Abstract
Our visual world contains numerous objects. An important function of the visual system is to recognize an object by comparing perceptual and memory representations. Although we seldom have any problems in recognizing natural objects, which promotes the belief that object recognition is a quite simple process of matching perceptual and memory representations, recognition does in fact involve extremely complicated visual processing. The fact that objects are almost never presented in isolation illustrates the complexity and difficulty of object recognition. The cluttered nature of our visual environment poses an object segmentation problem (including figure/ground segregation problem), which itself is quite difficult. Even if one can successfully segment a set of objects, there is another problem for the visual system to solve: the so-called binding problem. If there are multiple objects, each of which has its own feature values such as shape, color, size, and so on, then how does the visual system properly maintain the correct correspondences of these features? This chapter focuses on this binding problem in both object recognition and visual working memory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alvarez GA, Cavanagh P (2004) The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol Sci 15:106–111
Ashby FG, Prinzmetal W, Ivry R, Maddox WT (1996) A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychol Rev 103:165–192
Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115–147
Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:443–446
Cowan N (2001) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci 24:87–185
Hayworth KJ, Biederman I (2005) Differential fMRI activity produced by variation in parts and relations during object perception. J Vis 5(8):740
Hummel JE, Biederman I (1992) Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol Rev 99:480–517
Imaruoka T, Saiki J, Miyauchi S (2005) Maintaining coherence of dynamic objects requires coordination of neural systems extended from anterior frontal to posterior parietal brain corteces. NeuroImage 26:277–284
Kanwisher NG (1991) Repetition blindness and illusory conjunction: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:404–421.
Luck SJ, Vogel EK (1997) The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390:279–281
Olson IR, Jiang Y (2002) Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the “strong-object” hypothesis. Percept Psychophys 64:1055–106
Pelli DG (1997) The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437–442
Saiki J (2002) Multiple-object permanence tracking: limitation in maintenance and transformation of perceptual objects. In: Hyona J, Munoz DP, Heide W, Radach R (Eds) The Brain’s eye: neurobiological and clinical aspects of oculomotor research (progress in brain research), Vol. 140. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 133–148
Saiki J (2003a) Feature binding in object-file representations of multiple moving items. J Vis 3:6–21
Saiki J (2003b) Spatiotemporal characteristics of dynamic feature binding in visual working memory. Vision Res 43:2107–2123
Saiki J, Miyatsuji H (2007) Feature binding in visual working memory evaluated by type identification paradigm. Cognition 102:49–83
Saiki J, Hummel JE (1998) Connectedness and the part-relation integration in shape perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:227–251
Todd JJ, Marois R (2004) Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature 428:751–754
Vogel EK, Machizawa MG (2004) Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 428:748–751
Vogel EK, Woodman GF, Luck SJ (2001) Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:92–114
Wheeler ME, Treisman A (2002) Binding in short-term visual memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 131:48–64
Xu Y (2002) Limitations of object-based feature encoding in visual short-term memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:458–468
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saiki, J. (2007). Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory. In: Osaka, N., Rentschler, I., Biederman, I. (eds) Object Recognition, Attention, and Action. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73019-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73019-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-73018-7
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-73019-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)