Voices Unheard: The Academic and Social Experiences of University Students who are Hard of Hearing

  • Ruth P. Warick


Persons with disabilities are under-represented in universities and little is known of the nature of their university experience. As a subgroup, students who are hard of hearing are even more neglected because of the invisible nature of their hearing loss and the relatively recent recognition of their disability status. Consequently, little is known about their experiences within the university culture, with their academic programs, and with the social aspects of university life. There are knowledge gaps as to what motivates students who are hard of hearing to attend and continue in university. There is a lack of information about what constitutes a positive university experience for them and, conversely, a negative one. Nor is it known the extent, if any, their partial hearing plays in shaping their experiences and the extent to which their experiences are similar to or different from the rest of the student population. Although there have been some findings about students in general and about deaf students, the application of these findings to students who are hard of hearing is unknown.


Hearing Loss Retention Model Identity Construction Deaf Community Deaf Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andres, L., Andruske, C. & Hawkey, C. L. (1996). Mapping the realities of the five year post-secondary life: A study of students at three post-secondary institutions. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia, Centre for Policy Studies in Education.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1972 )Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greene, J. C. (1990). Three views on the nature and role of knowledge in social science. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 227 - 245 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). The making of a constructivist: A remembrance of transformations past. In E. Guba (Ed.), The Paradigm Dialog ( 67 - 87 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research ( 3rd ed. ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCutcheon, G. (1990). Ruminations on methodology of truth and significance. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), Paradigm Dialog (pp. 277–285 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college. Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth P. Warick
    • 1
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations