Free Database Availability, Metadata and the Internet: An Example of Two High Latitude Components of the Census of Marine Life

  • Bodil Bluhm
  • David Watts
  • Falk Huettmann


Our understanding of science is based on data. For hundreds of years, natural scientists have collected observations and compiled measurements. Historically, the data have been recorded and archived in notebooks, typed reports and more recently in electronic format. Most projects had a small and somewhat opportunistic scope, and lacked a wider international coordination and strategy; this is specifically the case for databases and their dissemination. Only in the last decades has the culture of data sharing and open access databases developed, and the focus changed to international collaborations and questions of global relevance (Esanu and Uhlir 2004; Huettmann 2005; see Graham et al. 2004 for Natural History Collections). In times of globalization, such an approach is urgently required. In the field of biodiversity, the need for open access databases has grown tremendously in the last decades because of the growth of humankind to the extent where man directly explores resources within and beyond their sustainability and directly and indirectly affects biota to extinction (Wilson 1999). Inventories represent the essence for sustainable management, for assessing and understanding changes and to inform educated decision-making (Braun 2005).


Southern Ocean Marine Life Global Biodiversity Information Facility International Polar Year Open Access Database 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bluhm BA, Gradinger R, Hüttmann F, Hopcroft RR, Gebruk A, Sirenko BI (2008) Arctic Ocean Diversity — A Census of Marine Life project in the Arctic. BIUZ (in German) 38:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun CE (2005) Techniques for Wildlife Investigations and Management. The Wildlife Society (TWS), Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodeur RD, Sugisaki H, Hunt GL Jr (2002) Increases in jellyfish in the Bering Sea: implications for the ecosystem. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 233:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CAML (2005) The Census of Antarctic Marine Life (CAML).
  5. Clarke A (1998) Temperature and energetics: an introduction to cold ocean physiology. In: Pörtner H-O, Playle RC (eds.) Cold ocean physiology. Soc. Exp. Biol. Seminar Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–30Google Scholar
  6. Comiso JC, Parkinson CL, Gersten R, Stock L (2008) Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophys Res Lett 35: L01703, doi:01710.01029/02007GL031972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costanza R, Andrade F, Antunes P, van den Belt M, Boersma D, Boesch DF, Catarino F, Hanna S, Limburg K, Low B, Molitor M, Pereira JG, Rayner S, Santos R, Wilson J, Young M (1998) Principles for sustainable governance of the oceans. Science 281:198–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Costello, M.J. and E. Vanden Berghe (2006) Ocean Biodiversity Informatics: enabling a new era in marine biology research and management. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 316:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deprez T, Vanden Berghe E, Vincx M (2004) NeMys: a multidisciplinary biological information system. In: Vanden Berghe E, Brown M, Costello MJ, Heip C, Pissierssens P (eds), Proceedings of ‘The Colour of Ocean Data’ Symposium, Brussels 25–27 November 2002, IOC Workshop Report 188 (UNESCO), Paris), [and VLIZ Special Publication 16], pp. 57–63Google Scholar
  10. Edwards JL, Lane MA, Nielsen ES (2000) Interoperability of biodiversity databases: biodiversity information on every desktop. Science 289:2312–2314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Esanu JM, Uhlir PF (eds.) (2004) Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science: Proceedings of an International Symposium. U.S. National Committee for CODATA, National Research Council.Google Scholar
  12. Finney KT (2008) Australian Antarctic Program (AAP) Data Policy. Accessed at
  13. Froese R, Pauly D (eds) (2000) FishBase 2000: concepts, design and data sources. ICLARM Contribution, 1594. ICLARM: Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. XVII, 344 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Gagaev SY (2008) Sigambra healyae sp. n., a new species of polychaete (Polychaeta: Pilargidae) from the Canadian Basin of the Arctic Ocean. Russian J Mar Biol 34:73–75Google Scholar
  15. Gradinger R, Bluhm B (2005) Arctic Ocean Exploration 2002. Polar Biol (Special Issue) 28:169–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham CH, Ferrier S, Huettmann F, Moritz C, Peterson AT (2004). New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 19:497–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Grebmeier JM, Overland JE, Moore SE, Farley EV, Carmack EC, Cooper LW, Frey KE, Helle JH, McLaughlin FA, McNutt SL (2006) A major ecosystem shift in the northern Bering Sea. Science 311:1461–1464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamre J (1994) Biodiversity and exploitation of the main fish stocks in the Norwegian — Barents Sea ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 3:473–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hickel W, Mangelsdort P, Berg J (1993) The human impact in the German Bight: Eutrophication during three decades (1962–1991) ) Helgoland Mar Res 47:243–263Google Scholar
  20. Hosie G (2005) Southern Ocean CPR Survey. Sir Alistair Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science, Annual Report 2004, pp. 16–17Google Scholar
  21. Huettmann F (2005) Databases and science-based management in the context of wildlife and habitat: towards a certified ISO standard for objective decision-making for the global community by using the internet. J Wildlife Manage 69:466–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunt GL, Stabeno PJ (2002) Climate change and the control of energy flow in the southeastern Bering Sea. Prog Oceanogr 55:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manabe S, Stouffer RJ (1995) Simulation of abrupt climate change induced by freshwater input into the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature 378:165–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) (2000) Invasive species in a changing world. Island, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Nic Donnacha E, Guiry MD (2002) AlgaeBase: documenting seaweed biodiversity in Ireland and the world. Biol Envir Proc R Ir Acad 102B:185–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. O'Dor R, Gallardo VA (2005) How to census marine life: ocean realm field projects. Sci Mar 69:181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pauly D, Christensen V, Dalsgaard J, Froese R, Torres F Jr (1998) Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279:860–863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pauly D, Alder J, Bennett E, Christensen V, Tyedmers P, Watson R (2003) The future for fisheries. Science 302:1359–1361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Piraino S, Bluhm BA, Gradinger R, Boero F (2008) Sympagohydra tuuli gen. nov. et sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) a cool hydroid from the Arctic sea ice. J Mar Biol Ass UK 88:1637–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pörtner H-O, Playle RC (eds.) (1998) Cold ocean physiology. Soc Exp Biol Seminar Series. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Rintoul, S (2008) Antarctic route highlights new ocean-climate links — the SURVOSTRAL project, CSIRO Media release 08/24.
  32. Rogacheva AV (2007) Revision of the Arctic group of species of the family Elpidiidae (Elasipodida, Holothuroidea). Mar Biol Res 3:367–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rutzen I (2008) Predictive GIS-modelling of arctic mesozooplankton distribution based on available online data for four copepod species (Calanus glacialis, Calanus hyperboreus, Metridia longa and Metridia pacifica). Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, University of Hannover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  34. Schumacher J D, Bond NA, Brodeur RD, Livingston PA, Napp JM, Stabeno PJ (2003) Climate change in the southeastern Bering Sea and some consequences for biota. In: Hempel G, Sherman K (eds.) Large marine ecosystems of the world. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 17–40Google Scholar
  35. Serreze MC, Holland MM, Stroeve J (2007) Perspectives on the Arctic's shrinking sea-ice cover. Science 315:1533–1536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Shimada K, McLaughlin F, Carmack E, Proshutinsky A, Nishino S, Itoh M (2004) Penetration of the 1990s warm temperature anomaly of Atlantic Water in the Canada Basin. Geophys Res Lett: 31 L20301, doi:10.1029/2004GL020860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stroeve JC, Holland MM, Meier W, Scambos T, Serreze M (2007) Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast. Geophysl Res Lett 34, L09501, DOI 10.1029/2007GL029703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SMEBD (2008). World Register of Marine Species. Accessed at on
  39. Stiglitz J (2006). Making Globalization work: The next steps to global justice. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Strong M (2001). Where on Earth are we going? Texere, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. TDWG (2007) Taxanomic Database Working Group Darwin Core wiki site.
  42. Thiel H, Pörtner HO, Arntz WE (1996) Marine life at low temperatures — a comparison of polar and deep-sea characteristics. In: Uiblein F, Ott J, Stachowitsch M (eds.) Deep-sea and extreme shallow-water habitats: affinities and adaptations. Biosystematics and Ecology Series 11:183–219Google Scholar
  43. Thomson PG, Davidson AT, Cadman N (2008) Temporal changes in effects of ambient UV radiation on natural communities of Antarctic marine protists. Aquat Microb Ecol 52:131–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson, EO (1999) The Living Planet in Crisis. 1st edn. Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Woehler EJ, Raymond B, Watts DJ (2003) Decadal-scale seabird assemblages in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 251:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Woehler EJ, Raymond B, Watts DJ (2006) Convergence or divergence: where do short-tailed shearwaters forage in the Southern Ocean? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 324:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wood JW, Day CL, Lee P, O'Dor RK (2000) CephBase: testing ideas for cephalopod and other species-level databases. Oceanography 13:14–20.Google Scholar
  48. Worm B, Sandow M, Oschlies A, Lotze HK, Myers RA (2005) Global patterns of predator diversity in the open oceans. Science 309:1365–1369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Worm B, Lotze HK, Myers RA (2006) Ecosystem effects of fishing and whaling in the North Pacific and Atlantic Ocean. In: Estes JA, Brownell RL, DeMaster DP, Doak DF, Williams TM (eds) Whales, whaling and ocean ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkley, CA, pp. 333–341Google Scholar
  50. Yarincik K, O'Dor R (2005) The Census of Marine Life: goals, scope and strategy. Sci Mar 69 (suppl 1) 2005:201–208Google Scholar
  51. Zhang Y, Grassle JF (2003) A portal for the Ocean Biogeographic Information System. Oceanol Acta 25:193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Fisheries and Ocean SciencesUniversity of Alaska-FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Australian Antarctic DivisionAustralian Antarctic Data CentreKingstonAustralia

Personalised recommendations