Press 1972

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghyka, M.C.: Le nombre d’or. Paris: Editions du la Librairie Gallimard 1931

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hanson, V.D.: The other Greeks. New York: The Free Press 1995

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krader, L.: The Asiatic mode of production: sources, development and critique in the writings of Karl Marx. Assen: Van Gorcum 1975

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lowry, S.T.: The classical Greek theory of natural resource economics. Land. Econ. 41, 204–208 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowry, S.T.: The archaeology of the circulation concept in economic theory. J. Hist. Ideas 35(3), 429–444 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowry, S.T.: The archaeology of economic ideas. Durham: Duke University Press 1987

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lowry, S.T.: Distributive economics and the Promethean meat division: myth, folktale and legal precedent. In: Silver M. (ed.): Ancient economy in mythology: east and west. Savage, MD: Roman & Littlefield, 1991 pp. 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masi, M.: Boethian number theory: a translation of the De Institutione Arithmetica. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi 1983

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neugebauer, O.: The exact sciences in antiquity, 2nd edn. New York: Dover 1969

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nissen, H.J., Damereow, P., Englund, R.K.: Archaic bookkeeping: early writing and techniques of economic administration in the ancient near east. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1994

    Google Scholar 

  16. O’Meara, D.J.: Pythagoras revived. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1989

    Google Scholar 

  17. Plescia, J.: The oath and perjury in ancient Greece. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida 1970

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pringsheim, F.: The Greek law of sale. Weimar: Böhlau 1950

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson, D.W.: “Excess and defects” in Science and the classics. London: Oxford University Press 1940

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Todd Lowry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lowry, S.T. (2010). Pythagorean mathematical idealism and the framing of economic and political theory. In: Kusuoka, S., Maruyama, T. (eds) Advances in Mathematical Economics. Advances in Mathematical Economics, vol 13. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99490-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics