Prosthetic Replacement Surgery for Spine Metastasis

  • Keiro Ono
  • Sohei Ebara
  • Kazuo Yonenobu
  • Noboru Hosono
  • Edward J. Dunn
Conference paper


In the early 1970s, we began to find an increasing number of patients with metastatic disease of the spine, primarily cervical, presenting with constant pain. Subsequently neural deficits associated with vertebral collapse occurred and there was, according to professionals in the field, “nothing to do with them” or because “they don’t have long to go.” When we looked more carefully at these patients, it became obvious that they had all gathered together in one group and were generally treated in one or two ways; either only supportive care was provided or they were subjected to radio-therapy and/or laminectomy. Under more careful scrutiny, it became apparent that this was not a homogenous group. There were differences in these patients based on the primary tumor, location and number of metastatic sites, their general conditions, and, considering these factors, their long-term prognoses. We began to select those patients with a reasonable remaining life span of over 6 months who have pain due to instability and/or neural compression from vertebral collapse and carried out instrument replacement supplemented by methyl-methacrylate posteriorly and, in some instances, methyl-methacrylate replacement of vertebral bodies anteriorly. We were pleased with the pain relief and return of neural function achieved in these patients. Through similar experiences in subsequent years, we developed a metal prosthesis for replacement of the metastatic tumor-affected vertebra [1] (Fig. 1).


Vertebral Body Bone Cement Spine Metastasis Vertebral Collapse Prosthetic Replacement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ono K, Tada K (1975) Metal prosthesis of the cervical vertebra. J Neurosurg 42: 562–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ono K, Yonenobu K, Ebara S, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K, Fuji T, Dunn EJ (1988) Prosthetic replacement surgery for cervical spine metastasis. Spine 13: 817–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ohta N, Fuji T, Fukushima F, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K, Ono K (1983) An experimental study of strength for compression force of alumina ceramic vertebral spacer. Orthopaedic Ceramic Implants 2: 91–95Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boland PJ, Lane JM, Sundaresan N (1982) Metastatic disease of the spine. Clin Orthop 169: 95–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Black P (1979) Spinal metastasis: Current status and recommended guidelines for management. Neurosurgery 5: 726–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Constans JP, Divitiis E, Donzelli R, Spaziante R, Meder JF, Haye C (1983) Spinal metastases with neurological manifestations, Review of 600 cases. J Neurosurg 59: 111–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harrington KP (1981) The use of methylmetacrylate for vertebral-body replacement and anterior stabilization of pathological fracture-dislocations of the spine due to metastatic malignant disease. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 63: 36–46Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Onimus M, Schraub S, Bertin D, Bosset JF, Guidet M (1986) Surgical treatment of vertebral metastasis. Spine 11: 883–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilbert RW, Kim JH, Posner JB (1978) Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumor: Diagnosis and treatment. Ann Neurol 3: 40–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keiro Ono
  • Sohei Ebara
  • Kazuo Yonenobu
  • Noboru Hosono
    • 1
  • Edward J. Dunn
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOsaka University Medical SchoolFukushima-ku, Osaka, 553Japan
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryWorcester Memorial HospitalWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations