Informed Systems Approach

  • Andrzej P. Wierzbicki
Conference paper


Starting with a discussion of the impact of systems science and technology on the current change of understanding the world, this paper describes the need of change of many basic paradigms and theories. This includes the need of a new understanding of systems science. However, this understanding is related to interdisciplinary knowledge integration; thus, it is necessary first to review new micro-theories of knowledge creation. After this review, the concept of intercultural and interdisciplinary, informed systemic integration is presented and followed by conclusions.


System Science Tacit Knowledge Rational Theory Soft System Methodology Technology Creation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ashby, W.R. (1958) Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1:83–99.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertallanfy, L. (1956) General systems theory. General Systems 1:1–10.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braudel, F. (1979) Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme, XV–XVIII. siécle. Armand Colin, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Checkland, P.B. (1978) The origins and nature of “hard” systems thinking. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 5:99.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Comte, A. (1830–42) La mèthode positive en seize leçcons (Polish translation: Metoda pozytywna w 16 wykładach, PWN 1961, Cracow).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Findeisen, W., Bailey, F.N., Brdyś, M., Malinowski, K., Tatjewski, P., Woźniak, A. (1980) Control and Coordination in Hierarchical Systems. J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foucalt, M. (1972) The Order of Things: an Archeology of Human Sciences. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gadamer, H.-G. (1975) Warheit und Methode. Grundzge einer philosophishen. Hermeneutik. J.B.C. Mohr (Siebeck), Tbingen.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gasson, S. (2004) The management of distributed organizational knowledge. In Sprague, R.J. (ed) Proceedings of the 37 Hawaii International Conference on. Systems Sciences (HICSS 37). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Ca.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gleick, J. (1987) Chaos: Making a New Science. Viking Penguin, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jung, C.G. (1953) Collected Works. Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kozakiewicz, H. (1992) Epistemologia tradycyjna a problemy wspłczesności. Punkt widzenia socjologa (in Polish, Traditional epistemology and problems of contemporary times. Sociological point of view). In Niżnik, J, ed. Pogranicza. epistemologii (in Polish, The Boundaries of Epistemology). Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press, Chicago (2nd ed.).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Latour, B. (1990) Science in action, in: Postmodern? No, simply a-modern! Steps towards an anthropology of science. Studies in the History and Philosophy of. Science 21.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lorentz, K. (1965) Evolution and Modification of Behavior: a Critical Examination. of the Concepts of the “Learned” and the “Innate” Elements of Behavior. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Motycka, A. (1998) Nauka a nieświadomość (Science and Unconscious, in Polish). Leopoldinum, Wrocław.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakamori, Y. and Sawaragi, Y. (1990) Shinayakana systems approach in environmental management. Proceedings of 11th World Congress of International. Federation of Automatic Control, Tallin. Pergamon Press, vol. 5 pp. 511–516.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakamori, Y. (2000) Knowledge management system toward sustainable society. Proceedings of First International Symposium on Knowledge and System. Sciences, JAIST, pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company. How. Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nyquist, H. (1932) Regeneration theory. Bell System Technical Journal 11:126–147.MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1984) Order Out of Chaos. Bantam, New York.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. and Nonaka, I. (2000) Enabling Knowledge Creation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wiener, N. (1948) Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal. and the Machine. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wierzbicki, A.P. (1988) Education for a new cultural era of informed reason. In Richardson, J.G. (ed) Windows of Creativity and Inventions, Lomond, Mt. Airy, PA.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wierzbicki, A.P. (1997) On the role of intuition in decision making and some ways of multicriteria aid of intuition. Multiple Criteria Decision Making 6:65–78.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wierzbicki, A.P., Makowski, M. and Wessels, J. (2000) Model-Based Decision. Support Methodology with Environmental Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston-Dordrecht.MATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wierzbicki, A.P., Jankowski, P., Łoniewski, D. and Wójcik, G. (2003) Computer. Networks — a Multimedia Textbook (in Polish), Sieci komputerowe: podrȩcznik. multimedialny. Instytut Łączności, Ośrodek Informatyki and Politechnika Warszawska, Ośrodek Kształcenia na Odległość, Witryna OKNO, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wierzbicki, A.P. and Nakamori, Y. (2005) Creative Space. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wittgenstein, L. (1922) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej P. Wierzbicki
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.21st Century COE Program: Technology Creation Based on Knowledge ScienceJAIST (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)Japan
  2. 2.National Institute of TelecommunicationsPoland

Personalised recommendations