Political Science and Multi-Agent Simulation: Affinities, Examples and Possibilities

  • Yamakage Susumu
  • Hoshiro Hiroyuki
  • Mitsutsuji Katsuma
  • Sakamoto Takuto
  • Suzuki Kazutoshi
  • Yamamoto Kazuya
Part of the Springer Series on Agent Based Social Systems book series (ABSS, volume 3)


Domestic politics and international relations are fertile fields for the analysis using multi-agent simulation. Both theoretically and empirically, such a technique can serve the development of political science. To attract scholarly attention, some illustrative examples may be helpful. Herein, more or less realistic analyses of different types of interactions between different types of agents are outlined: (1) the White House during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962; (2) three-layered interrelationship between voters, politicians and political parties; (3) the long-lasted civil war in the Sudan; and (4) trade friction in interdependent world. Note that the same “simulator” was used in all those analyses. This multi-purpose “simulator,” which has been developed in Japan, is introduced herein. Finally, some methodological possibilities are suggested.


Political Party Political Science Political Theory Electoral System Party System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allison, G.: Essence of Decision. Little, Brown, Boston (1971)Google Scholar
  2. Allison, G. and P. Zelikow: Essence of Decision, 2nd ed. Longman, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R.M.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  4. Bhavnani, Ravi: Adaptive Agents, Political Institutions and Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, JASSS 6(4) (2003)Google Scholar
  5. Bissey, Marie-Edith Mauro Carini and Guido Ortona: ALEX3: a Simulation Program to Compare Electoral Systems, JASSS 7(3) (2004)Google Scholar
  6. Bremer, Stuart A. and Michael Mihalka: Machiavelli in Machina: Or Politics among Hexagons, in Deutsch, Karl W., Bruno Fritsch, Helio Jaguaribe and Andrei S. Markovits (eds.), Problems of World Modeling. Cambridge, Ballinger (1977).Google Scholar
  7. Brouw, R.: Social Psychology. Free Press, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  8. Cederman, L.E.: Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, London (1997)Google Scholar
  9. Danno, E. and A. Tanaka: Kokusai System no Anteisei (Stability of International System), In Y. Yamamoto and A. Tanaka (eds.) Senso to Kokusai System (War and International System). Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo(1992)Google Scholar
  10. Downs, A.: An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York (1957)Google Scholar
  11. Duverger, M.: Les partis politiques: l’organisation des parties. Cours de droit, Paris (1954)Google Scholar
  12. Eidelson, Benjamin M. and Ian Lustick: VIR-POX: An Agent-Based Analysis of Smallpox Preparedness and Response Policy, JASSS 7(3) (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Epstein J.M. and Axtell R.: Growing Artificial Societies. MIT Press (1996)Google Scholar
  14. Gatherer, Derek: Identifying Cases of Social Contagion Using Memetic Isolation, JASSS 5(4) (2002)Google Scholar
  15. Grieco, J.M.: Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation, International Organization 42. (1988) 485–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grieco, J.M.: Cooperation among Nations. Cornell University Press, Ithaca(1990)Google Scholar
  17. Hishiyama, R.: Kokusai-Tsusin Rejime to Kosho (International Telecommunication Regime and International Negotiation), in Yamakage and Hattori (2002)Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, Paul E.: Simulation Modeling in Political Science, American Behavioral Scientist 42(10) (1999).Google Scholar
  19. Keohane, R.O.: After Hegemony. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, London (1984)Google Scholar
  20. Kimura, K. and H. Oda: Kokusai-Kankyo Regime no Keisei (The Formation of International Environmental Regime), in Yamakage and Hattori (2002)Google Scholar
  21. Kottonau, Johannes and Claudia Pahl-Wostl: Simulating political attitudes and voting behavior, JASSS 7(4) (2004)Google Scholar
  22. Mitsutsuji, K.: Kokumin no Togo to Bunretsu (Integration and Disintegration of a Nation), in Yamakage and Hattori (2002).Google Scholar
  23. Mitsutsuji, K.: The Artificial Political Society: Voters, Politicians and Parties in silico, Paper presented at 34th Annual Conference of International Simulation and Gaming Association, August 25–29, Kisarazu, Japan. (2003), also Working Paper No. 2 (our project)(2004)Google Scholar
  24. Myers, D. G., and H. Lamm: The Group Polarization Phenomenon, Psychological Bulletin, 83 (1976), 602–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nowak, A. et al., From Private Attitude to Public Opinion, Psychological Review, 97 (1990) 262–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olson, B. D. and J. Suls: Self-, Other, and Ideal-Judgments of Risk and Caution as a Function of the Five-Factor Model of Personality, Personality and Individual Differences, 28. (2000) 425–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raczynski, Stanislaw: Simulation of The Dynamic Interactions Between Terror and Anti-Terror Organizational Structures, JASSS 7(2) (2004)Google Scholar
  28. Sakamoto, T.: Kaso-Kokka niokeru Naisen no Saigen (Regenerating Civil War in a Virtual State), Working Paper No. 4 (our project)Google Scholar
  29. Sakamoto T.: Funso to Doin (Conflic and Mobilization), Kokusaiseiji (International Relations) 140 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. Sakamoto, T. and H. Hoshiro: Seisakukettei-Katei Simulation (The Simulation of Policy Formation Process), Working Paper No. 9 (our project) (2005)Google Scholar
  31. Sakamoto, T. and H. Hoshiro: Seisakukettei-Katei Simulation II(The Simulation of Policy Formation Process II), Working Paper No. 12 (our project) (2006)Google Scholar
  32. Sartori, G.: Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1976)Google Scholar
  33. Shimizu, T.: Shinka no simulation (Simulating Evolution), in N. Takahashi (éd.) Mirai Keisha Genri(the Principle of “Lean on Future”). Hakuto Shobou, Tokyo (1996), 29–54.Google Scholar
  34. Srbljinovic, Armano, Drazen Penzar, Petra Rodik, and Kruno Kardov: An Agent-Based Model of Ethnic Mobilisation, JASSS 6(1) (2003)Google Scholar
  35. Stoner, J. A. F.: Risky and Cautious Shifts in Group Decisions, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, (1968) 442–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suzuki, K.: Recognition of Interest and International Trade Negotiation. Paper presented at 34th Annual Conference of International Simulation and Gaming Association, August 25–29, Kisarazu, Japan. (2003), also Working Paper No. 1 (our project)(2004)Google Scholar
  37. Suzuki, K.: Hybridized Prisoner’s Dilemma Game, Working Paper (our project) (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  38. Yasuda, S: GA niyoru Shujin no Dilemma Jikken (Experiments of Prisoner’s Dilemma employing GA). Matsuyama Daigaku Ronso 13(2,3,4) (2001)Google Scholar
  39. Yamakage, S. and S. Hattori (eds.): Computer no nakano Jinko Shakai (Artificial Society inside the Computer). Kyoritsu Press, Tokyo (2002)Google Scholar
  40. Yamamoto, K.: Shakai-keiyaku no Ronri to Kiketsu (The Logic and Outcome of Social Contract), in Yamakage and Hattori(2002)Google Scholar
  41. Yamamoto, K.: Kokusai-seijigaku no Simulation (Simulation in International Relations), Toyo BunkaKiyo, 144(2003)Google Scholar
  42. Yamamoto, K.: Nation no Fukuzatsusei (The Complexity of Nations), Ph.D. dissertation (Univ. of Tokyo) (2004)Google Scholar
  43. Yamamoto, K., M. Tamada, and A. Tanaka: Senso to Domei no Kokusaishakai (International Society of War ane Alliance), in Yamakage and Hattori(2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yamakage Susumu
    • 1
  • Hoshiro Hiroyuki
    • 2
  • Mitsutsuji Katsuma
    • 3
  • Sakamoto Takuto
    • 3
  • Suzuki Kazutoshi
    • 3
  • Yamamoto Kazuya
    • 3
  1. 1.The Graduate School of Arts and Sciencesthe University of TokyoJapan
  2. 2.The Institute of Oriental Culturesthe University of TokyoJapan
  3. 3.The Graduate School of Arts and Sciencesthe University of TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations