Summary
The economic evaluation of health care services for chronic disease is an imperative borned of the fact that resources are finite; that technologic capacity and the public’s demand for them have increased, and that choices are inevitable and difficult. Economic evaluation is an explicit and quantitative technique to provide qualitative assistance to those who must decide among competing uses of resources in situations of uncertainty. The forms of economic evaluation, cost of illness, cost minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit and cost-utility analyses are defined.
The economic evaluation paradigm has many methodological and conceptual problems for chronic disease. Until recently no methodological standards existed. Even with these the identification and assessment of costs, the measurement of health benefits and the valuation of health benefits — key elements — remain unstandardized. Valuation research attempts to quantitate the utilities of health states but some groups (the elderly, the uneducated, minorities) cannot deal with the questions posted and implies that their perceptions are selectively excluded from studies that will inform health policy. Chronic rheumatic disease are lifelong. All areas of function can be affected and the types of interventions, medical surgical, rehabilitation, psychosocial, vocational, are varied in their application over time and in intensity. Economic studies are short term and focused on single interventions- all inappropriate for chronic disease. In the final analysis, like it or not, the question of what health care is worth societal investment is debated in every organized system of health care delivery. This should not be done nor interpreted by only a part of the stakeholders, nor without empirical data and the input of providers, patients and potential patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Meier DE, Morrison RS, Cassel CK (1997) Improving Palliative Care. Ann Int Med; 127:225–230.
Weinstein MC (1990) Principles of cost-effective resource allocation in health care organizations. Int J Techn Assessm Health Care 6:93–103.
Johannesson M, Jonsson B (1991) Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost-benefit analysis? Health Policy 17:1–23.
Drummond MF, Richardson WS, O’Brien BJ, Levine M, Heyland D (1997) Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature XIII. How to Use an Article on Economic Analysis of Clinical Practice. Are the Results Valid. JAMA 277:1552–1557.
Russell LB et al (1996) The Role of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Health Medicine. JAMA 276;1172–1177.
Kassirer JP, Angell M (1994) The Journal’s Policy on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. NEJM 331:669–670.
Weinstein MC et al (1996) Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 276:1253–1258.
Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. A review. J Health Economics 1986;5:1–30.
Wynig MK (1997) Economic Analyses, the Medical Commons and Patients’ Dilemmas: What is the Physician’s Role? J Investigative Medicine 45: 35–43.
Katz JN, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Stability and responsiveness of utility measures. Med Care 1994;32:183–188.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Tokyo
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liang, M.H. (1998). Economic Evaluation of Health Care for Chronic Diseases. In: Eguchi, K., Klastersky, J., Feld, R. (eds) Current Perspectives and Future Directions in Palliative Medicine. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68494-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68494-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68496-1
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68494-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive