Advertisement

The Characteristics of the Cultural Landscape in Malaysia: Concept and Perspective

  • Saiful Arif Abdullah
Part of the Ecological Research Monographs book series (ECOLOGICAL)

Abstract

Long-term human–nature interaction in rural areas creates special features with unique spatial ecological functions. These areas are called cultural landscapes, or are occasionally known as rural landscapes. Around the world, cultural landscapes have long been impacted by socio-economic development. The effects include loss of biodiversity, changes in the ecosystem and ecological processes, a pattern of resource use by local people, and an aesthetic value. In countries in the European and North American continents, as well as the Far East of Asian regions, and particularly Japan and Korea, the characteristics of cultural landscapes and their response to socio-economic development have been identified and assessed. However, this process has received less attention in countries of the Southeast Asian region, for example, Malaysia. Therefore, the objective of this chapter is to develop the concept and perspective of a cultural landscape in Malaysia, and to define it in the context of the country. A case study – the Merbok estuary – is presented as an example to describe the characteristics of cultural landscapes in Malaysia.

Keywords

Paddy Field Forest Resource Cultural Landscape Vegetable Farm Southeast Asian Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is part of a research project entitled “Landscape fragmentation and heterogeneity of mangrove landscape in peninsular Malaysia” funded by Research University Grant UKM-GUP-ASPL-08-06-212, courtesy of the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia.

References

  1. Antrop M (1997) The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning. The example of Flanders Region. Landsc Urban Plan 38:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austad I (1988) Tree pollarding in Western Norway. In: Birks HH, Birks HJB, Kaland PE, Moe D (eds) The cultural landscape: past, present and future. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckley R, Ollenburg C, Zhong L (2008) Cultural landscape in Mongolian tourism. Ann Tour Res 35:47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farina A (2000) The cultural landscape as a model for the integration of ecology and economics. Bioscience 50:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Gomez-Limon J, de Lucio Fernandez JV (1999) Changes in use and landscape preferences on the agricultural-livestock landscapes of the central Iberian Peninsula (Madrid, Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 44:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hong SK (1998) Changes in landscape patterns and vegetation process in the far-Eastern cultural landscape: human activity on pine-dominated secondary vegetation in Korea and Japan. Phytocoenologia 28:45–66Google Scholar
  8. Hong SK (2001) Factors affecting landscape changes in central Korea: cultural disturbance of the forested landscape system. In: Van der Zee D, Zonneveld IS (eds) Landscape ecology applied in land evaluation, development and conservation: some worldwide selected examples. ITC, Netherlands, pp 131–147Google Scholar
  9. Hong SK, Nakagoshi N, Kamada M (1995) Human impacts on pine-dominated vegetation in rural landscapes in Korea and western Japan. Vegetation 116:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jomo KS, Chang YT, Khoo KJ (2004) Deforesting Malaysia. The political economy and social ecology of agricultural expansion and commercial logging. Zed Books, New York, 253 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Kamada M, Nakagoshi N (1996) Landscape structure and the disturbance regime at three rural regions in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. Landsc Ecol 11:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khoo TT (1996) Geomorphological evolution of the Merbok estuary area and its impact on the early state of Kedah, northwest peninsular Malaysia. J Southeast Asian Earth Sci 13:347–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim JE, Hong SK, Nakagoshi N (2007) International trends of rural landscape researches for land management and policies. In: Hong SK, Nakagoshi N, Morimoto Y (eds) Landscape ecological applications in man-influenced areas: linking man and nature systems. Springer, the Netherlands, pp 489–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitazawa T, Ohsawa M (2002) Patterns of species diversity in rural herbaceous communities under different management regimes, Chiba, central Japan. Biol Conserv 104:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim JNW, Douglas I (2000) Land management policy and practice in a steep land agricultural area: a Malaysian example. Land Degrad Dev 11:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mander Ü, Pallang H, Ihse M (2004) Development of European landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 67:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakagoshi N, Hong SK (2001) Vegetation and landscape ecology of East Asian ‘SATOYAMA’. Global Environ Res 5:171–181Google Scholar
  18. Nassauer JI (1995) Culture and changing landscape structure. Landsc Ecol 10:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naveh Z (1995) Interactions of landscapes and cultures. Landsc Urban Plan 32:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ong JE (2003) Plants of the Merbok Mangrove, Kedah, Malaysia and the urgent need for their conservation. Folia Malaysiana 4:1–18Google Scholar
  21. Ong JE, Gong WK, Wong CH, Din ZHj (1991) Characterization of a Malaysian mangrove estuary. Estuaries 14:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oreszczyn S (2000) A systems approach to the research of people’s relationships with English hedgerows. Landsc Urban Plan 50:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oreszczyn S, Lane A (2000) The meaning of hedgerows in the English landscape: different stakeholder perspectives and the implications for future hedge management. J Environ Manage 60:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pinto-Correia T (2000) Future development in Portuguese rural areas: how to manage agricultural support for landscape conservation? Landsc Urban Plan 50:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Plieninger T, Höchtl E, Spek T (2006) Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes. Environ Sci Policy 9:317–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabbinge R, van Diepen CA (2000) Changes in agriculture and land use in Europe. Eur J Agro 13:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soo SW (1976) Semi-detailed soil survey of the Sungei Merbok area, Kedah. Division of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Soil Survey Report 8Google Scholar
  28. Takeuchi K (2001) Nature conservation strategies for the ‘SATOYAMA’ and ‘SATOCHI’, habitats for secondary nature in Japan. Global Environ Res 5:193–198Google Scholar
  29. UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2003) Cultural landscape: the challenges of conservation. World Heritage papers 7. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Ferrara, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  30. Vos W, Meekes H (1999) Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc Urban Plan 46:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zonneveld IS (1995) Land ecology. SPB Academic Publisher, The HagueGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI)Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations