Skip to main content

Hearing — Objective, Subjective and Personal

  • Chapter
Hearing Impairment
  • 84 Accesses

Abstract

The measurement of hearing over the last century was dominated by testing the ability of a subject to detect tonal stimuli in the quiet when using one or other ear. Both National and International Standards proliferated to ensure the comparability of measurements wherever, whenever or however these measurements had been made. Over the last three quarters of that century developments in electrical and electroacoustic technology were able to provide a suitable, user-friendly instrument, the manual pure-tone audiometer, to measure an ear’s sensitivity. Each and every report on the hearing of an individual or a group was almost sure to include a hearing chart (audiogram) measured with such an instrument. As the century wore on technology was able to show not only how the testing could be automated, first by self-recorded audiometry and then by computerized audiometry, but how more information could be extracted, particularly using the interactive and adaptive facilities of computerization [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campbell RA (1974) Computer Audiometry. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 17: 134–140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scharf B (1988) The Role of Listening in the Measurement of Hearing. In: Measurement in Hearing and Balance. SDG Stephens and S Prasansuk (Eds). Karger. Basel. Pp 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suzuki J-i, Kodera K, lino Y, Murakami Y (1999) Reconstructive Surgery of the Middle Ear. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Luxon LM, Furman JM, Martini A, Stephens D (Eds) (2003) Textbook of Audiological Medicine. Martin Dunitz, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stephens SDG (2003) Audiological Rehabilitation. Ch 30 in LM Luxon, JM Furman, A Martini, D Stephens (Eds) Textbook of Audiological Medicine. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 513–531.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gatehouse S, Noble W (2004) The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale ( SSQ ). International Journal of Audiology 43: 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.who.int/directorgeneral/speeches/2002/english/20020418_disabilitytries html (accessed 22 September 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Noble W, Hetu R (1994) An ecological approach to disability and handicap. Audiology. 33: 117–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Borg E (1998) Audiology in an Ecological Perspective. Scandinavian Audiology Supplement 49; 27: 132–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilholme-Herbst K Psychosocial (1983) consequences of disorders of hearing in the elderly. Ch. 8 in Hinchcliffe R (Ed.) Hearing and Balance in the Elderly. Churchill- Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 174–200.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zautra A, Goodhart D (1979) Quality of life indicators: A review of the literature. Community Mental Health Review 4: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ziller RC (1974) Self-other orientation and quality of life. Social Indicators Research 1: 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. http://www.who.int/msa/qol/qll.htm(accessed 22 June 2003)

  14. Miyakita T, Ueda A, Zusho H, Kudoh Y (2002) Self-evaluation scores of hearing difficulties and quality of life components among retired workers with noise-related hearing loss. Journal of Sound and Vibration; 250: 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kerr PC, Stephens D (1997) The Use of an Open-ended Questionnaire to Identify Positive Aspects of Acquired Hearing Loss. Audiology 36: 19–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas Edison/Henry Ford Winter Estates. Terrell Publishing Co, Fort Meyers, Florida. ISBN 0-935031-67-7.http://www.si.edu/lemelson/edison/html/his_life.html(accessed 24-1-2003)

  17. Mayo E (1933) The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen G, Faulkner D (1986) Does ‘Elderspeak’ work? The effect of intonation and stress on comprehension and recall of spoken discourse in old age. Language & Communication 6: 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Comfort A (1977) A Good Age. Mitchell Beazley, London, at pp 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hinchcliffe, R. (2004). Hearing — Objective, Subjective and Personal. In: Suzuki, JI., Kobayashi, T., Koga, K. (eds) Hearing Impairment. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68397-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68397-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-22326-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68397-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics