Advertisement

Strategies for Ecological Modeling

  • Louis Legendre
  • Masumi Yamamuro

Abstract

There are two broad approaches to numerical ecological models, i.e. specific and generic. In the specific approach, biological quantities in the model must be observed locally, which is often difficult or/and time-consuming. In contrast, the generic approach does not require local values of biological quantities in the model, these being computed with generic equations. In general, generic equations estimate the biological quantities in models from local values of easily observed environmental variables (e.g. temperature). Generic models have both advantages and drawbacks. On the one hand, there is no need to estimate locally biological quantities in the system, and the same model can be applied to homologous systems. On the other hand, generic models may fit less precisely local situations than specific models. In practice, the two approaches are often combined, e.g. in order to obtain rapidly at least preliminary answers to site-specific questions, generic models may be simplified to fit and explore the local situations. When detailed answers are required, specific models may be constructed using parts of existing generic models, which is an efficient use of knowledge developed by the international community, for resolving local problems.

Keywords

Particulate Organic Carbon Ecological Model Zebra Mussel Coastal Lagoon Bacterial Respiration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cousins, S. H. 1980. A trophic continuum derived from plant structure, animal size and a detritus cascade. J. Theor. Biol. 82: 607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cousins, S. H. 1985. The trophic continuum in marine ecosystems: structure and equations for a predictive model, In R. E. Ulanowicz and T. Platt [eds.], Ecosystem theory for biological oceanography. Can. Bull. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 213: 76–93.Google Scholar
  3. Hansom, J. D., AND J. E. Gordon. 1998. Antarctic environments and resources: A geographical perspective. Longham.Google Scholar
  4. Legendre, L. 1999. Environmental fate of biogenic carbon in lakes. Jpn. J. Limnol. 60: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Legendre, L. AND F. Rassoulzadegan. 1996. Food-web mediated export of biogenic carbon in oceans: environmental control. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 145: 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moloney, C. L., AND J. G. Field. 1991. The size-based dynamics of plankton food webd. I. A simulation model of carbon and nitrogen flows. J. Plankton Res. 13: 1003–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moloney, C. L. AND M. I. Lucas. 1991. The size-based dynamics of plankton food webd. II. Simulations of three contrasting southern Benguela food webs. J. Plankton Res. 13: 1039–1092.Google Scholar
  8. Rivkin, R., AND L. Legendre. 2001. Biogenic carbon cycling in the upper ocean: effects of microbial respiration. Science 291: 2398–2400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Witte, F., T. Goldschmidt, P. C. Goudswaard, W. Ligtvoet, M. J. P. Van Oijen, AND J. H. Wanink. 1992. Species extinction and concomitant ecological changes in Lake Victoria. Neth. J. Zool. 42: 214–232.Google Scholar
  10. Gerritsen, J., A. F. Holland, AND D. E. Irvine. 1994. Suspension-feeding bivalves and the fate of primary production: An estuarine model applied to Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 17: 403–416.Google Scholar
  11. Holland, R. E. 1993. Changes in planktonic diatoms and water transparency in Hatchery Bay, Bass Island Area, Western Lake Erie since the establishment of the zebra mussel. J. Great Lakes Res. 19: 617–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Indue, T., And M. Yamamuro. 2000. Respiration and ingestion rates of the filter-feeding bivalve Musculista senhousia: implications for water-quality control. J. Marine Syst. 26: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klepper, O., M. W. M. Van Der Tol, H. Scholten, And P. M. J. Herman. 1994. SMOES: a simulation model for the Oosterschelde ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 282/283: 437–451.Google Scholar
  14. Nakamura, Y., And F. Kerciku. 2000. Effects of filter-feeding bivalves on the distribution of water quality and nutrient cycling in a eutrhophic coastal lagoon. J. Marine Syst. 26: 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakata, K., F. Horiguchi, And M. Yamamuro. 2000. Model study of Lakes Shinji and Nakaumi, a coupled coastal lagoon system. J. Marine Syst. 26: 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nixon, S. W. 1988. Physical energy inputs and the comparative ecology of lake and marine ecosystems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 1005–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Remane, A. 1971. Ecology of brackish water. p. 2–210. In A. Remane and C. Schlieper [eds.], Biology of brackish water. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  18. Ricciardi, A., F. G. Whoriskey, And J. B. Rasmussen. 1995. Predicting the intensity and impact of Dreissena infestation on native unionid bivalves from Dreissena field density. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 1449–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swinbanks, D. 1988. Plans for giant freshwaterpond opposed by Japansese. Nature 332: 480.Google Scholar
  20. Wolff, W. J. 1983. Estuarine benthos. p. 151–182. In B. H. Ketchum [ed.], Estuaries and Enclosed Seas. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Yamamuro, M., And I. Koike. 1993. Nitrogen metabolism of the filter-feeding bivalve Corbicula japonica and its significance in primary production at a brackish lake in Japan. Limnol. Oceanogr. 38: 997–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yamamuro, M., J. Hiratsuka, And Y. Ishitobi. 2000. Seasonal change in a filter-feeding bivalve Musculista senhousia population of a eutrophic estuarine lagoon. J. Marine Syst. 26: 117–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis Legendre
    • 1
  • Masumi Yamamuro
    • 2
  1. 1.Villefranche Oceanography LaboratoryVillefranche-sur-Mer CedexFrance
  2. 2.Institute of Marine Resources and EnvironmentGeological Survey of JapanTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations