Skip to main content

Polyethylene Properties and Their Role in Osteolysis After Total Joint Arthroplasty

  • Conference paper
Advances in Osteoarthritis

Summary

Polyethylene continues to be the weak link in total joint arthroplasty. Wear particles, regardless of their source, are capable of inducing osteolysis by the induction of cytokines, which stimulate osteoclastic bone resorption. This, ultimately, leads to failure, and if allowed to continue for a long time, potentially very difficult reconstructions. Although materials other than polyethylene generate wear debris, polyethylene wear continues to be the most important source of these particles. Oxidation after gamma irradiation leads to worsening of the wear characteristics of polyethylene. Techniques to minimize oxidative degradation are therefore of great importance. Unconsolidated polyethylene particles, also known as fusion defects, may also be responsible for increased polyethylene wear. Strict quality control for the prevention of these defects is also important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Laupacis A, et al (1994) A double-blind study of 250 cases comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty. Cost-effectiveness and its impact on health-related quality of life. Clin Orthop 298:156–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones LC, Hungerford DS (1987) Cement disease. Clin Orthop 225:192–206

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown IW, Ring PA (1985) Osteolytic changes in the upper femoral shaft following porous-coated hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 67:218–221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jasty MJ, Floyd WE III, Schiller AL, et al (1986) Localized osteolysis in stable, non-septic total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68:912–919

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Santavirta S, Hoikka V, Eskola A, et al (1990) Aggressive granulomatous lesions in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:980–984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith E, Harris WH (1995) Increasing prevalence of femoral lysis in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:407–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Howie DW, Vernon RB, Oakeshott R, Manthey B (1988) A rat model of resorption of bone at the cement-bone interface in the presence of polyethylene wear particles. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70:257–263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dannenmaier WC, Haynes DW, Nelson CL (1985) Granulomatous reaction and cystic bony destruction associated with high wear rate in a total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 198:224–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Willert H-G (1977) Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 11:157–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maguire JK Jr, Coscia MF, Lynch MH (1987) Foreign body reaction to polymeric debris following total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 216:213–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Howie DW (1990) Tissue response in relation to type of wear particles around failed hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 5:337–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Charnley J, Halley DK (1975) Rate of wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 112:170–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mirra JM, Marder RA, Amstutz HC (1982) The pathology of failed total joint arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 170:175–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Revell PA, Weightman B, Freeman MAR, Vernon-Roberts B (1978) The production and biology of polyethylene wear debris. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 91:167–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Garcia-Cimbrello E, Munuera L (1992) Early and late loosening of the acetabular cup after low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 74:1119–1129

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feller JA, Kay PR, Hodgkinson JP, et al (1994) Activity and socket wear in Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:341–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B (1990) Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:518–528

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Isaac GH, Wroblewski BM, Atkinson JR, et al (1992) A tribological study of retrieved hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 276:115–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weightman B, Light D (1986) The effect of the surface finish of alumina and stainless steel on the wear rate of UHMWPE. Biomaterials 7:20–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Buly RL, Huo MH, Salvati EA, et al (1992) Titanium wear debris in failed, cemented, total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of seventy-one cases. J Arthroplasty 7:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huk OL, Bansal M, Betts F, et al (1994) Polyethylene and metal debris generated by non-articulating surfaces of modular acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76:568–574

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wroblewski BM (1993) Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 292:191–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris WH, Sledge CB (1990) Total hip and total knee replacement. N Engl J Med 323:725–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li S, Burstein AH (1994) Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76:1080–1090

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rimnac CM, Klein RW, Betts F, et al (1994) Post irradiation aging of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76:1052–1056

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eyerer P, Ke YC (1987) Property changes of UHMW polyethylene hip endoprostheses during implantation. J Biomed Mater Res 21:275–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Streicher RM (1988) Influence of ionizing radiation in air and nitrogen for sterilization of surgical grade polyethylene implants. Radiat Phys Chem 31:693–698

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM (1986) The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68:1041–1051

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wrona M, Mayor ME, Collier JP, et al (1994) The correlation between fusion defects and damage in tibial polyethylene bearings. Clin Orthop 299:92–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gomez-Barrena E, Chang J-D, Li S, Rimnac CM, Salvati EA (1996) The role of polyethylene properties in osteolysis in total hip replacement. Instrum Course Lect 45:171–197

    Google Scholar 

  31. Goméz-Barrena E, Masri BA, Furman BD, et al (1996) Polyethylene wear in Charnley acetabular components: the interaction between clinical factors and material properties. Presented at the 63rd annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  32. Masri BA, Goméz-Barrena E, Furman BD, et al (1996) The nature of subsurface defects in retrieved Charnley acetabular components. Presented at the 63rd annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li S, Burstein AH (1997) Current concepts review: ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. The material and its use in total joint implants. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76:1080–1090

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sun DC, Stark C, Dumbelton JH (1994) Characterization and comparison of compression molded and machined UHMWPE components. Trans Orthop Res Soc 19:173

    Google Scholar 

  35. Landy M, Walker PS (1985) Wear in condylar replacement knees. A 10 year follow-up. Trans Orthop Res Soc 10:96

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sutula LC, Collier JP, Saum KA, Currier BH, Currier JH, Sanford WM, Mayor MB, Wooding RE, Sperling DK, Williams IR, et al (1995) The Otto Aufranc Award. Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the hip. Clin Orthop 319:28–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Masri BA, Goméz-Barrena E, Furman BD, et al (1996) A comparison of in vivo and in vitro oxidation of Charnley acetabular components. Presented at the 63rd annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Duus LC, Masri BA, Salvati EA, et al (1996) Optimal dosage of gamma irradiation for the sterilization of UHMWPE used in total joint replacements. Presented at the 1996 Orthopaedic Research Society annual meeting, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Masri, B.A., Salvati, E.A., Duncan, C.P. (1999). Polyethylene Properties and Their Role in Osteolysis After Total Joint Arthroplasty. In: Tanaka, S., Hamanishi, C. (eds) Advances in Osteoarthritis. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68497-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68497-8_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68499-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68497-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics