Skip to main content

Robodoc at Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik (BGU) Frankfurt: Experiences with the Pinless System

  • Conference paper
  • 140 Accesses

Summary

The Robodoc Pinless System was introduced at BGU Frankfurt in mid- 1998. In the preoperative planning phase, using the 3-D CT data, the surgeon places a model of the implant into position and the Orthodoc determines the cut path for Robodoc. The surgeon then creates a 3-D surface model that is used intraoperatively for pinless registration. In the operating room, the points are compared to the surface model created on the Orthodoc to register the robot to the femur position. Using the pinless system, 95%–98% of all patients can be operated on. Exclusion criteria are severely disfigured posttraumatic cases, revision cases, and cases with a nontitanium implant in the opposite leg, because there are too many metal artifacts in the CT scan. The number of pinless procedures has risen steadily since its introduction. The major advantages of the pinless procedure are that only one operation is needed. Postoperative knee pain is eliminated in most cases, and costs per surgery are reduced. Surgical time and radiation exposure are the same as in the pin-based system, and system accuracy and reliability are equal to the pin-based system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kazanzides P, Mittelstadt B, Musits B, et al (1995) An integrated system for cementless hip replacement: robotics and medical imaging technology enhance precision surgery. IEEE Eng Med Biol, pp 307–313

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mittelstadt B, Paul H, Kazanzides P, et al (1993) Development of a surgical Robot for cementless total hip replacement. Robotica 11: 553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mittelstadt BD, Kazanzides P, Zuhars J, et al (1994) The evolution of a surgical robot from prototype to human clinical use. In: Proceedings, first international symposium on medical robotics and computer assisted surgery, Pittsburgh, 1: 36–41

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bargar WL, Bauer A, DiGioia A, et al (1999) Robodoc clinical trial status. Center for Orthopaedic Research, http://www.cor.ssh.edu/projects/robodoc/status.html

  5. Lahmer A, Boerner M, Bauer A (1997) Experiences with an image directed work-station(Orthodoc) for cementless hip replacement. In: Proceedings, 11th international symposium and exhibition on computer assisted radiology and surgery (CAR’ 97), pp 939–943

    Google Scholar 

  6. Börner M, Bauer A, Lahmer A (1997) Computerunterstützter Robotereinsatz in der Hüftendoprothetik. Unfallchirurg 100: 640–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Börner M, Bauer A, Lahmer A (1997) Rechnerunterstützter Robotereinsatz in der Hüftendoprothetik. Orthopäde 26: 251–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bargar W, Bauer A, Boerner M (1998) Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc system. Clin Orthop 354: 82–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boerner M, Wiesel U (1999) Einsatz computerunterstützter Verfahren in der Unfallchirurgie. Trauma Berufskrank 1: 85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bauer A, Boerner M, Lahmer A (1997) Tierstudie: Roboterassistierte vs. Handgeraspelte Endoprothese. Langenbecks Arch Chir I (Forumband 1997): 465–469

    Google Scholar 

  11. Integrated Surgical Systems (1998) DigiMatch user manual international edition: Robodoc surgical assistant system and Orthodoc preoperative planning workstation. ISS, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lahmer A, Wiesel U, Boerner M (1999) Experiences in using the Robodoc system without pins. In: Proceedings, 4th international symposium on computer assisted orthopaedic surgery, Davos

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wiesel U, Lahmer A, Boerner M, Skibbe H (1999) Robodoc® at Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt (BGU): experiences with the pinless system. CAS 6(4): 342

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wiesel, U., Boerner, M., Lahmer, A. (2001). Robodoc at Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik (BGU) Frankfurt: Experiences with the Pinless System. In: Matsui, N., Taneda, Y., Yoshida, Y. (eds) Arthroplasty 2000. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68427-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68427-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68429-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68427-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics