Gastric Cancer pp 319-330 | Cite as

Treatment Results of Gastric Cancer Patients: Japanese Experience

  • Taira Kinoshita
  • Keiichi Maruyama
  • Mitsuru Sasako
  • Kazuo Okajima


The Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (JRSGC) was established in 1962, and promoted actively, basic study as well as clinical management of the disease. Leading institutions of Japan, 311 in all, participated in the society; 214 were involved with surgical oncology, 54 medical oncology, 11 radiology, and 32 basic research. In order to standardize the documentation of diagnosis, treatment, and pathological findings, the society published a manual in 1962; “The General Rules for Gastric Cancer Study in Surgery and Pathology” [1]. The manual had peen periodically improved and the 12th edition is now in use. The JRSGC and the National Cancer Center started a nationwide data collection of gastric cancer patients in 1963 using the mannual. Approximately 10 000 new patients had been registered annually from the member institutions. This registration was considered to cover approximately 16% of the gastric cancer patients in Japan. The collected data were analyzed by computer, and the results were published as annual reports (Fig. 1). The results showed the characteristics of gastric cancer as well as the latest situation of diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer patients in Japan. Using the nationwide database, we revealed the results of gastric cancer treatments in Japan.


Gastric Cancer Gastric Cancer Patient Early Gastric Cancer Total Gastrectomy Distal Gastrectomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    JRSGC (1985) The general rule for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Jpn J Surg 11: 127–139Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    JRSGC (1966–1993) Annual reports of gastric cancer patients treated in 1963–1989, Reports 1–31, National Cancer Center Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rohde H, Gebbensleben B, Bauer P, Stutzer H, Zieschang J (1989) Has there been any improvement in the staging of gastric cancer? Findings from the German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group. Cancer 64: 2465–2481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curtis RE, Kennedy BJ, Myers MH, Hankey BF (1983) Evaluation of AJC stomach cancer staging using the SEER population. Semin Onco 12: 21–31Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rohde H, Stutzer H, Bauer P, Heitmann K, Gebbensleben B, and the German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group (1991) Early gastric cancer in comparison to advanced gastric cancer. Langenbeacks Arch Chir 376: 16–22Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    UICC: TNM Classification of malignant tumours, ed. 4, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 43–46, 1987Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer WC, Damiano RJ, Postlethwait RW, Rotolo FS (1987) Adenocarcinima of the stomach, changing patterns over the last 4 decades. Ann Surg 205: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maruyama K, Okabayashi K, Kinoshita T (1987) Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality. World J Surg 11: 418–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rohde H, Bauer P, StUtzer H, Heitmann K, Gebbensleben B, and the German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group (1991) Proximal compared with distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: Difference and consequences. Br J Surg 78: 1242–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dent DM, Madden MV, Price SK (1988) Randmized comparison of R1 and R2 gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 75: 110–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shiu MH, Moore E, Saunders M, Huvos A, Freedman B, Goodbold J, Chaiyaphruk S, Wesdorp R, Brennan M (1987) Influence of the extent of resection on survival after curative treatment of gastric carcinoma. Arch Surg 122: 1347–1351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siewert JR, Lange J, Böttcher K, Stier A (1986) Lymphadenektomie beim Magenkarzinom. Langenbecks Arch Chirur 368: 137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gall FP, Hermanek P (1985) New aspects in the surgical treatment of gastreic carcinoma—a comparative study of 1636 patients operated on between 1969 to 1982. Eur J Surg Oncol 11: 219–225PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taira Kinoshita
  • Keiichi Maruyama
  • Mitsuru Sasako
  • Kazuo Okajima
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical OncologyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastKashiwa, Chiba 7, 27Japan

Personalised recommendations