Advertisement

Multi-Agent Participatory Simulations Between Experimental Economics and Role-Playing Games

  • Paul Guyot
  • Alexis Drogoul
  • Shinichi Honiden
Part of the Springer Series on Agent Based Social Systems book series (ABSS, volume 3)

Abstract

In this paper, we present participatory experiments in economics and role-playing games from an agent-based simulations perspective. In particular, we try to compare these two traditions of participatory approaches to stress identities and differences. After having outlined the lessons of these traditions, we describe multi-agent participatory simulations as a new kind of participatory experiments combining agents and participation more closely, using as an example the methodology we developed to conduct experiments of this new kind.

Multi-agent participatory simulations are described as simulations where agents and players have similar roles and we propose to use assistant agents within these simulations for the purpose of participatory design of protocols or multi-agent systems.

Keywords

Cellular Automaton Multiagent System Experimental Economic Participatory Design Participatory Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamatti, D.F., Sichman, J.S., Rabak, C., Bommel, P., Ducrot, R. and Camargo, M.E.S.A., 2005, Jogoman: A prototype using multi-agent-based simulation and role-playing games in water management. In: Proceedings of the SMAGET-CABM-HEM A Conference.Google Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J., 1995, Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments. Quaterly Journal of Economics 110, 1–22MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barreteau, O. et al., 2003, Our companion modelling approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6Google Scholar
  4. Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F. and Attonaty, J.M., 2001, Role-playing games for opening the black box of multiagent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal river valley irrigated systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4Google Scholar
  5. Camerer, C.F. and Fehr, E., 2003, Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. In Henrich, Boyd, Bowles, Camerer, Fehr, Gintis, McElreath, eds.: Foundations of Human Sociality-Experimental and Ethnographic Evidence from 15 Small-Scale Societies.Google Scholar
  6. Camerer, C.F. and Talley, E., 2004, Experimental law and economics. In Polinsky, A., Shavell, S., eds.: Handbook of Law and Economics.Google Scholar
  7. Camerer, C.F., 2003, Behavioral Game Theory. New York/ Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Capra, C.M., Tanaka, T., Camerer, C.F., Munyan, L., Sovero, V., Wang, L. and Noussair, C., 2005, The impact of simple institutions in experimental economies with poverty trap. Technical Report 0508, Department of Economics, Emory University (Atlanta)Google Scholar
  9. Castro, B. and Weingarten, K., 1970, Towards experimental economics. Journal of Political Economy 78, 598–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etienne, M., 2001, Pine trees-invaders or forerunners in mediterranean-type ecosystems: a controversial point of view. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology 2, 221–232Google Scholar
  11. Etienne, M., 2003, Sylvopast: a multiple target role-playing game to assess negotiation processes in sylvopastoral management planning. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6Google Scholar
  12. Etienne, M., Le Page, C. and Cohen, M., 2003, A step-by-step approach to building land management scenarios based on multiple viewpoints on multi-agent system simulations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, D. and Sunder, S., 1994, Experimental Methods-A Primer For Economists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Guyot, P., Drogoul, A., 2004, Designing multi-agent based participatory simulations. In Coelho, H., Espinasse, B., eds.: Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Agent Based Simulations, Erlangen, San Diego, SCS Publishing House, 32–37Google Scholar
  15. Guyot, P., Drogoul, A., 2005, Two sides of emergence in participatory simulations. In: Proceedings of Social Inspired Computing’ 05.Google Scholar
  16. Guyot, P., Drogoul, A., 2005, Using emergence in participatory simulations to design multi-agent systems. In: International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-05).Google Scholar
  17. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Herbert, G. and McElreath, R., 2001, In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91, 73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill, E.L. and Sally, D., 2002, Dilemmas and bargains: Theory-of-mind, cooperation, and fairness. Working paper, University College LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Mathevet, R., Le Page, C., Etienne, M., Gigot, G., Lefebvre, G., Poulin, B. and Mauchamp, A., 2005, Butorstar: a role-playing game for collective awareness of reedbed wise use. Technical report, In prep.Google Scholar
  20. Nguyen-Duc, M., Boucher, A., Drogoul, A., Duong, V., 2004, Towards participatory design of agent-based simulations an application in air traffic management. In Coelho, H., Espinasse, B., eds.: Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Agent Based Simulations, Erlangen, San Diego, SCS Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  21. Sempé, F., Nguyen-Duc, M., Boucher, A., Drogoul, A., 2005, An artificial maieutic approach for eliciting experts’ knowledge in multi-agent simulations. In: International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-05).Google Scholar
  22. Smith, V.L., 1994, Economics in the laboratory. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 113–131Google Scholar
  23. Toth, F.L., 1988, Policy exercises: objectives and design elements. Simulation and games 19, 235–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsuchiya, S., 1998, Simulation/gaming as an essential enabler of organizational change. Simulation and Gaming 29,400–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wadsworth, Y., 1998, What is participatory action research? Action Research International 2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Guyot
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexis Drogoul
    • 3
  • Shinichi Honiden
    • 2
  1. 1.LIP6Université Pierre et Marie CurieFrance
  2. 2.National Institute of InformaticsJapan
  3. 3.IRD BondyFrance

Personalised recommendations