Advertisement

The Present Day Usage of Nonselective Shunts

  • Henri Bismuth
  • David J. Sherlock
  • René Adam

Abstract

The term “nonselective shunt” applies to a portal deviation which decompresses the entire portal system, in contrast to a “selective shunt” which decompresses only a portion of the portal vasculature. The nonselective shunts can be identified by their anatomical position: portacaval, mesentericocaval or splenorenal. These shunts can also be described by the degree to which they decompress the entire portal flow: “total” in which the portal pressure is reduced to approximately the systemic venous pressures, and “partial” in which only a restricted amount of portal flow is deviated into the systemic venous system, hence “taking the head off the pressure” and reducing the risk of variceal bleeding while maintaining hepatopetal flow [1].

Keywords

Portal Hypertension Cirrhotic Patient Variceal Bleeding Portal Flow Portacaval Shunt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bismuth H, Moreaux J, Hepp J (1966) L’anastomose splénorenale centrale dans le traitement de l’hypertension portale. Ann Chir 25: 1441–1445Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vidal LM (1903) Traitment chirugical des ascites dans les cirrhoses du foie 16th Cong Franc Chir 16: 294–296Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eck NV (1877) On the question of the portal vein, Voen Med Zh 130: 1–2Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whipple AO (1945) The problem of portal hypertension in relation to the hepatosplenopathies, Ann Surg 122: 449–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blakemore AH, Lord JW (1945) The technique of vitallium tube in establishing portacaval shunts for portal hypertensions. Ann Surg 122: 476–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hahn M, Massen O, Nencki M, Pavlow J (1893) Die Eckische Fistel zwischen der unteren Hohlvene und Pfortader und ihre Folgen für den Organismus, Arch Exp Path Pharmak 32: 161–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackson FC, Perrin EB, Smith AG (1968) A clinical investigation of the portacaval shunt, Am J Surg 115: 22–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mutchnick NG, Lerner E, Cann HO (1974) Portal-systemic encephalopathy and the portacaval anastomoses: A prospective controlled investigation. Gastroenterology 66: 1005–1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McDermott WV, Adams RD, Riddell AG (1954) Ammonia metabolism in man. Ann Surg 140: 539–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Starzl TE, Porter KA, Watanabe K, Putnam CW (1976) The effects of insulin, glucagon and insulin/ glucagon infusion upon liver morphology and cell division after complete portacaval shunt in dogs. Lancet I: 821–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kato R (1977) Drug metabolism under pathological and abnormal physiological states in animals and man, Xenobiotica 7: 25–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Starzl TE, Porter KA, Francavilla A (1983) The Eck fistula in animals and humans. Curr Probl Surg 20: 687–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hourigan K, Sherlock S, George P, Mindel S (1971) Elective end-to-side portacaval shunts; results in 64 cases. Br Med J 4: 473–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iwatsuki S, Mikkelsen WP, Redeker AG, Reynolds TB, Turrill FL (1973) Clinical comparison of the end-to-side portacaval shunt: Ten year follow up. Ann Surg 178: 65–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marion P (1954) Traitement chirurgical de l’hypertension portale. Hel Med Acta 21: 375Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clatworthy HW, Wall T, Watman RN (1955) A new type of portal-to-systemic venous shunt for portal hypertension. Arch Surg 71: 588–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lord J, Rossi G, Daliana M, Rosati L (1970) Mesocaval shunt modified by use of a teflon prosthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 130: 525–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Read R, Thompson B, Wise W, Murphy M (1970) Mesocaval “H” venous homografts. Arch Surg 101: 785–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drapanas T (1972) Interposition mesocaval shunt for treatment of portal hypertension. Ann Surg 176; 435; 46–50Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Terpstra OT, Ausema JS, Bruining HA, Lameris JS, Reuvers CB, Schalm SW, Van Urk H, Wilson JH (1987) Late results of mesocaval interpositional shunting for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 74: 787–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bismuth H, Sherlock DJ (to be published) Porta-systemic shunt versus transplantation for the Budd-Chiari syndrome. Ann SurgGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Linton RR, Ellis DS, Geary JL (1961) Critical comparative analysis of early and late results of spleno-renal and direct portacaval shunt performed in 169 patients with portal cirrhosis. Ann Surg 154: 446–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clatworthy HW, Boles ET (1959) Extrahepatic portal bed block in children: Pathogenesis and treatment. Ann Surg 150: 371–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fischer JE, Bower RH, Atamian S, Welling L (1981) Comparison of distal and proximal splenorenal shunts—a randomised prospective trial. Ann Surg 194: 531–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cullini FJ, Brener B (1990) Portal hypertension. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170: 177–192Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Millikan WJ, Warren WD, Henderson JM (1985) The Emory prospective randomised trial; selective verses non-selective shunt to control variceal bleeding ten-year follow up. Ann Surg 201: 712–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paquet K, Mercado M, Koussouris P, Kalk J, Seimens F, Cuan Orozco (1989) Improved results with selective distal splenorenal shunt in a highly selected patient population. Ann Surg 210: 184–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Flamant Y, Branche D, Maillard JN Les thromboses splenoportales. In: Mouiel J (ed) Actualités digestives médico-chirugicales. Masson, Paris, pp 170-179Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bismuth H, Csillag MJ, Benhamou JP, Fauvert R (1965) L’anastomose porto-cave chez le rat normal IV influence du calibre de l’anastomose. Rev Franc Etud Clin Biol 10: 1087–1092PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bismuth H, Franco D, Hepp J (1974) Portal-systemic shunt in hepatic cirrhosis—does the type of shunt decisively influence clinical results?. Ann Surg 179: 209–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Malt RB, Malt RA (1979) Tests and management affecting survival after portacaval and splenorenal shunts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 149: 220–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Campbell DP, Parker DE, Anagnostopoulos D (1973) Survival prediction in portacaval shunts: A computerized statistical analysis. Am J Surg 126: 748–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mikkelsen WP (1974) The therapeutic portacaval shunt. Preliminary data on controlled trial and morbid effects of acute hyaline necroses. Arch Surg 108: 302–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Johansen K, Eide B, Carrico CJ (1983) Enhanced survival in patients with variceal bleeding after elective portal decompression. Am J Surg 145: 596–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mehigan DG, Zuidema GD, Cameron JL (1980) The incidence of shunt occlusion following porto-systemic decompression. Surg Gynecol Obstet 150: 661–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bismuth H, Houssin D, Grange D (1983) Suppression of the shunt and esophageal transection. A new technique for the treatment of disabling post-shunt encephalopathy. Am J Surg 146: 392–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soterakis J, Resnick RH, Iber FL (1973) Effect of alcohol abstinence on survival in cirrhotic portal hypertension, Lancet II: 65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jackson FC, Perrin EB, Felix WR, Smith AG (1971) A clinical investigation of the portacaval shunt: Survival analysis of the therapeutic operation. Ann Surg 174: 672–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Resnick RH, Iber FL, Ishihara AM, Chalmers TC, Zimmerman H, The Boston Interhospital Liver Group (1974) A controlled study of the therapeutic portacaval shunt. Gastroenterology 67: 843–857PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rueff B, Egos F, Degos JD, Maillard JN, Prandi D, Sicot J, Sicot C, Fauvert R, Benhamou JP (1976) A controlled study of therapeutic portacaval shunt in alcoholic cirrhosis. Lancet I: 655–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reynolds TB, Donovan AJ, Mikkelsen WP, Redeker AG, Turrill Fl, Weiner JM (1981) Results of a 12-year randomized trial of portacaval shunt in patients with alcoholic liver disease and bleeding varices. Gastroenterology 80: 1005–10011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lacaine F, Bismuth H (1980) Analyse critique des essacs therapeutique comparatifs dans les derivations portales electives. Gastroent Clin Biolog 804: 811Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bismuth H, Adam R, Mathur S, Sherlock DJ (1990) Options for elective treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients in the transplantation era. Am J Surg 160: 105–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rypins EB, Sarfeh J (1988) Influence of portal hemodynamics on long term survival of alcoholic cirrhosis patients after small diameter portacaval H grafts. Ann Surg 155: 152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Conn HO (1981) A peak at the Child-Turcotte classification. Hepatology 1: 673–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni ML, Williams R (1973) Transsection of the oesophagus for bleeding varices. Br J Surg 60: 646–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Woodward JC, Webster PD (1972) Comparison of portacaval shunts in patients with alcoholic and non-alcoholic disease. Am J Diag Dis 72: 997–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cello JP, Deveney KE, Trunkey D, Heilbron DC, Stoney RJ, Ehrenfeld WK, Way LW (1981) Factors influencing survival after therapeutic shunt. Am J Surg 141: 257–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Conn HO, Lindenmuth WW, May CJ, Ramsby GR (1972) Prophylactic portacaval anastomosis: A tale of two studies. Medicine 52: 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jackson FC, Perrin EB, Smith AG, Dagradi AE, Nadal HM (1968) A clinical investigation of the portacaval shunt: Survival analysis of the prophylactic operation. Am J Surg 115: 22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Resnick RH, Chalmers TC, Ishihara A, Schimmel EM (1969) The Boston Interhospital Liver Group: a controlled study of the prophylactic portacaval shunt. A final report. Ann Intern Med 70: 675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Graham DY, Smith JL (1981) The course of patients after variceal bleeding. Gastroenterology 80: 800–809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Orloff MJ, Duguary LR, Kosta LD (1977) Criteria for selection of patients for emergency portacaval shunt. Am J Surg 134: 146–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sarfeh J (1979) Portal vein thrombosis associated with cirrhosis. Arch Surg 114: 900–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Conn HH (1977) Trailmaking and number connection tests in the assessment of mental state in portal systemic encephalopathy. Am J Dig Dis 22: 541–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Degos J, Meyrignac C, Kammerer J, Houi G, Jany, G (1980) Action du Diazepam sur l’EEG des cirrhotiques. Nouv Press Med 9: 1097–1100Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bismuth H, Sherlock DJ (1990) Revolution in liver surgery. J Gastroent Supp 1: 95–109Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Smith RB, Warren WD, Salam AA (1980) Dacron interposition shunt for portal hypertension: An analysis of morbidity correlates. Ann Surg 192: 9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sugiura M, Futagawa S (1973) A new technique for treating esophageal varices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 66: 677–685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fekete F, Belghiti J, Grenier P, Lebrec D (1982) L’encephalopathie après anastomose splénorenale distale est-elle en rapport avec les modifications hémodynamiques splanchniques?. Chirurgie 108: 519–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Maillard JN, Flamant YM, Hay JM, Chandler JG (1979) Selectivity of the distal splenorenal shunt. Surgery 86: 663–671PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henri Bismuth
  • David J. Sherlock
  • René Adam
    • 1
  1. 1.Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Research Unit, South Paris Faculty of MedicinePaul Brousse HospitalVillejuifFrance

Personalised recommendations