Skip to main content

Femoral Bone Remodeling in Hip Revision Surgery

  • Conference paper
Arthroplasty 2000
  • 133 Accesses

Summary

The femoral revision stem bridges an extensive bone defect with an implant anchored in the diaphysis to restore the function of the limb. The transfemoral approach opens the medullary canal by creating a posterolateral bony lid that remains attached to the surrounding soft tissues. Then, the loosened component, the bone cement, and the granulation tissue are removed. After reaming of the intact femoral canal distal to the site of osteolysis, the noncemented revision prosthesis is inserted. Between 1969 and 1992, 69 revision procedures were performed using the transfemoral approach. The average follow-up period was 6.5 years (range, 5-9 years). All patients had an extensive loosening (Paprosky stage 2c and 3). In 4 patients, an infected component was exchanged. The transfemoral approach allows a radical debridement of infected implants. The Merle d’Aubigné score improved from a preoperative value of 6.9 points to 13.7 points at time of follow-up. At the time of the last follow-up, all patients were pain free. Without using bone grafts, bone remodeling of the osteolytic zones was observed in all patients. Careful attention to details is the key to the prevention of serious complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, et al (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982: a two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 67A: 1074–1085

    Google Scholar 

  2. Engelbrecht DJ, Weber FA, Sweet MB, et al (1990) Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 72B: 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Devane P, et al (1994) Cementless fixation of the femur: pros and cons. AAOS Inst Course Lect 43: 329–338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner H (1989) Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk. Orthopäde 18: 438–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner H, Wagner M (1997) Prothesenwechsel mit der Femur-Revisionsprothese. Med Orthop Tech 117: 138–148

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner H, Wagner M (1998) L abord transfémoral dans les reprises de prothe;se totale de hanche. Maitrise Orthop 71: 6–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner M, Wagner H (1999) Transfemoral approach for hip revision arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol 7: 260–276

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schenk RK, Wehrli U (1989) Zur Reaktion des Knochens auf eine zementfreie SL-Femur-Revisionsprothese. Histologische Befunde an einem fünfeinhalb Monate postoperationem gewonnenen Autopsiepräparat. Orthopäde 18: 454–462

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner M (1996) Die konische Verankerung von Hüftendoprothesenschäften. Thesis, University Erlangen, Nuremberg

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paprosky WG (1990) Femoral defect classification: clinical application. Orthop Rev 14(suppl): 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Charnley J (1979) Numerical grading of clinical results. In: Charnley J (ed) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Theory and practice. Springer, New York, pp 23–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Müller ME, Jaberg H (1982) Total hip reconstruction. In: McCollister EC (ed) Surgery of the musculoskeletal system, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 2979–3017

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brooker A, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, et al (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 55A: 1629–1632

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hartwig CH, Böhm P, Czech U, et al (1996) The Wagner revision stem in alloarthro-plasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115: 5–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolstad K, Adalbeth G, Mallmin H, et al (1996) The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. Acta Orthop Scand 67: 541–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wagner, M. (2001). Femoral Bone Remodeling in Hip Revision Surgery. In: Matsui, N., Taneda, Y., Yoshida, Y. (eds) Arthroplasty 2000. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68427-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68427-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68429-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68427-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics