Skip to main content

What is the meaning of “atypical glands suspicious but not diagnostic of adenocarcinoma” in a pathology diagnosis? Is “atypical small acinar proliferation” a pathologic entity?

  • Chapter
Book cover Questions in Daily Urologic Practice
  • 1179 Accesses

Abstract

Atypical glands suspicious but not diagnostic of carcinoma indicate that the pathologic findings are not sufficient for a definitive diagnosis of cancer but suspicious enough for further investigation. Therefore, a rebiopsy should be recommended. Only a definitive diagnosis of carcinoma is an indication for therapy; a suspicious diagnosis should not lead to therapy for prostate cancer such as surgery, irradiation, or hormonal therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kisner HJ (1998) The gray zone. Clin Lab Manage Rev 12:277–280.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein JI (1998) Atypical small acinar proliferation of the prostate gland. Am J Surg Pathol 22:1430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan TY, Epstein JI (1999) Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancer. Urology 53:351–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iczkowski KA, MacLennan GT, Boswick DG (1997) Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsy: clinical significance in 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 21:1489–1495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphy WM (1999) ASAP is a bad idea: atypical small acinar proliferation. Hum Pathol 30:601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein JI (1999) How should atypical prostate needle biopsies be reported? Controversies regarding the term “ASAP”. Hum Pathol 30:1401–1402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iczkowski KA, Cheng L, Qian J, Shanks J, Gadaleanu V, Bostwick DG, Ramnani DM (1999) ASAP is a valid diagnosis: atypical small acinar proliferation. Hum Pathol 30:774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Dowd GL, Miller MC, Orozco R (2000) Analysis of repeated biopsy results within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis. Urology 55:553–559.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein JI, Herawi M (2006) Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol 175:820–834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang Z, Iczkowski KA, Woda BA, Tretiakova M, Yang XJ (2004) P504 immunostaining boosts diagnostic resolution of “suspicious” foci in prostatic needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 121:99–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kronz JD, Shaikh AA, Epstein JI (2001) High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with adjacent atypical glands on prostate biopsy. Hum Pathol 32:389–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). What is the meaning of “atypical glands suspicious but not diagnostic of adenocarcinoma” in a pathology diagnosis? Is “atypical small acinar proliferation” a pathologic entity?. In: Questions in Daily Urologic Practice. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-72819-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-72819-1_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-72818-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-72819-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics