Abstract
The commonly respected set of human rights includes the right for food and water, which are direct consequences of the biological design of our species. However, as we argue, this list of inherent rights is not complete, as illustrated by the analysis of ecological space scaling and social group size in other mammalian species. The size of individually controlled territory (home range), which scales proportionally to body mass, is estimated to be of the order of 4 km2 per individual in a mammalian species equal in size to Homo sapiens. The urbanized landscapes of modern civilization, with concentrated living at high population densities, violate this inherent ecological demand of the species. The behavioral, biological, ecological, and social causes and consequences of this violation are discussed. It is argued that coping with the global ecological and environmental challenges will be impossible without focused scientific studies of the genetically encoded ecological requirements of our species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams ES (2001) Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:277–303
Baker PR (1983) Insect territoriality. Annu Rev Entomol 28:65–89
Carlstead K, Fraser J, Bennett C et al (1999) Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in U.S. Zoos: II. Behavior, breeding success, and mortality in relation to housing facilities. Zoo Biol 18:35–52
Fokin IM (1978) The Dipodoidae. Leningrad University Press, Leningrad
Gorshkov VG (1995) Physical and biological bases of life stability: man, biota, environment. Springer, Berlin
Gorshkov VG, Makar’eva AM (2001) On the possibility of physical self-organization of biological and ecological systems. Dokl Biol Sci 378:258–261
Gorshkov VG, Gorshkov VV, Makarieva AM (2000) Biotic regulation of the environment: key issue of global change. Springer-Praxis, London
Hayden B (1981) Subsistence and ecological adaptations of modem hunter/gatherers. In: Harding RSO, Teleki G (eds) Omnivorous primates: gathering and hunting in human evolution. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 344–421
Kelt DA, Van Vuren DH (2001) The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. Am Nat 157:637–645
Lutz W, Qiang R (2002) Determinants of human population growth. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:1197–1210
Lutz W, Testa MR, Penn DJ (2006) Population density is a key factor in declining human fertility. Popul Environ 28:69–81
Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li B-L (2004) Body size, energy consumption and allometric scaling: a new dimension in the diversity-stability debate. Ecol Complex 1:139–175
Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li B-L (2005a) Energetics of the smallest: do bacteria breathe at the same rate as whales? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:2219–2224
Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li B-L (2005b) Why do population density and inverse home range scale differently with body size? Implications for ecosystem stability. Ecol Complex 2:259–271
Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li B-L et al (2008) Mean mass-specific metabolic rates are strikingly similar across life’s major domains: evidence for life’s metabolic optimum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16994–16999
Mitani JC, Rodman PS (1979) Territoriality: the relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:241–251
Mitchell J (1989) The “greenhouse” effect and climate change. Rev Geophys 27:115–139
Rappaport RA (1971) The flow of energy in an agricultural society. Sci Am 225:117–132
Sibly RM, Hone J (2003) Population growth rate and its determinants: an overview. In: Sibly RM, Hone J, Clutton-Brock TH (eds) Wildlife population growth rates. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 11–40
Stanley SM (1979) Macroevolution: pattern and process. Freeman, San Francisco
Whittaker RH, Likens GE (1975) The biosphere and man. In: Lieth H, Whittaker RH (eds) Primary productivity of the biosphere. Springer, Berlin, pp 305–328
Winterhalder B, Baillargeon W, Cappelletto F et al (1988) The population ecology of hunter-gatherers and their prey. J Anthropol Archaeol 7:289–328
Acknowledgments
BLL thanks the US National Science Foundation and UC Agricultural Experiment Station for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Makarieva, A.M., Gorshkov, V.G., Li, BL. (2011). Have Ecological Human Rights Been Globally Lost? A Conflict of Ecological Spatial Requirements and Cultural Landscape Opportunities in Modern Homo sapiens . In: Hong, SK., Kim, JE., Wu, J., Nakagoshi, N. (eds) Landscape Ecology in Asian Cultures. Ecological Research Monographs. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-87799-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-87799-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-87798-1
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-87799-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)