Animal Movement Data: GPS Telemetry, Autocorrelation and the Need for Path-Level Analysis


In the previous chapter we presented the idea of a multi-layer, multi-scale, spatially referenced data-cube as the foundation for monitoring and for implementing flexible modeling of ecological pattern—process relationships in particulate, in context and to integrate these across large spatial extents at the grain of the strongest linkage between response and driving variables. This approach is powerful for developing information about the conditions of multiple ecological attributes continuously across the analysis area. However, there are a number of ecological questions that involve processes that are not functions of ecological conditions at point locations alone. Many of these involve spatial processes and mobile agents, such as the spread of disturbances, dispersal of propagules, and the movement of mobile animals. The focus of this chapter is on animal movement data.


Home Range Movement Path Distance Class Path Variety Path Type 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aebisher NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RE (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radiotracking data. Ecology 74:1313–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allderedge JR, Ratti JT (1986) Comparison of some statistical techniques for analysis of resource selection. J Wildl Manag 50:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cresswell WJ, Smith GC (1992) The effects of temporally autocorrelated data on methods of home range analysis. In: Priede IG, Swift SM (eds) Wildlife telemetry: remote monitoring and tracking of animals. Ellis Horwood, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Cushman SA, Chase M, Griffin C (2005) Elephants in space and time. Oikos 109:331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fortin M-J, Dale M (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecolgists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Harris RB, Fancy SG, Douglas DC, et al. (1990) Tracking wildlife by satellite: current systems and performance. Tech Rep 30 US Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
  7. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or a new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Legendre P, Fortin M-J (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modelling, 20. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Litvaitis JA, Sherburne JA, Bissonette JA (1986) Bobcat habitat use and home range size in relation to prey density. J Wildl Manag 50:110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Litvaitis JA, Titus K, Anderson EM (1994) Measuring vertebrate use of terrestrial habitats and foods. Invited contribution. In: T. Bookhout (Ed.) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. The Wildlife Society, Washington, DC, pp. 254–274Google Scholar
  12. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized linear regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Neu CW, Byers CR, Peek JM (1974) A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J Wildl Manag 38:541–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oden NL, Sokal RR (1986) Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. Syst Zool 35:526–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Otis DL, White GC (1999) Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radio tracking data. J Wildl Manag 63:1039–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Palomares F, Delibes M (1992) Data analysis and potential bias in radio-tracking studies of animal habitat use. Acta Oecol 13:221–226Google Scholar
  17. Rooney S, Wolfe MA, Kayden TJ (1998) Autocorrelated data in telemetry studies: time to independence and the problem of behavioral effects. Mammal Rev 28:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schoener TW (1981) An empirically based estimate of home range. Theor Popul Biol 20:281–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sokal RR (1986) Spatial data analysis and historical processes. In: Daly E, et al. (eds) Data analysis and informatics, I V. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. Springer JT (1979) Some sources of bias and sampling error in radio triangulation. J Wildl Manag 43:926–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Swihart RK, Slade NA, (1985) Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home-range size. J Wildl Manag 49:1019–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Swihart RK, Slade NA (1997) On testing for independence of animal movements. J Agric Biol Environ Statist 2:48–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomas DL, Taylor EJ (1990) Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. J Wildl Manag 54:322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations