Advertisement

Image Instrumentation of Chlorophyll a Fluorescence for Diagnosing Photosynthetic Injury

  • Kenji Omasa
  • Kotaro Takayama

Abstract

Environmental stress factors such as air pollutants, agricultural chemicals, water deficit, chilling, and UV light can affect the health of plants (Larcher 1995; Kramer and Boyer 1995; Yunus and Iqbal 1996; De Kok and Stulen 1998). The first symptoms to appear are decreases in photosynthesis and growth. Later symptoms include visible injury of leaves and withering. In recent years forest decline, which may be due to environmental stress factors including meteorological changes, has been widely reported (Schulze et al. 1989; Larcher 1995; Sandermann et al. 1997).

Keywords

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Fluorescence Yield Nonphotochemical Quenching PSII Reaction Center Actinic Light 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balachandran S, Osmond CB, Daley PF (1994) Diagnosis of the earliest strain-specific interactions between tobacco mosaic virus and chloroplasts of tobacco leaves in vivo by means of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiol 104: 1059–1065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilger W, Björkman O (1990) Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canadensis. Photosynth Res 25: 173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chappelle EW, Kim MS, McMurtrey JE III (1992) Ratio analysis of reflectance spectra (RARS): an algorithm for the remote estimation of the concentrations of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids in soybean leaves. Remote Sens Environ 39: 239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Croxdale JG, Omasa K (1990a) Chlorophyll a fluorescence and carbon assimilation in developing leaves of light-grown cucumber. Plant Physiol 93: 1078–1082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Croxdale JG, Omasa K (1990b) Patterns of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics in relation to growth and expansion in cucumber leaves. Plant Physiol 93: 1083–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daley PF (1995) Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis and imaging in plant stress and disease. Can J Plant Physiol 17: 167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daley PF, Raschke K, Ball JT, et al (1989) Topography of photosynthetic activity of leaves obtained from video images of chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Physiol 90: 1233–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Kok, Stulen I (1998) Responses of plant metabolism to air pollution and global change. BackhuysGoogle Scholar
  9. Genty B, Meyer S (1995) Quantitative mapping of leaf photosynthesis using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Aust J Physiol 22: 277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990: 87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Govindjee (1995) Sixty-three years since Kautsky: Chlorophyll a fluorescence. Aust J Plant Physiol 22: 131–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Häder DP (eds) (1992) Image analysis in biology. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Häder DP (eds) (2000) Image analysis: Methods and applications, 2nd edn. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Hashimoto Y, Kramer PJ, Nonami H, et al (1990) Measurement techniques in plant science. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones HG (1999) Use of thermography for quantitative studies of spatial and temporal variation of stomatal conductance over leaf surface. Plant Cell Environ 22: 1043–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kautsky H, Hirsch A (1931) Neue Versuche zur Kohlensäureassimilation. Naturwissenschaftren 19: 964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim MS, Krizek DT, Daughtry CST, et al (1996) Fluorescence imaging system: application for the assessment of vegetation stresses. SPIE 2959: 4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim MS, Mulchi CL, Daughtry CST, et al (1997) Fluorescence images of soybean leaves grown under increased 03 and CO2. SPIE 3059: 22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kooten OV, Snel JFH (1990) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynth Res 25: 147–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995) Water relations of plants and soils. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Krause GH, Weis E (1991) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42: 313–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larcher W (1995) Physiological plant ecology. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  23. Lichtenthaler HK (1988) Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence. KluwerGoogle Scholar
  24. Lichtenthaler HK (1996) Vegetation stress. J Plant Physiol 148: 599–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Munday JCM Jr, Govindjee (1969a) Light-induced changes in the fluorescence yield of chlorophyll a in vivo. III. The dip and the peak in the fluorescence transient of Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Biophysical J 9: 1–21Google Scholar
  26. Munday JCM Jr, Govindjee (1969b) Light-induced changes in the fluorescence yield of chlorophyll a in vivo. IV. The effect of pre-illumination on the fluorescence transient of Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Biophys J 9: 22–35Google Scholar
  27. Omasa K (1988) Image instrumentation of plants using a laser scanner (in Japanese). Proc Annu Meet Jpn Soc Environ Control Biol 1988: 14–15Google Scholar
  28. Omasa K (1990) Image instrumentation methods of plant analysis. In: Linskens HF, Jackson JF (eds) Modern methods of plant analysis, vol 11. Springer, New Series, pp 203–243Google Scholar
  29. Omasa K (1992) Image diagnosis of photosynthesis in cultured tissues. Acta Hortic 319: 653–658Google Scholar
  30. Omasa K (1994) Diagnosis of trees by portable thermographic system. In: Kuttler W, Jochimsen M (eds) Immissionsökologische Forschung im Wandel der Zeit. Essener Ökologische Schriften, pp 141–152Google Scholar
  31. Omasa K (1998) Image instrumentation of chlorophyll a fluorescence. SPIE 3382: 91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Omasa K (2000) Phytobiological IT in agricultural engineering. Proc XIV Memorial CIGR World Congress 2000: 125–132Google Scholar
  33. Omasa K, Aiga I (1987) Environmental measurement: image instrumentation for evaluating pollution effects on plants. In: Singh MG (ed) Systems and control encyclopedia. Pergamon Press, pp 1516–1522Google Scholar
  34. Omasa K, Shimazaki K (1990) Image analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves. In: Hashimoto Y, Kramer PJ, Nonami H, et al (eds) Measurement technique in plant science. Academic Press, pp 387–401Google Scholar
  35. Omasa K, Croxdale JG (1992) Image analysis of stomatal movements and gas exchange. In: Häder DP (ed) Image analysis in biology. CRC Press, pp 171–193Google Scholar
  36. Omasa K, Shimazaki K, Aiga I, et al (1987) Image analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence transients for diagnosing the photosynthetic system of attached leaves. Plant Physiol 84: 748–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Omasa K, Maruyama S, Matthews MA, et al (1991) Image diagnosis of photosynthesis in water-deficit plants. IFAC Workshop Series 1991, No. 1. Pergamon Press, pp 383–388Google Scholar
  38. Omasa K, Takayama K, Goto, E (2001) Image diagnosis of photosynthetic injuries induced by herbicide in plants: comparison of the induction method with the saturation pulse method for chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis (in Japanese with English summary). J Soc High Tech Agric 13: 29–37Google Scholar
  39. Osmond CB, Daley PF, Badger MR, et al (1998) Chlorophyll fluorescence quenching during photosynthetic induction in leaves of Abutilon striatum dicks. Infected with abutilon mosaic virus, observed with a field-portable imaging system. Bot Acta 111: 390–397Google Scholar
  40. Papageorgiou G (1975) Chlorophyll fluorescence: an intrinsic probe of photosynthesis. In: Govindjee (ed) Bioenergetics of photosynthesis. Academic Press, pp 319–371Google Scholar
  41. Papageorgiou G, Govindjee (1968) Light-induced changes in the fluorescence yield of chlorophyll a in vivo. I. Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Biophys J 8: 1316–1328Google Scholar
  42. Quick WP, Horton P (1984) Studies on the induction of chlorophyll fluorescence in barley protoplasts. II. Resolution of fluorescence quenching by redox state and the trans-thylakoid pH gradient. Proc R Soc Lond B 220: 371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rencz AN (ed) (1999) Manual of remote sensing, 3rd edn., vol 3. Wiley, New York, p707Google Scholar
  44. Rolfe SA, Scholes JD (1995) Quantitative imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence. New Phytol 131: 69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saito Y, Takahashi K, Nomura E, et al (1997) Visualization of laser-induced fluorescence of plants influenced by environmental stress with a microfluorescence imaging system and a fluorescence imaging lidar system. SPIE 3059: 190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Heath RL (1997) Forest decline and ozone. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  47. Schreiber U (1986) Detection of rapid induction kinetics with a new type of high-frequency modulated chlorophyll fluorometer. Photosynth Res 9: 261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schreiber U, Schliwa U, Bilger W (1986) Continuous recording of photochemical and non- photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynth Res 10: 51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schulze ED, Lange OL, Oren R (eds ) (1989) Forest decline and air pollution. Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  50. Siebke K, Weis E (1995a) Assimilation images of leaves of Glechoma hederacea: analysis of non-synchronous stomata related oscillations. Planta 196: 155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Siebke K, Weis E (1995b) Imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence in leaves: topography of photosynthetic oscillations in leaves of Glechoma hederacea. Photosynth Res 45: 225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Takayama K, Goto E, Omasa K (2000) Diagnosis of photosynthetic injury caused by agricultural chemicals using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Proc XIV Memorial CIGR World Congress 2000: 1436–1441Google Scholar
  53. Wessman CA (1990) Evaluation of canopy biochemistry. In: Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (Eds) Remote sensing of biosphere functioning. Springer, pp 135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yunus M, Iqbal M (1996) Plant response to air pollution. WileyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer -Verlag Tokyo 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenji Omasa
    • 1
  • Kotaro Takayama
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoBunkyo-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations