Advertisement

Modelling Migration in the Sahel: An Alternative to Cost-Benefit Analysis

  • Bogdan Werth
  • Scott Moss

Abstract

Environmental issues pose enormous risks for all populations, but especially for the vulnerable. There have been many attempts to measure the risks and the costs of environmental episodes. Such measurement is seen in many quarters as a matter of increasing urgency as a result of the prospect of climate change. The economic approach to vulnerability measurement is based on cost-benefit analysis (CBA). CBA itself is predicated on the proposition that all relevant impacts of climate change can be given a numerical value. A clear argument for this approach was offered by the late [14]. The value to be chosen is what the “market” value of the marginal costs and benefits. Where there is no relevant market, individuals must be able to state what they would pay to be able to stay where they are or the money they would accept as an inducement to move from where they are. In many, perhaps most, cases valuation is by no means so simple since actions are taken in response to environmental and political events. In this paper, we investigate one such case concerning the Sahel region at the edge of the Sahara.

Keywords

Social Link Social Simulation Declarative Approach Declarative Modelling Remittance Migration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Cloud: Climate outlooks and agent-based simulation of adaptation in South Africa, <http://www.geog.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/cloud/> URL.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Jess: Java expert system shell, <http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/> URL.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Repast: recursive porous agent simulation, <http://repast.sourceforge.net> URL.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Sdml: Strictly declarative modelling language, <http://sdml.cfpm.org/> URL.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. J. ALAM, R. MEYER, J. Z. Modeling the socio-economic impact of hiv/aids in a South African village. 2006.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    B. EDMONDS, S. MOSS, S. W. Logic, reasoning and a programming language for simulating economic and business processes with artificially intelligent agents. C. R. N. 96-09, Ed.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    BHARWANI, S., BITHELL, M., DOWNING, T. E., NEW, M., WASHINGTON, R., AND ZIERVOGEL, G. Multi-agent modeling of climate outlooks and food security on a community garden scheme in limpopo, south africa. Philosophical transactions of the royal society (2005).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    FRANK, R. H. Why is cost-benefit analysis so controversial? The Journal of Legal Studies 29, Cost-Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic, and Philosophical Perspectives, 2 (Jun 2000), pp. 913–930. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0047-25303E2.0.CO URLGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    GRANOVETTER, M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91,3 (November 1985), 481–510.Google Scholar
  10. [l0]
    HICKLER T, EKLUNDH L, S. J. E. A. Precipitation controls sahel greening trend. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS 32(21), Art. No. L21415 (November 12 2005).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    LOVETT JC, MIDGLEY GF, B. P. Climate change and ecology in africa. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY 43(3) (September 2005), 167–169.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    MOSS, S. Critical incident management: An empirically derived computational model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, I,4 (1998).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    MOSS, S., GAYLARD, H., WALLIS, S., and EDMONDS, B. Sdml: A multi-agent language for organizational modelling. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 4,1 (1996), 43–69.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    PEARCE, D. W. The social cost of carbon and its policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19,3 (2003), 362–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. MOSS, E. N. Having fun being useful, extended abstract. AAMAS 05, Workshop 21, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    SCOTT MOSS, B. E. Sociology and simulation: Statistical and qualitative cross-validation. American Journal of Sociology 110,4 (January 2005), 1095–1131.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    SCOTT MOSS, B. E. Towards good social science. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 8,4 (October 2005). Stable URL: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/13.html URL.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    WANG G, ELTAHIR EAB, F. J. P. D. L. S. Decadal variability of rainfall in the sahel: results from the coupled genesis-ibis atmosphere-biosphere model. CLIMATE DYNAMICS 22(6-7) (Jun 2004), 625–637.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    ZHANG JY, DONG WJ, F. C. Impact of land surface degradation in northern china and southern Mongolia on regional climate. B 50(1) (January 2005), 75–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bogdan Werth
    • 1
  • Scott Moss
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre For Policy ModellingManchester Metropolitan University Business SchoolManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations