Advertisement

World-View of Protolanguage Speakers as Inferred from Semantics of Sound Symbolic Words: A Case of Japanese Mimetics

  • Sotaro Kita

Abstract

The biggest challenge in the study of language evolution is the fact that language does not leave fossil records in the rock. However, it has been argued that some reminants of earlier forms of language has been “fossilized” in modern language. (1990) suggested that syntactic properties of “protolanguage” (a communication system that is a precursor to modern language) can be seen in utterances produced by Broca’s aphasics, infants in the two-word stage, speakers of a Pidgin language, and Genie, who were deprived of language input until the age of 13 due to abusive imprisonment (Curtis 1977). (2002) suggests that interjections such as ouch, wow, and oh is a fossil from a stage in the development of protolangauge in which words did not combine syntactically and the referents of the words were situation-bound and mostly affective. In this article, we will explore another possible fossil of protolanguage, namely sound-symbolic words. More specifi cally, this article investigates the semantic properties of these words, taking sound symbolic words in Japanese as an example. Sound symbolic words have certain restrictions as to what type of events and states they can refer to. It is suggested that these restrictions might tell us the “world view” held by the speakers of protolanguage that heavily relied on sound symbolic words.

Keywords

Word Class John Benjamin Heavy Object Modern Language Pitch Accent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alpher B (1994) Yir-Yoront ideophones. In: Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala JJ (eds.) Sound symbolism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 161–177Google Scholar
  2. Atoda T, Hoshino K (1995) Giongo gitaigo tsukaikata jiten (Usage dictionary of sound/manner mimetics). Sotakusha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartens A (2000) Ideophones and sound symbolism in Atlantic creoles. Academia Scientiarum Fennica, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  4. Bickerton D (1990) Language&species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.Google Scholar
  5. Childs GT (1994) African ideophones. In: Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala JJ (eds) Sound symbolism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 178–206Google Scholar
  6. Curtis S (1977) Genie: A linguistic study of a modern-day “Wild child”. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Darwin C (1955) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago (The original work published 1871)Google Scholar
  8. Davis R (1961) The fitness of names to drawings: A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology 52:259–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Diffloth G (1972) The notes on expressive meaning. In: Peranteau PM, Levi JN, Phares GC (eds) Papers from the eighth regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL, pp 440–447Google Scholar
  10. Diffloth G (1976) Expressives in Semai, Austroasiatic Studies 1:249–264Google Scholar
  11. Enfield NJ (2005) Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34:181–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Firth JR (1935/1957) The use and distribution of certain English sounds. In: Firth JR (ed) Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford University Press, London, pp 34–46 (Reprinted from Firth JR (1935), English Studies 17:2–12)Google Scholar
  13. Hamano S (1986) The sound symbolic system of Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamano S (1998) The sound symbolic system of Japanese. CSLI Publication&Kuroshio, Stanford, CA&TokyoGoogle Scholar
  15. Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala JJ (1994) Sound symbolism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Ibarretxe-Antuñano I (2006) Sound symbolism and motion in Basque. Lincom, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackendoff R (2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Johansson S (2005) Origins of language: Constraints on hypotheses. John Benjamins, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  19. de Jong N (2001) The ideophone in didinga. In: Voeltz FKE, Kilian-Hatz C (eds) Ideophones. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 121–138Google Scholar
  20. Kindaichi H (1978) Giongo ginatigo gaisetsu (An introduction to mimetics). In: Asano T (ed) Giongo gitaigo jiten (Mimetics dictionary) Kadokawa, Tokyo, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  21. Kita S (1993) Language and thought interface: A study of spontane ous gestures and Japanese mimetics. University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  22. Kita S (1997) Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35:379–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kita S (2001) Semantic schism and interpretive integration in Japanese sentences with a mimetic: A reply to Tsujimura. Linguistics 39: 419–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Köhler W (1929) Gestalt psychology. Liveright Publishing Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Limber J (1982) What can chimps tell us about the origin of language? In: Kuczaj S (ed) Language development, vol 2. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 429–469Google Scholar
  26. Majid A, Bowerman M, Kita S, Haun DB, Levinson SCL (2004) Can language restructure cognition? The case of space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:108–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matsumoto Y (1997) Kuukan idoo no gengohyoogen to sono kakuchoo (Linguistic expression of motion in space, and their extensions). In: Tanaka S, Matsumoto Y (eds) Kuukan to idoo no hyoogen (Expressions of space and motion). Kenkyuusha, Tokyo, pp 125–230Google Scholar
  28. McCawley JD (1968) The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. Mouton, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  29. McGregor W (2001) Ideophones as the source of verbs in northern Australian languages. In: Voeltz FKE, Kilian-Hatz C (eds) Ideophones. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 205–221Google Scholar
  30. Mikone E (2001) Ideophones in Balto-Finnic languages. In: Voeltz FKE, Kilian-Hatz C (eds) Ideophones. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 223–234Google Scholar
  31. Morton ES (1994) The biological bases of sound symbolism. In: Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala JJ (eds) Sound symbolism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 348–365Google Scholar
  32. Msimang CT, Poulos G (2001) The ideophone in Zulu: A re-examination of conceptual and descriptive notions. In: Voeltz FKE, Kilian-Hatz C (eds) Ideophones. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 235–249Google Scholar
  33. Müller FM (1866) Lectures on the science of language. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Newmeyer FJ (1993) Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68: 756–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nuckolls JB (1996) Sounds like life. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Nuckolls JB (1999) The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28:225–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ohala JJ (1994) The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In: Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala JJ (eds) Sound symbolism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 325–347Google Scholar
  38. Ramachandran VS, Hubbard EM (2001) Synaesthesia—A window into perception, thought, and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8:3–34Google Scholar
  39. Sapir E (1929) The status of linguistics as science. Language 5:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. de Saussure F (1983) Course in general linguistics. R. Harris, trans. Open Court, La Salle, IL (Original work published 1916)Google Scholar
  41. Schultze-Berndt E (2001) Ideophone-like characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung (Australia). In: Voeltz FKE, Kilian-Hatz C (eds) Ideophones. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 355–374Google Scholar
  42. Senghas A, Kita S, Özyürek A (2004) Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science 305:1779–1782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Voeltz FKE, Kilian-Hatz C (eds) (2001) Ideophones. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  44. Watson RL (2001) A comparison of some Southeast Asian ideophones with some African ideophones. In: Voeltz FKE, Kilian-Hatz C (eds) Ideophones. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 385–405Google Scholar
  45. Whorf BL (1956) Science and linguistics. In: Carroll JB (ed) Language thought and reality. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 207–219 (The original work published 1940)Google Scholar
  46. Wray A (2000) Holistic utterances in protolanguage: The link from primates to humans. In: Knight C, Studdert-Kennedy M, Hurford J (eds) Evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form. Cambridge University Press, West Nyack, NY, pp 285–302Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sotaro Kita
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations