Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discovering Mind: Development of Mentalizing in Human Children

  • Chapter
Origins of the Social Mind

Abstract

For human infants, agents—other humans—are the fundamental units of their social world. Agents are very special stimuli to infants. Researchers of objectperson differentiation have proposed a set of rules that infants may use during their interaction with people as opposed to objects. For example, (1990) suggested that infants may perceive people as perceptual events that are both self-propelled and goal-directed objects. In such case, adults also perceive people as agents with intention. (1995, p. 60) described an infant’s concept of human as follows: “Three aspects of human interactions that are accessible in principle to young infants are contingency (humans react to one another), reciprocity (humans respond in kind to one to anther’s actions), and communication (humans supply one another with information).” Spelke et al. showed that infants may interpreter an object’s movement with these three principles and the “principle of contact.” To explain the contact principle, they used the habituation procedure and showed that infants tended to assume that an object, if it moves, should have been set in motion by the push from another object (or person). On the other hand, there is no need to apply an external force for a social agent to move. They demonstrated that this kind of perception of agency has appeared in 7-month-olds. Agents are not simply physical objects with new properties added to them. On the contrary, they are entities of an animacy that can move on their own, breath, eat, drink, look, and engage in actions with objects or interact with other agents (Gomez 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adamson LB, Frick JE (2003) The still face: a history of a shared experimental paradigm. Infancy 4:451–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asada M, Kuniyoshi Y (2006) Robot intelligence vol 4. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin DA, Baird JA, Saylor MM, Clark MA (2001) Infants parse dynamie action. Child Dev 72:708–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barr R, Hayne H (2000) Age-related changes in imitation: implications for memory development. In: Rovee-Collier C, Lipsitt LP, Hayne H (eds) Progress in infancy research. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 21–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Basili JN (1976) Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events. J Pers Soc Psychol 33:680–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer PJ, Wiebe SA, Waters JM, Bangston SK (2001) Re-exposure breeds recall: effects of experience on 9-month-olds’ ordered recall. J Exp Child Psychol 80:174–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behne T, Carpenter M, Call J, Tomasello M (2005) Unwilling versus unable: infants’ understanding of intentional action. Dev Psychol 41:328–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellagamba F, Tomasello M (1999) Re-enacting intended acts: comparing 12 and 18-month-olds. Infant Behav Dev 22:277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow AE, DeCoste C (2003) Sensitivity to social contingency from mothers and strangers in 2−, 4−, and 6-month-old infants. Infancy 4:111–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair C (2002) School readiness: integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children’s functioning at school entry. Am Psychol 57:111–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks PJ, Hanauer JB, Padowska B, Rosman H (2003) The role of selective attention in preschoolers’ rule use in a novel dimensional card sort. Cognit Dev 18:195–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks R, Meltzoff AN (2002) The importance of eyes: how infants interpret adult looking behavior. Dev Psychol 38:958–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson SM (2005) Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children. Dev Neuropsychol 28:595–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson SM, Moses LJ, Breton C (2002) How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant Child Dev 11:73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley SJ, Kanda T (2005) Friendly machines: interaction oriented robots today and tomorrow. Alternation 12:79–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter M, Nagell K, Tomasello M (1998) Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 63(4): serial no. 255

    Google Scholar 

  • Csibra G (2003) Teleological and referential understanding of action in infancy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 358:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich WH, Lea SEG (1994) Visual perception of intentional motion. Perception 23:253–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Murphy M, Maszk P, Smith M, Karbon M (1995) The role of emotionality and regulation in children’s social functioning. Child Dev 66: 1239–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farroni T, Massaccesi S, Pividori D, Johnson MH (2004) Gaze following in newborns. Infaney 5:39–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergely G, Csibra G (2004a) Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naïve theory of rational action. Trends Cognit Sci 7:287–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergely G, Csibra G (2004b) The social construction of the cultural mind: Imitative learning as a mechanism of human pedagogy. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems. Special Issue: Making Minds 11(6):463–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergely G, Nadasdy Z, Csibra G, Biro S (1995) Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition 56:165–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez JC (2004) Apes, monkeys, children, and the growth of mind. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham SA, Nilsen ES, Nayer SL (2007) Following the intentional eye: the role of gaze cues in early word learning. In: Flom R, Lee K, Muir D (eds) Ontogeny of gaze processing. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hains SMJ, Muir DW (1996) Effect of stimulus contingency in infant-adult interactions. Infant Behav Dev 19:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider F, Simmer S (1944). Ah experimental study of apparent behavior Am J Psychol 57:243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C (1998) Executive function in preschoolers: links with theory of mind and verbal ability. Br J Dev Psychol 16:233–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C, Dunn J, White A (1998). Trick or treat? Uneven understanding of mind and emotion and executive dysfunction in “hard to manage” preschoolers. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 39:981–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro H, Miyashita T (2005) Communication robot: the technology for development of the robots interacting with humans. Ohmsha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Itakura S, Ishida H, Kanda T, Lee K, Ishiguro H (in press) How to build an intentional android: infants’ imitation of a robot’s goal-directed actions. Infancy

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MH, Morton J (1991) Biology and cognitive development: the case of face recognition. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SC (2003) Detecting agents. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 358:549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SC, Booth A, O’Hearn K (2001) Inferring the goals of nonhuman agent. Cognit Dev 16:637–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SC, Slaughter V, Carey S (1998) Whose gaze will infants follow? Features that elicit gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Dev Sci 1:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloo D, Perner J (2003) Training transfer between card sorting and false belief understanding: helping children apply conflicting descriptions. Child Dev 74:1823–1839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kloo D, Perner J (2005) Disentangling dimensions in the dimensional change card-sorting task. Dev Sci 8:44–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kochanska G, Murray KT, Jacques TY, Koenig AL, Vandegeest KA (1996) Inhibitory control in young children and its role in emerging internalization. Child Dev 67: 490–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kochanska G, Murray KT, Harlan ET (2000) Effortful control in early childhood: Contonuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Dev Psychol 36:220–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima H (2005) Children-robot interaction: from interaction to cognition. Presented at the ESF research conference on brain development and cognition in human infants, “From action to cognition,” Acquafredda di Maratea, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmeier VWK, Bloom P (2003) Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychol Sci 14:402–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Baillargeon R (2005) Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants. Psychol Sci 16:601–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H (2006a) The uncanny advantage of using androids in social and cognitive science research. Interact Stud 7(3):297–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H (2006b) Opening Pandora’s uncanny box: Reply to commentaries on “The uncanny advantage of using androids in social and cognitive science research” Interact Stud 7(3):361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff AN (1995) Understanding the intentions of others; Re-enactment of intended acts. Dev Psychol 31:838–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff AN (1999) Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts. Dev Psychol 31:838–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff AN (2005) Imitation and other minds: the “Like Me” hypothesis. In: Hurley S, Cater N (eds) Perspectives on imitation: from neuroscience to social science, vol 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 55–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff AN, Moore MK (1977) Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198:75–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff AN, Moore MK (1997) Explaining facial imitation: a theoretical model. Early Dev Parent 6:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriguchi Y, Lee K, Itakura S (2007) Social transmission of disinhibition in young children. Dev Sci 10:481–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muir DW, Nadel J (1998) Infant social perception. In: Slater A (ed) Perceptual development: visual, auditory, and speech perception in infancy. Psychology Press, London, pp 247–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Munakata Y, Yeris BE (2001) All together now: when dissociations between knowledge and action disappear. Psychol Sci 12:335–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray L, Trevarthen C (1985) Emotional regulation of interactions between two-montholds and their mothers. In: Field TM, Fox NA (eds) Social perception in infants. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp 177–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel J, Carchon I, Kervella C, Marcelli D, Reserbat-Plantey D (1999) Expectancies for social contingency in 2-month-olds. Dev Sci 2:164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okanda M, Itakura S (2008) One-month old infants’ sensitivity to social contingency from mothers and strangers. Psychol Rep 102:293–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perner J (1998) The meta-intentional nature of executive function and theory of mind. In: Carruthers P, Boucher J (eds) Language and thought. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner J, Lang B, Kloo D (2002) Theory of mind and self-control: more than a common problem of inhibition. Child Dev 73:752–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AT, Wellman HM (2005) Infants’ understanding of object-directed action. Cognition 98(2):137–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin-Dubois D (1999) Infant’s distinction between animate and inanimate objects: the origin of naïve psychology. In: Rochat P (ed) Early social cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 257–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack D (1990) The infant’s theory of mind. Cognition 36:1–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn PC, Slater A (2003) Pace perception at birth and beyond. In: Pascalis O, Slater A (eds) The development of face processing in infancy and early childhood: current perspectives. Nova, Hauppauge, NY, pp 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochat P, Neisser U, Marian V (1998) Are young infants sensitive to interpersonal contingency? Infant Behav Dev 21:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh M, Xu F, Carlson S, Moses L, Lee K (2006) The development of executive functioning and theory-of-mind: a comparison of Chinese and U.S. preschoolers. Psychol Sci 17:74–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu YA, Johnson SC (2004) Infants’ attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. Dev Sci 7:425–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke ES, Phillips A, Woodward AL (1995) Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (eds) Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate. Oxford Clarendon Press, pp 45–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Striano T (2004) Direction of regard and the still-face effect in the first year: does intention matter? Child Dev 75:468–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Towse JN, Redbond J, Houston-Price CMT, Cook S (2000) Understanding the dimensional change card sort: perspectives from task success and failure. Cognit Dev 15:347–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronick E, Als H, Adamson L, Wise S, Brazelton T (1978) The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 17:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji A, Itakura S (2003) Attribution of dispositional states in infancy. In: Proceedings of Information Processing Society, Kansai Branch (in Japanese), pp 127–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward AL (1998) Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition 69:1–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo PD, Frye D, Rapus T (1996) An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them. Cognit Dev 11:37–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Shoji Itakura

  2. Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Mako Okanda (Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science)

  3. University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan

    Yusuke Moriguchi (Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science)

Authors
  1. Shoji Itakura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mako Okanda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yusuke Moriguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Shoji Itakura Ph.D. (Associate Professor) & Kazuo Fujita Ph.D. (Professor) (Associate Professor) &  (Professor)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Itakura, S., Okanda, M., Moriguchi, Y. (2008). Discovering Mind: Development of Mentalizing in Human Children. In: Itakura, S., Fujita, K. (eds) Origins of the Social Mind. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-75179-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation