Advertisement

Strategy for the reallocation of plantations to semi-natural forest for the conservation of endangered riparian tree species

  • Satoshi Ito
  • Yasushi Mitsuda
  • G. Peter Buckley
  • Masahiro Takagi

Abstract

Riparian forests provide habitat for rare or infrequent plant species (Sakio 1997; Suzuki et al. 2002; Sakio & Yamamoto 2002) including several endangered trees (Ito et al. 2003, Ito et al. 2004; Ito & Nogami 2005), and therefore have high conservation value. However, mountainous riparian forests in Japan, particularly in the warmtemperate region, have been heavily exploited or converted to plantations of evergreen conifers such as sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) or hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa Sieb. et Zucc.) because of their high site productivity (Ito et al. 2003). This has resulted in a severe decline in habitat for rare riparian trees (Ito et al. 2004; Ito & Nogami 2005). Most of the rare tree species dependent on riparian habitat cannot complete their life history beneath the dense canopy of planted conifers because their reproduction (flowering and fruiting) usually requires bright crown conditions. Thus, in addition to maintaining remnant populations in natural forest patches, an important strategy for conserving these rare riparian trees is to restore habitat by re-converting suitable portions of the conifer plantations to semi-natural forest (Ito et al. 2004).

Keywords

Debris Flow Seed Dispersal Habitat Quality Riparian Forest Seed Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Environment Agency of Japan (2000) Threatened wildlife of Japan — Red Data Book 2nd ed. Vol. 8 Vascular Plants. Japan Wildlife Research Center, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. Pranklin J (1995) Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modeling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Prog Physic Geog 19:447–449Google Scholar
  3. Franklin J (1998) Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climate and terrain-derived variables. J Veg Sci 9:733–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ito S, Matsuda A, Nogami K (2000) Population structure and dynamics of Quercus hondae Makino 1. Size structure and spatial distribution in a small catchment area. Proceedings of the 43rd Symposium of the International Association for Vegetation Science, Nagano, Japan, pp 130Google Scholar
  6. Ito S, Mitsuda Y, Buckley GP (2004) Reallocation strategy of semi-natural forest patches for conservation of Quercus hondae Makino, an endangered species (in Japanese with English summary). Landscape Ecol Manage 9(1):18–25Google Scholar
  7. Ito S, Mitsuda Y, Gi N, Takagi M and Nogami K (2006) Modeling potential habitats for Lagerstroemia subcostata var. fauriei, a rare riparian species on Yakushima Island, by analysis of GIS-derived topographic factors. Veg Sci 23:153–161Google Scholar
  8. Ito S, Nakagawa M, Buckley GP, Nogami K (2003). Species richness in sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in southeastern Kyushu, Japan. The effects of stand type and age on understory trees and shrubs. J For Res 8:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ito S, Nogami K (2005) Species composition and environments of riparian forests consisting of Lagerstroemia subcostata var. fauriei, an endangered species on Yakushima Island. Veg Sci 22:15–23 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  10. Ito S, Ohtsuka K, Yamashita T (2007) Ecological distribution of seven evergreen Quercus species in southern and eastern Kyushu, Japan. Veg Sci 24:53–63Google Scholar
  11. Kirby KJ, Buekley GP, Good JEG. (1999). Maximising the value of new farm woodland biodiversity at a landscape scale. In: Burgess PJ, Brierley DR, Morris J, Evans J (eds) Farm woods for the future. Bios Scientific Pub, Oxford, pp 45–55Google Scholar
  12. Mashiba S (1973) The Cyclobalanopsis hondae forests in Kyushu. J Geobot 21:36–41 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. Mitsuda Y, Ito S, Sakamoto S. (2007) Predicting the site index of sugi plantations from GIS derived environmental factors in Miyazaki Prefecture. J For Res 12:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miyawaki A (1980) Vegetation of Japan-Yakushima. Shibundo, Tokyo (in Japanese, with English abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Miyawaki A (1981) Vegetation of Japan-Kyushu. Shibundo, Tokyo (in Japanese, with English abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Nakamura F, Inahara S (2007) Fluvial geomorphic disturbances and life history traits of riparian tree species. In: Johnson EA, Miyanishi K (eds) Plant disturbance ecology: the process and the response. Academic Press, New York, pp 283–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Næsset E (1997) Geographical information systems in long-term forest management and planning with special reference to preservation of biological diversity: a review. For Ecol Manage 93:121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Quine CP, Humphrey JW, Purdy K, Ray D (2002) An approach to predicting the potential forest composition and disturbance regime for a highly modified landscape: a pilot study of Strathdon in the Scottish Highlands. Silva Fenn, 36:233–247Google Scholar
  19. Sakio H (1997) Effects of natural disturbance on the regeneration of riparian forests in a Chichibu Mountains, central Japan. Plant Ecol 132:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sakio H, Yamamoto F eds. (2002) Ecology of Riparian Forests. Univ Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan. 206p (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  21. Suzuki W, Osumi K, Masaki T, Takahashi K, Daimaru H, Hoshizaki K (2002) Disturbance regimes and community structures of a riparian and an adjacent stand in the Kanumazawa Riparian Research Forest, northern Japan. For Ecol Manage 157:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wimberly MC, Spies TA (2001a) Influences of environment and disturbance on forest patterns in coastal Oregon watersheds. Ecology 82(5):1443–1459Google Scholar
  23. Wimberly MC, Spies TA (2001b) Predicting spatial patterns of understory conifer regeneration in a Pacific Northwest forest landscape. Appl Veg Sci 4:277–286Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satoshi Ito
    • 1
  • Yasushi Mitsuda
    • 2
  • G. Peter Buckley
    • 3
  • Masahiro Takagi
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Forest Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of MiyazakiMiyazakiJapan
  2. 2.Forestry and Forest Product Research InstituteTsukuba, IbarakiJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Life SciencesImperial CollegeAshfordUK
  4. 4.Filed Science Center, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of MiyazakiMiyazakiJapan

Personalised recommendations