CT and MRI in the Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension

  • Yuji Itai


Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are useful in the diagnosis of portal hypertension, not only in the demonstration of collaterals but also in the evaluation of the underlying disease and its treatment (e. g., patency of portocaval shunt). Both procedures can examine any parts of the body with minimum interference from body conditions (gas, bone, and/or fat) as long as the patient is cooperative during the examination.


Portal Hypertension Gastric Varix Dynamic Compute Tomography Coronary Vein Splenorenal Shunt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ishikawa T, Tsukuno Y, Ohyama Y, Fujikawa M, Sakuyama K, Fujii M (1980) Venous abnormalities in portal hypertension demonstrated by CT. AJR 134: 271–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nakayama T, Hiyama Y, Ohnishi K, Tsuchiya S, Kohno K, Nakajima Y, Okuda K (1983) Arterioportal shunt on dynamic computed tomography. AJR 140: 953–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Yamuchi M, Minami M, Yashiro N, Furui S (1986) Dynamic CT features of arterio-portal shunt in hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR 146: 723–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Partanen KP (1984) Dynamic CT of liver cirrhosis. Invest Radiol 19: 303–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradley WG, Waluch V (1985) Blood flow: Magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 154: 443–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waluch V, Bradley WG (1984) NMR even echo rephasing in slow laminar flow. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8: 594–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bradley WG, Waluch V, Lai KS, Fernandez EJ, Spalter C (1984) The appearance of rapidly flowing blood on magnetic resonance images. AJR 143: 1167–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams DM, Cho KJ, Aisens AM, Echkhauser FE (1985) Portal hypertension evaluated by MR imaging. Radiology 157: 703–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ohtomo K, Itai Y, Makita K, Yashiro N, Yoshikawa K, Kokubo T, Iio M (1986) Portosystemic collaterals on MRI imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10: 751–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernardino ME, Steinberg HV, Pearson TC, Gedgauda-McClees RK, Torres WE, Henderson MJ (1986) Shunts for portal hypertension: MR and angiography for determination of patency. Radiology 158: 57–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torres WE, Gaylord GM, Whitmire L, Chuang VP, Bernardino ME (1987) Correlation between MR and angiography in portal hypertension. AJR 148: 1109–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Balthazar EJ (1981) CT evaluation of esophageal varices. AJR 148: 131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lafortune M, Constantin A, Breton G, Legare AG, Lavoie P (1985) Recanalized umbilical vein in portal hypertension: A myth. AJR 144: 549–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCain AH, Bernardino ME, Sones PJ, Berkman WA, Gasarella WJ (1985) Varices from portal hypertension: Correlation of CT and angiography. Radiology 154: 63–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Okada Y, Kokudo N, Itoh T, Katamoto T, Terano A (1989) Collaterals of portal hypertension running through the liver: Paraumbilical vein (abstract in English). Rinsho Hoshasen 34: 865–870PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamauchi T, Itai Y, Furui S, Ohtomo K, Terano A (1987) Prominent collateral vein in portal hypertension mimicking liver tumors: A pitfall in computed tomography. Br J Radiol 60: 531–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mori H, Hayashi K, Fukuda T, Matsunaga N, Futagawa S, Nagasaki M, Matsubara M (1987) Intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt: Occurrence in patients with and without liver cirrhosis, AJR 149: 711–714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Torres WE, Whitmire LF, McClees KG, Bernardino MR (1986) Computed tomography of hepatic morphologic changes in cirrhosis of the liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10: 47–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Itai Y, Ohnishi S, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Yoshida H, Yoshikawa K, Imawari M (1987) Regenerating nodules of liver cirrhosis: MR imaging. Radiology 165: 419–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ohtomo K, Itai Y, Ohtomo Y, Shiga J, Iio M (1990) Regenerating nodules of liver cirrhosis MR imaging—pathologic correlation. AJR 154: 505–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Minami M, Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Ohnishi S, Niki T, Kokubo T, Yoshikawa K, Iio M (1989) Siderotic nodules in the spleen: MR imaging of portal hypertension. Radiology 172: 681–684PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sagoh T, Itoh K, Togashi K, Shibata T, Nishimura K, Minami S, Asato R, Noma S, Fujisawa I, Yamashita K, Nakano Y, Konishi J (1989) Gamna-Gandy bodies of the spleen: Evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 172: 685–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Araki T, Hayakawa K, Okada J, Hayashi S, Uchiyama G, Yamada K (1985) Hepatic schistosomiasis japonica identified by CT. Radiology 157: 757–760PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dachman AH, Ros PR, Goodman ZD, Olmsted WW, Ishak KG (1987) Nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver: Clinical and radiologic observations. AJR 148: 717–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mathieu D, Vasile N, Menu Y, Beers BV, Lophelin JM, Pringot J (1987) Budd-Chiari syndrome: Dynamic CT. Radiology 165: 409–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stark DD, Hahn PF, Trey C, Clouse ME, Ferrucci JT Jr (1986) MRI of the Budd-Chiari syndrome. AJR 146: 1141–1148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuji Itai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of TsukubaTsukuba, 305Japan

Personalised recommendations