A Theory of Construction of Norm and Meaning: Osawa’s Theory of Body
Our intellectual world requires not only knowledge of natural sciences but also human sciences (Sugiman 2006). The two areas of inquiry differ from each other in meta-theory. Natural sciences embrace a philosophy of logical positivism (empiricism) in which an outer or objective world is assumed to exist independently from an inner or subjective world. That division, of inner and outer worlds, does not correspond to a physical boundary between inner and outer sides of a skin. For example, the stomach, part of the outer world in the human body, might be experienced as painful by an inner world if the wrong food is eaten. An inner world, i.e., a world of mental process, is assumed to be somewhere within, definitely not outside, the skin. This common image of a person is called the mind-in-a-body paradigm (Sugiman 1999).
KeywordsSocial Constructionism Communal Experience Outer World Physical Thing Liar Paradox
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Gergen K (1999) An invitation to social construction. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Osawa M (1988) Algebra of action (Koi no daisugaku). Seidosha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Osawa M (1990) Comparative sociology of body (Shintai no hikaku-shakaigaku), vol. 1. Keiso-shobo, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Spencer-Brown G (1969) Laws of form. George Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Sugiman T (1999) Beyond the mind-in-a-body paradigm. In: Sugiman T, Karasawa M, Liu JH, Ward C (Eds) Progress in Asian social psychology, vol. 2. Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa, Seoul, pp 253–256Google Scholar
- Yanabu A (1982) How Western concepts were translated into the Japanese language (Hon’yakugo seiritsu jijo). Iwanami, TokyoGoogle Scholar