Advertisement

Mobilizing Communities to Regenerate Deprived Urban Neighborhoods in Glasgow

  • Naofumi Suzuki
Part of the cSUR-UT Series: Library for Sustainable Urban Regeneration book series (LSUR, volume 6)

Since the late 1990s, British urban policy has been characterized by its understanding of the concentration of multiple disadvantages in inner and peripheral urban neighborhoods as “social exclusion”, which are to be tackled by means of strategic partnerships between public, private and community sectors (Social Exclusion Unit 1998, 2001). Within these partnerships, it has been expected that local communities would play a leading role in initiating and managing urban regeneration projects, although such community-led projects have not necessarily been altogether successful in sustaining themselves. Drawing on the case study of a sport-based social regeneration project targeted at young people, this chapter considers the way in which a community-led, locally-based, small-scale urban regeneration project might be able to sustain and develop itself within the wider framework of urban regeneration policy.

This chapter consists of two main parts. The first provides an overview of the chronological development and recent tendencies of British urban regeneration policy, with a particular focus on the difference between English and Scottish approaches. In doing so, it will set up a backdrop to the case study through a review of the issues around the relationships between the recent urban regeneration partnership schemes and communities.

Keywords

Young People Urban Regeneration Social Inclusion Urban Policy Community Safety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, R. and Helms, G. (Eds.) (2007) Securing an Urban Renaissance: Crime, Community and British Urban Policy. Bristol, The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boyle, R. (1989) Partnership in Practice — An Assessment of Public—Private Collaboration in Urban Regeneration — A Case Study of Glasgow Action. Local Government Studies, 15, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coalter, F. (2007) A Wider Social Role for Sport: Who's Keeping the Score? London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Coalter, F., Allison, M., and Taylor, J. (2000) The Role of Sport in Regenerating Deprived Areas. Edinburgh, Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.Google Scholar
  5. Communities Scotland and Scottish Executive (2003) Integrating Social Inclusion Partnerships and Community Planning Partnerships. Edinburgh, Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  6. Crabbe, T. (2005) ‘Getting to Know You’: Engagement and Relationship Building: First Interim National Positive Futures Case Study Research Report. London, Home Office.Google Scholar
  7. Crabbe, T. (2006a) ‘Going the Distance’: Impact, Journeys and Distance Travelled: Third Interim National Positive Futures Case Study Research Report. London, Home Office.Google Scholar
  8. Crabbe, T. (2006b) ‘In the Boot Room’: Organisational Contexts and Partnerships: Second Interim National Positive Futures Case Study Research Report. London, Home Office.Google Scholar
  9. Crabbe, T., Bailey, G., Blackshaw, T., Brown, A., Choak, C., Gidley, B., Mellor, G., O'connor, K., Slater, I., and Woodhouse, D. (2006) Knowing the Score: Positive Futures Case Study Research: Final Report. London, Home Office.Google Scholar
  10. Donnison, D. and Middleton, A. (Eds.) (1987) Regenerating the Inner City: Glasgow's Experience. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Furlong, A. and Cartmel, F. (1997) Young People and Social Change: Individualization and Risk in Late Modernity. Buckingham, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Furlong, A., Cartmel, F., Biggart, A., Sweeting, H., and West, P. (2003) Youth Transitions: Patterns of Vulnerability and Processes of Social Inclusion. Edinburgh, Scottish Executive Social Research.Google Scholar
  13. Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Houlihan, B. and White, A. (2002) The Politics of Sports Development: Development of Sport or Development Through Sport? London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kearns, A. and Turok, I. (2000) Power, Responsibility, and Governance in Britain's New Urban Policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keating, M. (1988) The City that Refused to Die: Glasgow: The Politics of Urban Regeneration. Aberdeen, Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kintrea, K. and Suzuki, N. (2008) Too Much Cohesion? Young People's Territoriality in Glasgow and Edinburgh. In: Flint, J. and Robinsion, D. (Eds.) Community Cohesion in Crisis? Bristol, The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lloyd, G., McCarthy, J., and Fernie, K. (2001) From Cause to Effect?: A New Agenda for Urban Regeneration in Scotland. Local Economy, 16, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lupton, R. (2003) Poverty Street: The Dynamics of Neighbourhood Decline and Renewal. Bristol, The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  20. McCarthy, J. (2007) Partnership, Collaborative Planning and Urban Regeneration. Hampshire, Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. McWilliams, C. (2004) Including the Community in Local Regeneration?: The Case of Greater Pollok Social Inclusion Partnership. Local Economy, 19, 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McWilliams, C., Johnstone, C., and Mooney, G. (2004) Urban Policy in the New Scotland: The Role of Social Inclusion Partnerships. Space and Polity, 8, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nichols, G. (2007) Sport and Crime Reduction: The Role of Sports in Tackling Youth Crime. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Scottish Executive (2006) Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006. Edinburgh, Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  25. Social Exclusion Unit (1998) Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal. London, Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  26. Social Exclusion Unit (2000a) National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal: Report of Policy Action Team 8: Anti-Social Behavior. London, Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  27. Social Exclusion Unit (2000b) National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal: Report of Policy Action Team 12: Young People. London, Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  28. Social Exclusion Unit (2001) A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal: National Strategy Action Plan. London, HMSO.Google Scholar
  29. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Suzuki, N. (2008) Git Oot o' Ma Patch! Breaking Down Territorial Barriers to Help Young People's Social Inclusion. Learning Cities in a Knowledge Based Society: Book of Abstract + CD of Papers, XI EURA Conference, 9–11 October, Milan.Google Scholar
  31. Suzuki, N. and Kintrea, K. (2007) Young People and Territoriality in Scotland: An Exploratory Study: Final Report to the Scottish Executive. Glasgow, Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  32. Taylor, P., Crow, I., Irvine, D. and Nichols, G. (1999) Demanding Physical Activity Programmes for Young Offenders under Probation Supervision, London, Home Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naofumi Suzuki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringThe University of TokyoBunkyo-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations