Advertisement

Narrative Mode of Thought in Disaster Damage Reduction: A Crossroad for Narrative and Gaming Approaches

  • Katsuya Yamori

Abstract

The “narrative mode of thought,” proposed by J. S. Bruner (1986), has galvanized research in many fields, from developmental and clinical psychology to sociology, social welfare, management, and even medical science. The narrative mode stands in sharp contrast to “logico-scientific or paradigmatic modes of thought” and, though their objectives vary widely, sets of research studies in each of the above fields now display some common features based on the narrative approach. Their cumulative impact supports the claim that a fundamental epistemological and methodological shift, called “narrative turn,” has occurred almost simultaneously across multiple research domains.

Keywords

Game Player Disaster Response Disaster Preparedness Disaster Reduction Temporary Housing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asian Disaster Reduction Center (2005) Tsunami awareness educational materials: “Inamura no Hi.” Retrieved September 10, 2006 from http://www.adrc.or.jp/publications/inamura/top.html
  2. Beck U (1986) Risk society: towards a new modernity (Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne). Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruner J (1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Duke R (1975) Gaming: the future’s language. Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Kikkawa T, Yamori K, Ajiro T, Hayashi H (2004) “Crossroad: Kobe”: a training tool for disaster preparedness and response. In: Kriz WC, Eberle T (Eds) Bridging the gap: transforming knowledge into action through gaming and simulation. SAGSAGA, Munich, pp 245–253Google Scholar
  6. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. McAdams DP, Aubin ES (1998) Generativity and adult development: how and why we care for the next generation. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Weick EK (1995) Sense-making in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks CAGoogle Scholar
  9. Winslade J, Monk G (1999) Narrative counseling in schools. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks CAGoogle Scholar
  10. Yamori K (2005) The way people recall and narrate their traumatic experiences of a disaster: an action research on a voluntary group of story-tellers. In: Kashima Y, Endo Y, Kashima E, Leung C, McClure J (Eds) Progress in Asian social psychology, vol. 4. Kyoyook-kwahak-sa, Seoul, pp 183–199Google Scholar
  11. Yamori K, Kikkawa T (2005) Crossroad: Kobe: a new discussion tool for enhancing grassroots resistance to natural disasters. Paper presented at the 14th General Meeting of European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Wurzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. Yamori K, Kikkawa T, Ajiro T (2005) Gaming approach to disaster risk communication (Gemu de manabu risuku komyunikeishon). Nakanishiya Shuppann, Kyoto (Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katsuya Yamori
    • 1
  1. 1.Disaster Prevention Research InstituteKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations