Learning and Belief Dissemination Through Co-action

  • Juliette Rouchier
  • Hironori Shiina


The paper presents results of simulations on belief dissemination in an universe where agents are situated on an environment. Contrary to most papers on belief dissemination, we propose that the environment has an impact on the interaction of agents and on their learning. We compare two main ways of learning: when agents can and cannot perceive their environment to change their beliefs. We also consider that agents are heterogeneous in their tendency to follow the beliefs of others.


Social Influence Successful Action Social Simulation Artificial Society Accurate Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Axelrod R (1997) The dissemination of culture — A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, P, Redner S (2005) Majority rule dynamics in finite dimensions. Physical Review E 71:, art. no.-036101.Google Scholar
  3. Deffuant G Amblard, F, Weisbuch G, Faure T (2002) How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model. J Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 5: URL Google Scholar
  4. Fortunato, S, Stauffer D (2005). Computer Simulations of Opinions and Their Reactions to Extreme Events [online].Google Scholar
  5. Galam S (1997). Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T=O. PhysicaA. 238:66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hegselmann R, Krause U (2002), Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. J Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 5: URL Google Scholar
  7. Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living, Kluwer Boston.Google Scholar
  8. Moscivic S (1976) Social influence and social change. Academic Press, London New York.Google Scholar
  9. Stauffer D (2005) Sociophysics Simulations II: Opinion Dynamics [online].Google Scholar
  10. Sznajd-Weron K, Sznajd J (2000) Opinion evolution in closed community. International Journal of Modern Physics C 11: 1157–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juliette Rouchier
    • 1
  • Hironori Shiina
    • 2
  1. 1.GREQAMCNRSMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Ishida LabKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations