Megacities pp 273-287 | Cite as

Los Angeles: Urban Development in the Postsuburban Megacity

Part of the Library for Sustainable Urban Regeneration book series (LSUR, volume 10)


Los Angeles, a dynamic megacity of booms and busts, is on the cusp of an era of a significant transformation. Dubbed the birthplace of sprawl, it is slowly reinventing itself as a postsuburban metropolis. This sea change is sparked by both top-down and bottom-up strategies, and while large-scale plans have been important forces for change, tactical incremental changes have been even more significant.


Real Estate Public Transit Urban Form Smart Growth Residential Real Estate 


  1. Banham R (1971) Los Angeles: the architecture of four ecologies. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. California High-Speed Rail Authority (2009) Website. (accessed March 29, 2009)
  3. Chase J, Crawford M, Kalisky J (eds) (1999) Everyday urbanism. Monacelli, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuff D (2000) The provisional city: Los Angeles stories of American architecture and urbanism. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Dear M, Flusty S (2002) Los Angeles as postmodern urbanism. In: Dear M (ed) From Chicago to L.A.: making sense of urban theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 55–84Google Scholar
  6. DiMassa C (2008) New downtown has shaky pillars. Los Angeles Times, Section 1: 1, p 11Google Scholar
  7. Fogelson RM (1967) The fragmented metropolis: Los Angeles, 1850–1930. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  8. Fulton B (2008) SB 375 is now law – but what will it do? California planning and development report.
  9. Hayden D (2003) Building suburbia. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Hise G (1997) Magnetic Los Angeles. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  11. Howlett D, Overberg P (2004) Think your commute is tough? USA today.
  12. Kling R, Olin S, Poster M (eds) (1991) Postsuburban California: the transformation of postwar Orange County, California. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  13. Koolhaas R (2004) Content. Taschen, CologneGoogle Scholar
  14. Los Angeles Conservancy (2002) Housing conversion in downtown Los Angeles.
  15. Lucy WH, Phillips DL (1997) The post-suburban era comes to Richmond: city decline, suburban transition, and exurban growth. Landsc Urban Plann 36(4):259–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. The Planning Report (2007) SB 375 connects land use and AB 32 implementation. Scholar
  17. Shoup D (2005) The high cost of free parking. APA Planners Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Southern California Association of Governments (2007) Regional pocket guide.
  19. State of California (2009) Official California legislation information.
  20. Texas Transportation Institute (2009) 2007 Urban mobility report. Urban mobility information, Texas A&M University. (accessed February 3, 2009)
  21. US Census Bureau (2007) More than 300 counties now “majority–minority.”
  22. Zahniser D (2008) L.A. stops 5,553-unit home plan. Los Angeles Times, Front Section: 1, p 14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.cityLABBostonUSA
  2. 2.UCLA Department of Architecture and Urban DesignLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations