Skip to main content

What clinically useful information should be included in the pathology report on a prostate needle core biopsy? Are there specific microscopic findings useful when assessing cancer staging?

  • Chapter
Questions in Daily Urologic Practice
  • 1182 Accesses

Abstract

Prostate needle core biopsy (PNB) can generate a great deal of information that is useful for assessing the prognosis of prostate cancer and providing essential guidance for successful therapeutic interventions such as radical prostatectomy. If a PNB is positive for adenocarcinoma, the following information should be provided in the pathology report: (1) location of the carcinoma, usually indicated in each part (location); (2) Gleason score (not a single grade) in each core (even for a small focus); (3) the number of positive cores of the total cores examined for each part or side; (4) the percentage of adenocarcinoma in each core and the highest percentage of a single core; (5) the presence of perineural invasion or extraprostatic extension; (6) special features of adenocarcinoma, such as neuroendocrine differentiation and ductal differentiation; and (7) immunohistochemical staining results if available. All these measures can be obtained on visual inspection without a micrometer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Badalament RA, Craig MM, Peller PA, Young DC, Bahn DK, Kochie P, O’Dowd GJ, Veltri RW (1996) An algorithm for predicting nonorgan confined prostate cancer using the results obtained from sextant core biopsies with prostatic specific antigen level. J Urol 156:1375–1380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein JI, Potter SR (2001) The pathological interpretation and significance of prostate needle biopsy findings: implications and current controversies. J Urol 166:402–410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kunz GM, Epstein JI (2003) Should each core with prostate cancer be assigned a separate Gleason score? Hum Pathol 34;911–914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bismar TA, Lewis JS Jr, Vollmer RT, Humphrey PA (2003) Multiple measure of carcinoma extent versus perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy tissue in prediction of pathologic stage in a screening population. Am J Surg Pathol 27:432–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubin MA, Bassily N, Sanda M, Montie J, Strawderman MS, Wojno K (2000) Relationship and significance of greatest percentage of tumor and perineural invasion on needle biopsy in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 24:183–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). What clinically useful information should be included in the pathology report on a prostate needle core biopsy? Are there specific microscopic findings useful when assessing cancer staging?. In: Questions in Daily Urologic Practice. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-72819-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-72819-1_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-72818-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-72819-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics