Anti-seismic Design, Diagnostics and Reinforcement for Concrete Structures

  • Koichi Maekawa
Part of the cSUR-UT Series: Library for Sustainable Urban Regeneration book series (LSUR, volume 4)

In the interest of having performance-based design offer more transparency to clients and taxpayers, performance assessment methods occupy a central position from the viewpoint of structural mechanics and engineering. This rational way of assuring the overall quality of infrastructures may create cost-beneficial design and construction that exactly satisfy several requirements assigned to engineers. Life-cycle-based diagnostics of structures is required explicitly by societies and organizations. Furthermore, there is emerging a greater need to verify the remaining functionality of damaged facilities in order to extend their service life. To meet these challenges, it is desirable to formulatean explicit system for the prediction and simulation of structural life serviceability and safety under specified loads such as earthquake and ambient conditions

In this chapter, the author proposes an integrated platform of solid mechanics and hydrothermal dynamics of materials and structures with multi-scales of referential control volume on which each physicochemical factor is applied. In more detail, a constitutive model is discussed with regard to cracking in reinforced concrete (RC) elements, and a mathematical overlay of hydrothermal state variables is presented for multiscale and multichemical mechanical coupling with soil foundation. Recent application of the multi-scale approach to practical problems is introduced for urban regeneration, and the direction of future development is discussed as an integrated knowledge-base of structural concrete and soil foundation


Fatigue Life Reinforce Concrete Soil Foundation Reinforce Concrete Beam Shear Span 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Collins, M.P. and Vecchio, F. (1982) The Response of Reinforced Concrete to In-Plane Shear and Normal Stresses. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
  2. El-Kashif, K.F. and Maekawa, K. (2004) “Time-dependent post-peak softening of RC members in flexure”, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2(3): 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guo X.H. Gilbert R.I. 2002 An experimental study of reinforced concrete flat slabs under sustained service loads. UNICIV Report No. R-407Google Scholar
  4. Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE) (1999) Recommendation for Structural Performance Verification of LNG Underground Storage Tanks. Tokyo: Concrete Library of JSCE, No. 98Google Scholar
  5. Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE) (2005a) Report on Safety and Serviceability of ASR Damaged RC Structures. Tokyo: Concrete library of JSCE, No.124Google Scholar
  6. Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE) (2005b) Intermediate technical report on damage and repair of Tarui highway bridge. Special subcommittee reportGoogle Scholar
  7. Kakuta, Y. and Fujita, Y. (1982) “Fatigue strength of reinforced concrete slabs failing by punching shear”, Proceedings of JSCE, (317): 149–157Google Scholar
  8. Komine, H. and Ogata, N. (1999) “Experimental study of swelling characteristic of sand-bentonite mixture for nuclear waste disposal”, Soils and Foundations 39(2): 83–97Google Scholar
  9. Mabrouk, R., Ishida, T. and Maekawa, K. (2004) “A unified solidification model of hardening concrete composite for predicting the young age behavior of concrete”, Cement and Concrete Composites, (26): 453–461Google Scholar
  10. Maeda, Y. and Matsui, S. (1984) “Fatigue of reinforced concrete slabs under trucking wheel load”, Proceedings of JCI (6): 221–224Google Scholar
  11. Maekawa, K., Pimanmas, A. and Okamura, H. (2003) Nonlinear Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete. London: Spon PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Maekawa, K., Chaube, R.P. and Kishi, T. (1999) Modeling of Concrete Performance. London: Spon PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Matsui, S. (1987) “Fatigue strength of RC-slabs of highway bridge by wheel running machine and influence of water on fatigue”, Proceedings of JCI, 9(2): 627–632Google Scholar
  14. Nakarai, K., Ishida, T., Maekawa, K., et al. (2005a) “Calcium leaching modeling of strong coherency with micropore formation of porous media and ion phase equilibrium”, Journal of Materials, Concrete Structures and Pavements, JSCE, 802(69): 61–78Google Scholar
  15. Nakarai, K., Ishida, T. and Maekawa, K. (2005b) “Multi-phase physicochemical modeling of soil-cementitious material interaction”, Journal of Materials, Concrete Structures and Pavements, JSCE, 802(69): 137–154Google Scholar
  16. Nakarai K, Usui T, Ishida T (2003) Performance evaluation of engineered barrier based on thermodynamic modeling of coupled cementitious material and bentonite. The Tenth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-10), 2003.8Google Scholar
  17. Perdikaris, P.C. and Beim, S.R. (1988) “RC bridge decks under pulsating and moving load”, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 114(3): 591–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Perdikaris, P.C., Beim, S.R. and Bousias, S.N. (1989) “Slab continuity effect on ultimate and fatigue strength of reinforced concrete bridge deck models”, Structural Journal ACI, 86(4): 483–491Google Scholar
  19. Pimanmas, A. and Maekawa, K. (2001) “Finite element analysis and behavior of pre-cracked reinforced concrete members in shear”, Magazine of Concrete Research, 53(4): 263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sato, H. et al. (1995) “Diffusion behavior for Se and Zr in sodium-bentonite”, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, XVIII(353): 269–276Google Scholar
  21. Satoh, Y. et al. (2003) “Shear behavior of RC member with corroded shear and longitudinal reinforcing steels”, Proceedings of the JCI, 25(1): 821–826Google Scholar
  22. Soraoka, H., Adachi, M., Honda, K., et al. (2001) “Experimental study on deformation performance of underground box culvert”, Proceedings of the JCI, 23(3): 1123–1128Google Scholar
  23. Sugano, T. et al. (2001) “Numerical analysis on uneven settlement and seismic performance of Tokyo brick bridges”, Structural Engineering Design (17) JR-East: 96–109Google Scholar
  24. Toongoenthong, K. and Maekawa, K. (2005a) “Multi-mechanical approach to structural performance assessment of corroded RC members in shear”, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 3(1): 107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toongoenthong, K. and Maekawa, K. (2005b) “Simulation of coupled corrosive product formation, migration into crack and its propagation in reinforced concrete sections”, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 3(2): 253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Toongoenthong, K. and Maekawa, K. (2004) “Interaction of pre-induced damages along main reinforcement and diagonal shear in RC members”, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2(3): 431–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koichi Maekawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringThe University of TokyoBunkyo-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations